About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Coulter on Hannity: Liberals "want to outlaw an opposing point of view. We just wondered why they were rooting for the terrorists"

March 05, 2009 9:44 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wookie (March 05, 2009 9:51 pm ET)
         
      Actually we would be happy if you had a point of view aside from shameless self promotion and a persecution complex.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Übermensch (March 05, 2009 9:54 pm ET)
         
      What's all this babble about outlawing an opposing viewpoint? If she is referring to the debunked idea that the Fairness Doctrine will be reinstated than she need hit upside the head with a big stick of reality.

      you stay classy Ann Coulter
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (March 05, 2009 10:02 pm ET)
         
      Who was it that argued for the "unitary executive", gave us warrantless wiretaps, extraordinary rendition, the leaking of a covert CIA agent's identity, the threatening of journalists from the White House press secretary's podium, a vice president who was neither executive or legislative but was allowed to be completely secret, the expulsion from Bush rallies and arrest of peaceful citizens simply for wearing t shirts or displaying bumper stickers mildly critical of the George W. Bush and his administration, Congressional resolutions condemning advocacy groups who were critical of Bush-loyal military leaders, used the Justice Department to bring bad faith prosecutions against Democrats whole ignoring evidence of crimes by Republicans, rigged elections and redistricting to put Republicans into office, and on and on and ON!?

      There WAS an administration that wanted to outlaw opposing points of view and took covert and overt steps to make it happen. It was Bush's. And Coulter supported it. That's why her name is just another word for hypocrite.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (March 05, 2009 10:22 pm ET)
           
        And of course Bush was paying reporters to push his agenda. But now conservatives are all about investigative journalism. Inspiring isn't it?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by megabot (March 05, 2009 11:10 pm ET)
         

      "Liberals want to outlaw the other point of view."

      Coming from the person who called all liberals "traitors" during the Bush years and wanted to send them to Guantanamo AND released a book named "Treason".

      Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (March 06, 2009 11:07 am ET)
           

        She will never acknowledge that she's a hypocrite, and neither will her fans.

        But yes, she truly is. She says it's "treason" when others had views opposing the administration, and she has decried the "victim" mentality while ALWAYS describing herself and her friends as victims of the liberals.

        It really is amazing what money can do to a brain.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Druidblue (March 06, 2009 12:17 am ET)
         

      Coulter is, by every measure, worse of a human being than Adolf Hitler ever dreamed of being.

       I cringe to think of the nightmare that would exist if she had her "vision" of America come true... 

       There's free speech, but is it worth it just to deliberately try to keep us a divided nation?  In cases like hers, where there is no truth, logic, or wisdom to her statements, and her mind is closed tighter than a submarine hull, there's no point in allowing her to speak.   It can only do others a disservice, and even cause harm if one was foolish enough to listen to ANYTHING she had to say and apply an ounce of belief to it.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by BoboSoetoro (March 06, 2009 1:06 am ET)
        1

      Ann Coulter did hit the ball out of the park in her latest article, "Olbermann's Plastic Ivy". 

      "Keef" likes to fancy himself an Ivy League type, and often boasts of his bachelors degree from Cornell.  But, as Coulter points out, Olbermann didn't attend Cornell University's School of Arts and Sciences (the Ivy League Cornell).  Keefy went to an affiliated state land-grant collegel, the Cornell College of Agriculture and Life Sciences...the school that offers classes in milking and bovine management....and "communications".

      Ann ends her piece advising Olbermann that she has set him free by outing him, and he should thank her...

      "Now you won't have to quickly change the subject whenever people idly remark that they didn't know it was possible to major in "communications" at an Ivy League school."


       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Übermensch (March 06, 2009 2:21 am ET)
           
        Although true, Keith Olbermann did not attend Cornell’s Main Campus, he did attended Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences which is the sister school that falls under the umbrella of Cornell University. Thusly, Cornell recognizes his degree as being from them. He can still claim he graduated from Cornell University. It’s not a difficult concept to grasp.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (March 06, 2009 5:00 am ET)
           

        As Olbermann pointed out, he went to the NY state-side Cornell, where the tuition is about 1/10th that of the wholly private Cornell. So who's the fool?

        Besides, Cornell has a unique history in this area that takes nothing away from its diploma. Since Coulter knew about this, why did she go to Cornell in the first place?

        If Cornell is fishy this way, and offers watered-down degrees, why didn't she go to Yale, or Barnard, or Penn, instead? 

        As always, her phony points only end up cheapening herself. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by carlileb5935 (March 06, 2009 5:16 am ET)
             

          P.S. 

          Just read Coulter's thing on Olbermann and Cornell.

          Question:  does she always write in one-sentence paragraphs? Is that Ivy League training in action?

          She might also want to check the SAT/Acceptance rate of the "Agriculture and Fine Arts" School. It's about the same as the rest of the school.

          And again, why would an 'Ivy Leaguer" want to go to such a sullied, wierd set-up of a college, if it was so flaky? What she's saying is that her Cornell degree is cheapened.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by harley (March 06, 2009 7:09 am ET)
           
        Bozo is one of those hicks that buys her favorite college team's t-shirt at Wal-Mart and trash talks the rival team louder and longer.  But, the sad and obvious fact is that bozo has never set foot on a college campus let alone a community college.  You are pretty desperate to start bath mouthing someone's college especially since your heroes, drugbaugh and vannity, do not even possess a college education. Dolt.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (March 06, 2009 11:11 am ET)
           

        Olbermann is a pompous self-important jerk who seems to just take whatever MMFA writes and put it on the air.

        What does that have to do with Coulter being a hypocritical hate-monger?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (March 06, 2009 11:53 am ET)
           
        So what?  Who cares where Keith Olberman went to school?  Is the right really arguing now that only Ivy league colleges mean anything?  Sounds a little bit elitist..and truly pathetic.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (March 06, 2009 9:35 am ET)
         
      So, Ms. Coulter, please tell me who among democrats were "rooting" for the terrorists? Please provide a quote of anyone who was doing that, or is doing that. Something tells me, that you can't do it.

      And Bobo, if you had been around here long enough, you'd know that there are a lot of liberals on this board who don't exactly agree with Keith Olberman ever, or hardly ever. It's really not that hard to understand. Thing is, he DID get his degree from Cornell. And posting about him under this topic has nothing to do with what Coulter was saying on this subject now does it? Nope... I love how you're a republican extreme right wing talking point. You have it down fairly well, and seem to not have an original thought in your mind. That's OK, we just know what you are though.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 06, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
         
      "LIBERALS Want to outlaw opposing points of view."Isn't that what you have been advocating and doing your entire McCARTHYESQ like carrier, eh,ANNTHRAX?
      Report Abuse