O'Reilly and Miller belittle leaked ICRC report which reportedly concluded torture was conducted at CIA "black site" prisons
March 17, 2009 10:53 am ET
New York Review of Books: US Torture: Voices from the Black Sites
Washington Post: Red Cross Described 'Torture' at CIA Jails
Media Matters: The right-wing media's election analysis just ain't that good
The Friday Rush: For conservatives, $400 million buys defeat at the ballot box
The myth of Fox News' ratings spike
Miller looks like he's been on a 2 month drinking binge since President Obama's inauguration. Remember, this little weasel turn-coat ran to the radical right party following 9/11 because he's a typical frightened fringe lunatic. Now that his new party is a complete and utter failure, he must be in a desperate mindset as what to do next.
My only comment is that, should Miller and O'Reilly be subject to the conditions of rendition then perhaps it wouldn't be so low on the netflix queue anymore. Especially knowing that one is innocent. However, his point should be taken that the number of individuals effected is relatively insignificant when placed against the number of people effected if this country is not reformed.
That’s because you, like O'Reilly, are a DIHONEST, UNINFORMED IDIOT, Mr. Miller:
Cash bounties offered by U.S. forces encouraged local villagers to turn in as many people as they could capture. And this is what Abu Bakker and two dozen other Uighurs say happened to them.
John Kiriakou, a top CIA official in Pakistan after 9/11, describes the Americans’ dilemma. “If a Pakistani or Afghan villager comes up to you with a guy he has tied up and says, ‘This is a terrorist; I caught him in my village,’ what are you going to do?” he says. “Maybe he is a terrorist.”
Kiriakou says the only way to sort out the captives was to send them to Guantanamo.
argh. *DISHONEST*
(note to self, finish writing, then spellcheck)