About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Davis to Hannity on AIG: "I am amazed that you don't mention Secretary Paulson and the previous administration that was responsible for the back of the envelope proposal"

March 17, 2009 10:19 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Media ignore Bush Treasury Department role in last year's AIG bailouts, notwithstanding bonus packages

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by captfoster2 (March 17, 2009 10:43 pm ET)
         

      Oh... poor ole Hannity... constantly being schooled on those few rare times he makes the mistake of bringing someone on his pathetic little show that is not a complete suck-up!

      When will Sean learn? Scratch that... who cares!

      While I won't dispute that Geithner may have known about the potential for the bonuses occurring (as they seem to be about to happen)... it sounded to me, based on the video clip that Sean ran of the TresSec... that Geithner was talking about transparency in any upcoming bailout money.

      I also admit that does not excuse his possibly knowing... but compared to the Bush regime... it is a breathe of fresh air to hear the word transparency having some legitimate meaning.

      When Bush or any of his minions said it... it was a slap in our collective faces...

      Obama and his people... comes across as real. So far.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by LuvLuLu (March 17, 2009 10:46 pm ET)
         

      Lanny Davis has sold his soul to the highest bidder. He tries to hedge his bets by contradicting Hannity and others on the right once in a blue moon.

      It's like how they always describe Dick Morris as a Clinton advisor, like that gives him credibility. Sean Hannity tries to gain credibility by having Lanny Davis on his show as a counterpoint. He's more impotent than Alan Colmes was!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (March 18, 2009 12:09 am ET)
           
        Well , was Morris a Clinton advisor?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 18, 2009 8:07 am ET)
             
          When he wasn't sucking the toes of prostitutes? Maybe.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (March 18, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
               
            Ah, prostitution, another issue that shows the hypocracy of the left, along with other issues as well.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by MrBrown (March 18, 2009 3:48 pm ET)
               

            No more than gay anonymous sex in airport bathroom stalls...? 

            The hipocrisy of the right and their stance against homosexutality.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (March 18, 2009 8:39 am ET)
             
          Until he got fired.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (March 18, 2009 9:03 am ET)
             

           

          Fairlibrul is pretending to playing stupid...check that, she's not pretending.

           

          Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (March 18, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
           
        You are right about him selling his soul, he clearly demonstrated that by his defense of Hillary's Bosnia lies.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (March 17, 2009 11:25 pm ET)
         
      Last time I have a Socialist on the show, sez Hannity....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fairliberal (March 18, 2009 12:07 am ET)
         
      Gee , I thought Fox didn't have any liberals on their shows, that is what I have been consistently told by quite a few people on this site. Oh , I guess they were wrong.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tman418 (March 18, 2009 3:48 am ET)
           
        I'm not exactly sure that by Davis pointing out something to Hannity makes him "liberal". And who on this site, exactly, said that there are "no liberals" on Fox.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (March 18, 2009 9:03 am ET)
             

           

          When you use facts and reality, by default, that makes you a liberal.

           

          Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (March 18, 2009 9:36 am ET)
           

        FL shows once again how to play the part of conservative troll: act as disengenuous as possible.

        Name here in this thread, FL, the number of shows FNC has that are hosted by a liberal, please.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by fairliberal (March 18, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
             
          Shows do not have to hosted by a liberal to present liberal views, there are MANY liberal guests on Fox and regular contributers that present the liberal side of things, Mark Lamont Hill for example, Ellis Hedican, Willie Brown, Jerry Brown, jehmu Greene, the list is long.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by BoboSoetoro (March 18, 2009 12:49 am ET)
         

      Paulson just did what then NY Federal Reserve boss, "Turbo-Tax Timmy" Geithner told him to do.  As the NY Times reported on November 25th, 2008, Geithner was the primary author of the bailout and the go-to-man/liason between AIG and the Treasury. 

      & Chris Dodd put the icing on the cake when he inserted his amendment into the Porkulus Bill last month that exempted AIG executive bonuses from gov't control.  Of course, Dodd's having been the largest recipient of AIG campaign cash last year had nothing to do with it (snicker, snicker).

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brishon (March 18, 2009 4:20 am ET)
           

        You do realize Ben Bernanke was the Head of the Federal Reserve right?

        Chris Dodd's amendment, as pointed out on this site had you not gone directly to criticism, actually limited the bonuses for executive pay. Perhaps you should inform yourself on these matters.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by pros2pros2940 (March 18, 2009 8:17 am ET)
           
        False.......Dodd's amendment was to subject bonuses and salaries to Caps
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Timmee (March 18, 2009 1:54 am ET)
         
      Hannity's MO is to always overshoot....always present the strawman.

      Republicans MUST pretend and think as if the last eight years never happened...because it is direct EVIDENCE that what they BELIEVE simply doesn't work!!!!

      Their amazing power for blaiming things on the previous President seems to have gone away. Clinton was responsible for first half of Bush Administration, Obama for the second.

      These people are cultic lonnies.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (March 18, 2009 8:58 am ET)
         
      Sounded to me that Geithner was talking abut bank bailouts. AIG is not a bank and its bailout is handled somewhat differently. I like how Hannity despises the NY Times, but will use its article when it fits his agenda. He is such a putz and I cannot believe anyone takes him serious. I also just love how all these pundits act liek they were sitting in on all these early bailout meetings and know exactly what was discussed. Idiots!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      Report Abuse