About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh criticizes Schwarzenegger for supporting Obama's emissions proposal

May 19, 2009 3:12 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

From the May 19 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: Now I want to play for you a sound bite. There's a big argument going on in the Republican Party over what we must be. We have to be a big-tent party. We have to allow all kinds of people and various divergent points of view. We must let the moderates run the party -- they do now, by the way. The moderates run the Republican Party -- make no mistake about it. We must become more moderate if we are to engage in electoral victory. And so here you have a radical liberal Democrat president -- the most radical liberal in the nation's history -- proposing every day programs that will destroy the essence of America.

Here we have the governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, agreeing with this. And Arnold is what's being called a moderate Republican, somebody that we must -- we need more people like Arnold Schwarzenegger in our party if we are to grow the party.

Now, I ask you: How are we going to grow the party if more and more moderate Republicans are going to suck up to Barack Obama, show up at his public appearances, endorse him, and campaign for him? How in the hell does that expand the Republican Party. You tell me how this is a recipe for expanding the Republican Party.

SCHWARZENEGGER [audio clip]: We brought everyone together, and now we created one standard which is going to help everybody. I want to congratulate the president, because other administrations previously have tried to do that and were not successful. There was a lot of dialogue about reducing greenhouse gasses and making the cars more efficient, but no action. This president, after 120 days in office, has created the action and brought everyone together.

LIMBAUGH: They've had no choice, Arnold. They've had no choice. It's this or jail. It's this or bankruptcy. It's this or get fired. Join him or get fired. So, anyway, this is what we must do, ladies and gentlemen. We need more Arnold Schwarzeneggers. This is the future. Well, this is what our moderates are telling us. We don't need to do battle with Obama; we need to go after the American people the same way he does. There's the future of the Republican Party right there: Arnold Schwarzenegger. That's what the moderates are telling us.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 19, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
      2  
      *cough* I know, because *cough, cough* why on earth would we *wheeze* want to breath clean air *cough* and live in a *wheeze* habitable climate? *cough*

      Putting aside that this will SAVE the US Auto industry by effectively taking away one of Toyota and Honda's big competetive advatages: better fuel economy. And it will stabalize gas prices.

      Moron.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by liberalpitbull (May 19, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
         
      He's just a shill for corporate America. Ignore. Here's a guy that got a contract for exactly the same amount of money Clear Channel had to save by cutting thousands of jobs.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by o rly (May 19, 2009 4:00 pm ET)
         
      Did he actually say "the moderates run the Republican party"?

      LMAO
      Report Abuse
    • Author by peace4all (May 19, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
      2  
      sorry, this is kind of OT but i listen to rush almost every day for the 1st hour while i'm at lunch and have been noticing that if you listen to his commercials he seems to have alot to buy either gold or the new one i heard today is non-hybrid seeds for growing you own food. kind of looks like rush's audience is maybe made up of the militia and survivalists. but maybe i am just wishing for that to be so.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jmh (May 19, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
      1  
      a little more off topic:
      Don't the Limbaugh-naughts and Republi-dunces get the irony that if auto companies had been a _little bit_ proactive in the last __Thirty-Eight Years__ we would not be in the position of needing this round of government intervention (as it were) in setting fuel standards and the like.... it is the failed Market Economy that has produced remediating government policy formation.

      I wish I could have been a fly on the wall at the Auto Company Board meetings where-in the policy was stated: Oh, the public will never go in for fuel efficient vehicles, Doh!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (May 19, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
          2
        Please tell me, how is the Hybrid car selling going. I would say if the government had gotten out of the way a long time ago they would be fine today. The more the government gets involved, the more a industry suffers.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by losingfaith (May 19, 2009 6:28 pm ET)
          1  
          Hybrid car sales are booming. Why are you even debating this when you obviously have nothing to back you up but your own opinion, that was given to you by someone else?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jmh (May 20, 2009 12:36 pm ET)
             
          The problem is that the current "free" market mechanisms are still
          too short sighted...(not to mention too often blind-sided by un-fettered greed)
          so, government _has_ to step in... and it is not like the current wave of energy crisis issues ( for want of better terminology) wasn't clearly, obviously, looming on the horizon for half a century.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by seeryer (May 19, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
      1  
      Rush,
      How well is the gas guzzling Hummer doing these days? You think the emphasis on the guzzling SUV led to some of the problems the auto industry is experiencing today? No way, it is the UAW and the liberals who represent Michigan and Detroit right?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (May 19, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
          1
        And tell me, how much hay, livestock, grain can you haul in a Smart Car, see, the more you push for smaller cars the more you hurt the individuals that need trucks. Thanks alot for hurting the working class.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by losingfaith (May 19, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
          1  
          You need a luxury car to haul around farming supplies? I don't see anywhere that seeryer was referring to anything but the Hummer. Of course you can't debate that point, so you make something else up to debate. Do you think it's imppossible to make a more fuel efficient work truck? Do you even try to debate or are you only interested in saying anything contrary in a lame attempt to make people angry?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Daryl A. (May 19, 2009 10:47 pm ET)
             
          Yeah we couldn't possibly make fuel efficient truck. Everyone at the rodeo would laugh at you.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by markbfoot199 (May 19, 2009 5:35 pm ET)
        1
      Let me see, California, the state that has L.A. better know as smog city. Yea, California really should not lead the way in anything when it comes to government. They are going broke because they do not know how to spend wisely, they have hospitals closing daily because of individuals not paying their bills, they have out of control real estate cost, they have out of control spending, they have the highest cost of gasoline because they requires so many blends, they have people moving out of the state daily because the cost of living is so high, so yea, why would we want to follow California. Thanks to this new bill they are trying to pass, they will hurt the automobile industry even more.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by losingfaith (May 19, 2009 6:36 pm ET)
        1  
        Hmmmm, seems to me the Governator is following the President, as demonstrated with his own words. Your entire rant here is pointless.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Daryl A. (May 19, 2009 10:55 pm ET)
           
        Like war in Iraq out of control spending? or Presidential library out of control spending?

        Mark people move out of every state daily. L.A. has a high gasoline price because everywhere has a high gasoline price. Not to mention LA has one the weakest public transportation systems of any major city. We the people must form ourselves around saving the planet. If you break your arm you don't just pretend its not there... you fix it (like a cast), and your other arm accommodates until its healed.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Daryl A. (May 19, 2009 10:44 pm ET)
         
      "Essence" doesn't keep the temperature or sea level down Rush.
      Report Abuse