About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck argues that gay marriage would allow for siblings to marry, if "they're both fixed" and can't procreate

May 12, 2009 2:59 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by jonesjax2374 (May 12, 2009 3:06 pm ET)
      6  
      Lets see...Limbaugh rants about PERVERSIONS, and GODLESSNESS, and this clown talking about incest...O'Reilly talking about bestiality. Gee I wonder why the GOP has lost touch with the American People? What could it be? What person with half a brain would listen to these raving hatemongers? And Limbaugh says WE'RE afraid? LOL!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (May 12, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
        3  
        Notice that as off the wall as they are, they are all on the same page day after day? Goebbles would be proud of them.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (May 12, 2009 3:45 pm ET)
          4  
          I realize that both sides have their talking points, but the Republicans are so obvious about it.

          The sad part is that their arguments are incredibly lame, yet they all recite them in unison as if they've had an epiphany of stupidness.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 12, 2009 4:40 pm ET)
            1  
            We can call it a Stupiphany.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (May 12, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
            1  
            That might be a good title for a book Nerzog...

            The Epiphany of Stupidness: The Story of Modern Conservatism
            Report Abuse
    • Author by dimes (May 12, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
      3  
      What is this weird obsession Glenn Beck has with incest?

      “I kissed my sister. First our lips met, seconds later our tongues. I ran my fingers through her silky hair and felt her soft skin. It was the height of passion and the moment I knew who my true love was . . . We knew we had done something so wrong, but at the same time, something so very right.”

      It's really creepy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (May 12, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
        2  
        Maybe we should start by having Beck "fixed".
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 12, 2009 4:42 pm ET)
        1  
        Maybe Amazon can sell Glenn's fantasy alongside Lynne Cheney's lesbian novel Sisters as a two-fer.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Leftym0m79 (May 12, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
      1  
      BETWEEN 2 CONSENTING ADULTS you hill
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Leftym0m79 (May 12, 2009 3:48 pm ET)
         
      I hit the wrong button...damn technology.

      BETWEEN 2 CONSENTING ADULTS you conservative kook. This slippery slope argument is at once hilarious as it is telling. I pray that by the time my son is old enough to vote that this will be a non issue and this period of time will be look back on as we look back at McCarthyism.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by adamsinclair0078312 (May 12, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
         
      Definition of marriage by Merriam-Webster:
      1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2): the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage <same-sex marriage> b: the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock c: the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
      2: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected ; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
      3: an intimate or close union
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eniobob2631 (May 12, 2009 4:08 pm ET)
      1  
      And they complained about Wanda,Go figure.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 12, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
      1  
      Given the choice of the stauts quo versus allowign both Gay, Plural AND Sibling marriage - provided we limit all to CONSENTING ADULTS - I think I'd still opt for the latter. These guys act with such outrage but bottom line? I'm inclined to shrug my shoulder at it. I don't feel the need to outlaw what anyone else does just becuase it don't float my boat. If it doesn't harm me? (And it DOESN'T!) Ain't none of my business, OR the gov't's.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (May 12, 2009 4:28 pm ET)
        1  
        You would think that the cons would see it that way with all the personal freedom rhetoric they're always spouting but I guess that only applies to making money and avoiding taxes.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 12, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
          1  
          I guess a libertarian will be defined from now on as a Republican who wants to smoke dope and screw his sister.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (May 12, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
      1  
      It wouldn't actually but why would I care if they did?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by loonz (May 12, 2009 4:28 pm ET)
         
      I don't know why a brother and sister would want to get married but who am I to say they can't.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (May 12, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
        1  
        There are millions of brothers and sisters out there who are just dying to get married...

        There tired of being discriminated against!!

        NewsMax just did a study. As soon as a few more states have gay marriage, there is going to be tidal wave of pressure for sibling marriage.

        You might call this forgotten group a silent minority/majority. There out there. Millions of them.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by loonz (May 12, 2009 4:40 pm ET)
         
      Why are conservatives against incestuous marriage, polygamy or marriage between human and animal? I don't think they've ever answered that question; they're always asking us.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pros2pros2940 (May 12, 2009 4:50 pm ET)
      1  
      Clearly these people are incapable of any rational thought
      Report Abuse
    • Author by crazyconservative (May 12, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
         
      The point being made is that any person you want to marry could be argued for. I honestly believe that marriage should not be stipulated by the government. The government needs to get out of our lives. People should be able to choose whoever they want to be the recipient of their healthcare or other benefit. Government should just state this and leave all else alone... but then I'm just a crazy conservative.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (May 12, 2009 6:22 pm ET)
         
      Ah Glenn, some how in your brain two married men or two women are going to somehow create a viable fetus between two people of the same sex. Then bring it to term to produce a child composed only of their DNA.
      The mechanics of this are a mystery too me. I'm not sure a YY chromozomed individual is viable either. Men have an X chromozome. Is it possble to live and mature without one?
      Report Abuse