Limbaugh says his friend believes "Obama is terrorist attack number 2; Obama is the follow-up to 9-11"

Let's say the story he's telling is true. Let's say that he did have fifteen people over for whatever purpose and they did talk about who Obama's puppet master is.

The discussion of that kind of topic would fit because most of them are used to bowing down to some kind of master themselves. The talking points that come out of the right are too harmonized to not be from some central source. So that kind of framework is their reference point.

You know if there should be an attack of any kind in the U.S., or even outside the U.S. like at an Embassy of ours, the first thing I'm going to think is that the attack is political in nature, and that it's trying to shift the political balance in the U.S. right now (that's what terror is, it's a political weapon)... I'm going to think an attack in the U.S. is meant to harm or even destroy President Obama's political fortunes (which are great presently) and the political fortunes of Democrats in Congress as well (also great at the present time)... 

Now, who would want to do that, who would want to destroy the President's political capital with the American People, and even that of Congressional Democrats too... who would want to see an attack against the American People, on President Obama's watch? 

What's the little Latin question, that that Judge (mentioned by Cicero) used to ask aloud, in trying to solve the mystery of who might have done some heinous thing... cui bono?