About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Hannity applauds congressional Republicans for finally using the "S-word"

March 25, 2009 5:02 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by harley (March 25, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
         

       

      The reality is that all these radical right-wingers really want to use the N-word.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by RABBITLUVR (March 25, 2009 5:08 pm ET)
           
        Or a slight variation of the S-word... call it the S-C word. Same thing in their sick minds.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (March 25, 2009 5:08 pm ET)
         

      Well, they're just following their true leaders: Limbaugh, Hannity, Malkin, etc.

      We can stop calling them the party of NO and call them the party of HATE radio.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (March 25, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
         
      What I would really like to see, since elections do have consequences, and since the democrats won big in 2006, and in 2008, I'd like for Congressional democrats to start completely and utterly marginalizing republicans. Shut them out. If they're going to throw bombs, guess what? We're going to not involve you in anything.

      Obama should (but won't, because he's a better man than I am) do the same thing. I would like to see him sort of say, you want to insult me with these claims of communism and socialism, guess what? You're out. You're marginalized. You lost, and right now, you mean nothing.

      Heck, it's what the republicans did to democrats from 1994-2006, so turn about is more than fair play in this case.

      But, as I said above, Obama, and I think Congressional democrats are better than that, and they'll still try to work with these a-holes.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (March 25, 2009 11:02 pm ET)
           

        I won't sign on with being "better than" helping the country in the most effective manner.  We suffer whenever a republican isn't marginalized.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by roxman (March 25, 2009 5:27 pm ET)
         

      Hannity and his sleaze bag crew can’t stand the fact that their ideas are now passé. They are throwing all these repulsive names at Obama because they are so angry he won the election (and they can’t do a damn thing about it)! They are such crybabies!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by RABBITLUVR (March 25, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
           
        These are uncharted waters for the wingnut crew. They have no clue on how to deal with their predicament. Soon they will slam into the iceberg... right when one of them slips up and blurts out the N-word. Kaboom...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (March 25, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
         

      I just had to click the audio clip, to see what the "S-word" was...

      But before the clip even finished playing, I had an answer to the woman's question:

      ARTICLE 2, Section 1. 
      The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.       

      ...and if the woman needs a more specific answer than that, then she needs to ask a more specific question: otherwise, we'll see you in Court I guess.

      And I wanted to know what the "S-word" was, because I had the strangest most out of the way inkling that maybe it was "Social Security": as in maybe what it was that Congressional Republicans were finally talking about (again) was privatizing the Social Security Trust Fund.

      Privatizing the Social Security Trust Fund: who in the past has propossed that brilliant idea, and are they still talking that trash?

      Imagine if those Policy geniuses, George W. Bush prime among them, had gotten their way and privatized the Social Security Trust Fund... where would we be now?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Dem02020 (March 25, 2009 5:50 pm ET)
           

        ...and I'm not sure who it was that the woman was asking the stupid Constitutional question of: was it the Secretary of the Treasury?

        If so, and even if not so, the respondent should have laughed, maybe even giggled uncontrollably...

        Woman: "Why are you laughing? What, are you Punch Drunk?"

        Man: "No... no lady, I'm just laughing because I suddenly realized I forget to wear my Supreme Court Justice robe to this hearing... I didn't realize you were going to ask me stupid questions about interpreting the U.S. Constitution... that's my other job, on weekends: teaching the Constitution to the learning disabled. I'm sorry lady, if you thought I was laughing at you... actually check that: I'm not sorry lady, because I was laughing at you!"

        Report Abuse
    • Author by paganpunk2199 (March 25, 2009 8:14 pm ET)
         
      Wait a minute, are Repubs beginning to question the President taking on new powers?? WTF?!? What about the last EIGHT YEARS of Dubya giving the Office of the President new powers in the "War on Terror"? What about the fact that basically for the last eight years the country was basically ran from the Vice-President's office? Now they are getting outraged over new powers being given to the President, what hypocrits.
      Report Abuse