Bruce on Rudov's argument about mothers' weight loss: "I don't think it's been made, perhaps, for a couple millennia"
May 04, 2009 9:04 pm ET


Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts|
|
||
![]() |
||
Maybe I'm just tired or just not paying attention...
One thing I do get is that BillO and Marc Rudov speaking about women is as creepy sounding as talking to Doctor Lector about New York strip steak that he prepared... yes... it's that creepy!
How exactly does this count as misinformation?
It seems like MMFA has been posting a few too many of these random clips lately where one of the hosts says something that's only borderline sexist/racist/inaccurate without explaining what's misinformative about them. Even the ones that are blatantly offensive aren't necessarily information. People like Limbaugh and O'Reilly are TRYING to say things that are controversial or offensive (especially to liberals). What exactly does posting clips from them without explanation do besides give them publicity?
We don't have a lot of national airwaves. Rudov shouldn't be allowed on any of them. Or Bruce. Or O'Reilly.
I think Rudov's making an interesting point, but I think he's on an unnecessary soapbox and I don't understand what argument she's talking about and why it's funny that it hasn't been made in a couple of millennia?
The dude's critiquing all media and she comes back with "we're in an image based society".
This is a pointless clip.