Dobbs responds to suggestion that Obama would nominate a woman by asking if that would be "the death of meritocracy on the court"
May 01, 2009 8:20 pm ET


The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles|
|
||
![]() |
||
A "Woman," not a "Women."
And yes, Lou, it would, because
A. Every President always picks the Most Qualified person to fill a vacancy on the court. It never has to do with ideology or politics. Ever. And..
B. The Most Qualified person could never, EVER be a woman. I mean, the very thought is just hysterical. Which I guess explains the stupid grin on Dobbs's face.
<end sarcasm>
Honestly -- how is this uninformed, ignorant jackass still on the air?
What an insightful set of responses! No sirree! We're not going to be fooled by any dumb old Conservatives are we? Picking one supposedly qualified nominee over another because of their race or gender ... there's nothing wrong with that is there?
Whomever he picks, (I mean after all, this is Obama we're talking about), has got to be better than any of those intellectually deficient ignoramuses that voted 9-0 to overturn the Florida Supreme Court for accepting Al Gore's appeal to have only those districts in which the odds were that if any new votes were added they would tend to accumulate in his favor by a rate of 2 - 1. As long as they agree with the audience of MMFA and always vote in favor of the Leftwing point of view, no matter what the law may say they'll be the best picks ... right?