About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

CBS' Schieffer to Justice Souter: "I'll be honest: I didn't care for his attitude ... I've never known anyone who ever saw him outside the court"

May 10, 2009 5:46 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer's "weekly commentary":

Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer's "weekly commentary," as posted on the CBS News website:

Don't Let The Court House Door Hit You

(CBS) Weekly commentary by CBS Evening News chief Washington correspondent and Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer.

David Souter may be the quietest and most low-key man ever to serve on the Supreme Court. He has made it official: He is retiring to return to the New Hampshire woods from whence he came.

By all accounts, he was a good Justice, thoughtful, reasonable.

For sure he was the surprise to the man who nominated him, the George Bush, who thought he was picking a conservative only to discover he had chosen a liberal. But these things happen sometimes when people get jobs for life.

I had no problem with the Justice's legal work. But as one who has lived 40 years in Washington, I'll be honest: I didn't care for his attitude.

He made it no secret that he hated the city, once describing his work as the best job in the world in the worst city in the world.

Another time he called life here "akin to an intellectual lobotomy."

Really? Our nation's capital? One of the most beautiful cities in the world?

Call me corny, but I have to confess, I've run into some pretty smart people here over the years, but then again I tried to get to know the city and its inhabitants. Who wouldn't if you were going to live in a place? Justice Souter, obviously.

I've never known anyone who ever saw him outside the court. But now he's leaving. I take it he won't miss Washington - but my guess is Washington will hardly miss him.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by juliajayne (May 10, 2009 6:03 pm ET)
      10  
      I've never known anyone who ever saw him outside the court. But now he's leaving. I take it he won't miss Washington - but my guess is Washington will hardly miss him.

      Now Bob, as a fellow lone wolf and misanthropic scalywag myself, I admire Souter's independent mind in particular, and his unwilliness to be a part of the beltway horde of whores in general. You and your beltway cohorts could well use a page from his book.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (May 10, 2009 7:43 pm ET)
        4  
        Just a guess, jj, but the beltway cocktail parties and coziness between the corporate media and the lobbyist/politicians in D.C. have not served the country well and continue to contribute to the laziness of reporting real news in favor of trivia and spin-doctor nonsense.

        Bob Schieffer sees himself no doubt as an old fashioned news reporter but reading his autobiography, I was struck by the last chapters in which his excitement about the Monica dress story made him appear to really have lost his perspective, unconscious of what people outside the beltway need to hear about.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne (May 10, 2009 8:06 pm ET)
          3  
          The beltway media have become one big, solipsistic enterprise devoted to alternately amusing themselves and their cronies, and/or making money for themselves and their corporate masters. Their breathless and non stop coverage of Monicagate (among other trivial pursuits) just melds seamlessly into their well heeled cocktail party gossip circuit, and they nary seem to be aware that they're not at the party anymore once they get into their studios.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (May 10, 2009 8:24 pm ET)
            3  
            It's quite the incestuous bunch. 'Ole Jefferson Smith at least had the cynical beltway reporters pulling for him at the end...

            nowadays, the cynical beltway reporters worry about their makeup and which tuxedo to wear at the next important function. And, let's see...which right-wing talking point shall we discuss tonight?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by carlileb5935 (May 10, 2009 11:04 pm ET)
              1  
              The idiocy here, too, is to claim that Souter was a "liberal." Hardly. He was just a reasonable moderate-- it showsn you how right wing the country has become when two Republican court appointees are called liberals.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by carlileb5935 (May 10, 2009 11:04 pm ET)
              1  
              The idiocy here, too, is to claim that Souter was a "liberal." Hardly. He was just a reasonable moderate-- it shows you how right wing the country has become when two Republican court appointees are called liberals.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (May 10, 2009 6:30 pm ET)
      8  
      Damn! Old man Schieffer exposes himself as something that no one today would like to be considered: the ultimate inside-the-beltway DC medis Villager!

      LOL, we remind me to never take anything Schieffer was to say very seriously if he honestly was not able to detect that Souter was talking about the poison political environmnet in DC.

      Seemed like that was pretty low-handing intellectual fruit to be picked but Schieffer missed it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (May 11, 2009 12:16 am ET)
        3  
        I thought that "one of the most beautiful cities in the world?" was a pretty strange interpretation myself. As if the remark had to do with the city's architecture or something.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mk3872 (May 11, 2009 1:35 am ET)
          1  
          it was kinda like Schieffer was playing the role of the DC chamber of commerce ... seemed like next move was to send Souter a nice glossy pamphlet with pictures of the Potomac river.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by MB (May 10, 2009 10:04 pm ET)
      1  
      I have to admit that, aside from the snotty little dig at the end, I can read Scheiffer in a way that isn't awful. Truly, DC *is* a fantastic city. And there are thousand and thousands of brilliant and interesting people here. Now I think you'll be hard pressed to find them amongst the DC press corp, but it doesn't change the fact that DC is a city beyond the hill, a city with a vibrant cultural and intellectual life. Just as we were past tired of hearing W talk about a "real America" as if DC weren't, so to can I imagine Scheiffer being annoyed with Souter calling out a city that he's never really engaged.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (May 11, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
           
        Seems like you, just as Schieffer did, missed the real point of Souter's comments. He probably enjoys the people, walkways & restaurants just fine.

        The beltway hyper-partisan mentality and media obsessives like Schieffer is what he was referring to.

        So it is no suprise that someone who has been there for 40 years like Schieffer would take offense.

        Point is, that Schieffer taking offense is probably appropriate as Souter was zinging people of his ilk.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (May 11, 2009 12:12 am ET)
      1  
      It doesn't seem like all that long ago that everyone was in awe of McCain's (expired) status as a "maverick", as someone who doesn't base their actions on the approval of anyone else (*cough*PALIN*cough*). But now a justice, someone who should theoretically be as objective and non-partisan as possible, is supposed to give a rat's hindquarter about fitting in with the Washington establishment. Why?

      Is this really something that trumps his actual performance? Seriously, this reads as "you're great at what you do, but you don't care for the city I've lived in for forty years, so good riddance." Brilliant work, Bob.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (May 11, 2009 12:40 am ET)
        2  
        Great commentary Bob,

        Imagaine that!! Bob Schieffer doesn't know anyone who's seen him outside the court!! Ooh, alert the media.

        Well.

        And we thought you were just some tired old fart form Face The Nation. We had no idea of your gossip potential.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (May 11, 2009 1:30 am ET)
      3  
      I had no problem with the Justice's legal work. But as one who has lived 40 years in Washington, I'll be honest: I didn't care for his attitude. -Shieffer

      What a petty thing to say about Souter. As an attorney, I admired Souter. So what if he doesn't like Washington D.C.? I don't really like it either: too many politicians, too many phonies and never a place to park. I think Bob needs to retire. Talk about somebody that knows nothing but his work; maybe Souter was the same way.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RABBITLUVR (May 11, 2009 10:47 am ET)
      1  
      Jesus Christ, Bob, why are you sullying your legacy with this garbage? So Souter doesn't like DC... can't blame him as I live here as well and it IS a hellhole in many ways... and you don't like it? You lost a lot of my respect, sir, with your whiny petulant 'commentary'.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (May 11, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
      1  
      Wow. Talk about unprofessional. What does any of that have to do with Souter as a Supreme Court Justice?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by RABBITLUVR (May 11, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
           
        Zip, that's what, which makes Schieffer's shot all the more ridiculous. Did Souter do something to personally offend Bob? Where was Bob when W was standoffish when it came to the DC culture scene? Hmmmm...
        Report Abuse

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace