Gallagher compares "scandal" of Notre Dame inviting Obama with Columbia allowing Ahmadinejad to speak
May 18, 2009 7:30 am ET


Media Matters: The right-wing media's election analysis just ain't that good
The Friday Rush: For conservatives, $400 million buys defeat at the ballot box
The myth of Fox News' ratings spike|
|
||
![]() |
||
Watch out, Red Hatters. You're the one they'll set their sights on after they lose this one!
Please,what a maroon.The church has a great track record for life?
Tsk,tsk Gallagher,you don't know your own church's history.Please stop talking,you only sound dumber and dumber the more you speak.
Anything is a scandal nowadays.So sad,where were these crys for morality during the African genocides?If you want anyone to take you serious,take up serious issues faux news.
Who is this Mike Gallagher that you dare put him on as if he is some kind of authority figure on this or any other political subject?
Seriously? Other than the zombie's that watch this worthless channel already... who else would actually listen to Gallagher's words?
-Noam Chomsky
This could be strengthened if it can be shown that these protesters did not object to Bush speaking. Many pro-life people do cross over to the anti-capital punishment cause,(Bill O'Reilly is a prominent example.)
It's been many years but I don't recall Bush's alleged mocking of a condemned prisoner being quite so cut and dried when the matter was part of the 2000 Presidential campaign. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
http://www.slate.com/id/2131451/
Please stand corrected.
Before you know it, they have their own TV shows.
Condemned prisoners are adults whose right to life has been respected by making the removal of that right a difficult process that can only be pursued for very limited reasons by very limited bodies authorized to do so. Also it is for conscious, most often deliberate actions by those adults, and most often actions that have had consequences as great or greater than those being suffered by the convict.
There currently is no such protection for the fetus. The fetus is being terminated without having done anything to justify this treatment. It has had no opportunity to defend its life, even through a proxy.
So in the case of the fetus, its alleged "right to live" is being withdrawn without due process. In the case of the condemned prisoner, the "right to live" cannot be withdrawn without due process.
Though the Catholic Church does not recognize this distinction, most Protestant denominations do and most Protestant denominations leave this determination to the conscience of the individual.
Um, yeah, that exactly what he's doing. It's like saying Fox likes to interview right wing morons--but I'm not comparing him to a right wing moron.
The similarity was not between these two Presidents, but between the two universities. In both cases, honor, or an honor, was conveyed that helped the speaker and contradicted the values of the institution. He was talking about the institution and his comparison was that this was the same argument used to defend Columbia's invitation to Iran's President. As it often does, MMFA misrepresented the comments saying that the scandals were being compared rather than that an argument presented in the debates over the scandals was being compared. Relisten to the clip and you will hear this for yourself. An MMFA lie even the most devoted Leftist can recognize.
"The similarity was not between these two Presidents, but between the two universities. In both cases, honor, or an honor, was conveyed that helped the speaker and contradicted the values of the institution."
_____________________________________________________________
Ahmedinejhad was given an honorary degree? I hadn't heard . . . and, how familiar are you with the "values" of CU? Are you an alum? IMHO, the values of CU -- or ND, or any institution of higher learning -- are likely to include a desire for the free and open exchange of ideas . . . and, for that exchange to occur, that means talking to and hearing from people whose ideas differ from ours . . .
_________________________________________________
"As it often does, MMFA misrepresented the comments saying that the scandals were being compared rather than that an argument presented in the debates over the scandals was being compared. Relisten to the clip and you will hear this for yourself. An MMFA lie even the most devoted Leftist can recognize."
___________________________________________________
I must say, I have NEVER heard of someone who had as much disdain for this site as you do constantly post here . . .
This is the medieval state of people like Randall Terry, the man who hounded Mr. Schiavo, the man who stopped the anti-abortion movement in its tracks. You know, I saw Mark Rudd giving a talk on C-Span about all the mistakes his generation made in changing SDS to the Weathermen. Simply put, they stopped organizing and trying to change opinions; instead, they tried to prove how militant they were. The result was the Nixon landslide. Under the SDS, the ranks kept growing. The Weathermen scared people off and shrank the supporters. Probably missed a chance to end the war.
But that's fine. It's a coherent point of view that they have every right to try to convince people to adopt. They don't have the right to call it equivalent to murder, because many people do not accept this theological view. Nor have Catholics always accepted it.