About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Time requisitions piece by Coulter on Palin, Brzezinski says she "lov[es]" the pairing

April 30, 2009 11:29 am ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Time's Stengel says magazine selected writers for their "special insight" on their subject

Coulter's piece for Time.

Flashback: Coulter fired from National Review Online after saying of Muslims on September 13, 2001: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (April 30, 2009 11:46 am ET)
         
      I guess blindness is a form of "special insight..."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by PurpleState (April 30, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
         

      Re: The Time piece.

      Only Coulter, she of the ego bigger than Mount Olympus and a voting record like the Exxon Valdez, could make herself entry #79A in the Time 100.

      Coulter: "The only thing I have against (Palin) is that she threatens to surpass me in attracting the left's hatred."

      Unbelievable.  Coulter, eat a celery stalk and choke on it.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by harley (April 30, 2009 12:05 pm ET)
         

       

      Palin and Coulter....the two most irrelevant "humans" in politics.  Great pairing.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by JJF (April 30, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
         

      I was a Time subscriber for more than 35 years, going back to high school.  I read it religiously, every week.  When they did a puff-piece cover story on Coulter a couple of years ago, I cancelled my subscription. 

      I don't miss it.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtwmd1230 (April 30, 2009 12:26 pm ET)
         
      "Coulter on Palin" . . . and Mika wants to make it a threesome.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by womzilla (April 30, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
         

      Coulter wasn't fired by the National Review for her column. She was fired because when they dropped her column for a week, she viciously bad-mouthed them to everyone who would listen. That's right--saying the US should declare war on 15% of humanity for the crime of being Muslim won't get you fired by the National Review, but saying nasty things about the editor will.

       

       

      Report Abuse