O'Reilly still attacking the "far left, character assassin group" Media Matters
April 08, 2009 9:07 pm ET
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
O'Racist never whines about the countless reich-wing smear websites that monitor and smear so-called librul journalists. More fake outrage from o'racist. No big surprise.
I don't think I've read every single item MM has published, but of the ones I have read, I've never once seen the expression "Kill him! Kill him!" appear in those items, or even in the comments under those items: not directed at this jerk o'reilly, or at any country and western singer either.
If you have a brain, and you give the matter some thought, you will admit that people who argue and debate in fantastic exaggerations ("Kill him!") and make for imagined examples (like about a C&W singer) and otherwise invent language and arguments that truly don't exist in the matter, those people who do that stuff, they surrender their credibility and forfeit their argument, don't they?
I mean, if you think you're right and you're debating the point, wouldn't you just stick to facts and accurate quotations in making your argument, versus descending into fantastic imagined made up stuff, like this jerk o'reilly seems to favor doing?
That jerk o'reilly, he could have searched MM's extensive archives for an actual case of where they cited a C&W singer and wrote "Kill him!" about the guy or gal, but seeing as no such stuff has ever appeared in these pages (I don't believe), then the jerk just imagines something like it, and makes it up, and uses that fantasy of his in his argument...
What does that say about his argument, and about his credibility?
Even insane delusionals would probably know better, and check their imaginations, if they were arguing from a position they knew to be right, and knew to be factual.
Eminiem has made fun of Bill Clinton before. O'Reilly is making baseless claims that if some conservative artist made fun of Hillary Clinton in a song that it wouldn't be controversial.
I think Eminem sucks, personally, but O'Reilly is acting like Eminem is this political force for the left when he clearly isn't. He then brings MMFA into it for no apparent reason as if it had something to do with Eminem (and falsely claims that it goes after only conservative pundits).
O'Reilly is not making any sense here. So yes, O'Reilly bashing is appropriate here.
I highly doubt that if Hillary Clinton replaced Sarah Palin in Eminem's video things would be any different.
And we will happily commence bashing...
Billy is so..................he's just so.............
bashable.
Is Eminem a conservative, axis sally?
faillibrul, nice attempt to be just as irrelevant as O'Racist's rant. Eminem is musician who parodys other people. That has been his career. O'Racist just a few months ago had a meltdown because many outlets covered his disguisting comments about Helen Thomas. O'Racist claimed it was a "parody", so it shouldn't have received attention. Yet , Eminem has a made a career of parody, but O'Racist wants everyone to "report" on such parody. All you reich-wingers are senseless....completely.
I think what the problem is: Billy has his underwear on too tight today...
You can see him squirming. He's obviously uncomfortable.
This cuts off circulation to his sewer--I mean his brain.
The Billy circus!!
MORE ICE TEA, M'FER!