About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

On The View, Goldberg calls Beck "lying sack of dog mess" after he admits he "mischaracteriz[ed]" story

May 20, 2009 12:29 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (May 20, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
      7  
      Poor Glenny. Those mean old Liberal women just beat the crap out of him.

      But, I do have to disagree with Barbara when she refers to Glenn as a "hot talent".

      Hot, maybe, but "talent"? GMAFB
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rmyurick (May 20, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
        2  
        Actually, he may have "talent" (I'd have to see), but he's not all that hot.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Stargnoc (May 20, 2009 5:40 pm ET)
          2  
          I'd have to agree, he's a pudgy red-faced Rush Limbaugh wannabe. He is extremely unappealing in every way.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by bugsbun847 (May 20, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
      6  
      IF it smells like dog mess it probably is.
      Report Abuse
        • Author by thejbomb65 (May 21, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
             
          well done, you fail to address the subject at hand and try to divert attention of your lord and master.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by whillenbrand (May 20, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
      9  
      Glenn Beck has been "bitch slapped" on national TV by 2 very bright and credible women. NOTICE how he does not look at Whoopi except to argue his point. Glad to see his hemroids have cleared up.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dewdrop_8171931 (May 20, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
        9 1
        I noticed that myself. He got OWNED by Whoopi and Barbara Wlaters, and I couldn't have been more excited. I hope they get toomuch hate mailby blind GOP loving housewives. I'm glad someone took Glenn Beck's phony @$$ to task for once.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fairliberal (May 20, 2009 6:15 pm ET)
          1 16
          Beck is in the process of exposing acorn for the fraud that they are, you should pay some attention to that. Isn't it interesting to see how frequently he was interrupted by the 2 ladies, if a Fox anchor had done that they would be criticized severly by the same people who are now applauding the interrupters.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (May 20, 2009 6:52 pm ET)
            12 1
            Yeah keep deluding yourself and next year at this time when NO wrongdoing is found by ACORN perhaps it will finally dawn on you how brainwashed you are and how easy you are to use and program
            Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 20, 2009 7:44 pm ET)
            4  
            Isn't it interesting that he admitted he lied, FL? Or is that not news?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by ivand (May 21, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
              1 2
              Minor detail that doesn't change anything about his story. Ever tell a story? Sometimes you mess up a minor detail. The fact that liberals jump all over him over this is really pathetic. The MAIN point is that Amtrak DID hold the seat. Did Babs refute this? Did mediamatter.org even look up the important part? Of course not.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by thejbomb65 (May 21, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
                1  
                a minor detail? yes very minor that it turned events completly 180 degress.

                Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (May 20, 2009 8:27 pm ET)
            6  
            The only acorn Beck is exposing is the one he stuck up his rear to try and tease the squirrel in there to come back out.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by roundhouse (May 20, 2009 8:47 pm ET)
            5  
            Exposing ACORN? As in investigative journalism? Glenn Beck? He admitted he was no journalist. We're supposed to give a crap about what a commentator, a known liar at that, has to say?

            You're dumber than you seem to be if you believe Beck about anything.

            Chump.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by creeksneakers2 (May 20, 2009 9:31 pm ET)
            4  
            Fox anchors never let their guests get a word in edgewise.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (May 23, 2009 11:00 am ET)
                1
              That is a really ignorant comment, one you cannot support with facts.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by ButteryPat (May 21, 2009 12:47 am ET)
            4 1
            Well, for the most part, I remember him trying to interrupt them and them not letting him. And the things you and Glenn Beck don't know about Acorn could fill volumes.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dynamo (May 23, 2009 7:25 am ET)
                 
              Why don't you prove it and supply the "volumes" of documentation to back up your hot air. Come on, we're waiting! Where are those volumes of incriminating info? zzzzzzzz
              Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (May 23, 2009 11:01 am ET)
                 
              I do know that they are a bunch of thieves who are ripping this country off with the help of the dimocrats. They are in the same league as Madoff.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by thejbomb65 (May 21, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
            1  
            and beck isnt a fraud for lying? on his radio show....and then getting called out on it?

            way to change the subject.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by dynamo (May 23, 2009 7:22 am ET)
               
            HAHAHAHAHAHA What a joke! Just keep spouting off your Beck and Limbutt talking points and expose yourself for the mindless droid that you are. Really, your talking point is outdated and quite frankly as tired as the comment and the commenter.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (May 20, 2009 3:10 pm ET)
        1 12
        Actually you should look again, he is looking at Goldberg the whole time she is speaking and also early in the clip. Should he be looking at Goldberg as Walters is speaking too?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (May 20, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
          11 1
          He's not looking at her. He's looking to the side of her. This is a common trait of kids who have just been caught with their hand in the cookie jar.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (May 20, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
            1 13
            It is also a common trait of kids to make things up, just like you are.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (May 20, 2009 8:28 pm ET)
              6  
              Are you looking in a mirror as you type that?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 21, 2009 10:06 am ET)
              2  
              So, are you saying that Beck is using a "common trait of kids to make things up?" If so, thumbs up!
              Report Abuse
            • Author by thejbomb65 (May 21, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
              1  
              and just like glen beck
              Report Abuse
        • Author by thejbomb65 (May 21, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
          2  
          im wondering why you are defending this clown. he got caught lying and you are sticking up for him. this wasnt some screwed up minor detail of a story, this was him flat out lying to make himself look good.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Leftym0m79 (May 20, 2009 12:51 pm ET)
      7 1
      So Beck admittedly doesn't fact check, isn't a journalist and "misspeaks". lols. Somewhere a liberal fairy just got its wings...or one of seals broke, not quite sure which.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (May 20, 2009 12:51 pm ET)
      12  
      What? Glen Beck lied about how a meeting between himself and Walters/Goldberg on an Amtrak all in the name of selling a story to his brainless listeners...

      He must figure that most of his followers don't watch The View so that many of them would not find out that their man is actually a liar!

      Okay... this is a relatively minor lie, but it is a stone of the entire foundation of his inability to speak much truth.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jonwisby (May 20, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
      5  
      You can't book a ticket on the NYC/WDC train without a reservation. Additionally, it states on the Amtrak website that they assign seats.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Whispers (May 21, 2009 1:53 am ET)
        1  
        Yeah, that's the weird thing about this. Amtrak does indeed make reservations.

        Glenn Beck is really a dishonest person, isn't he?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dynamo (May 23, 2009 7:28 am ET)
             
          EXTREMELY dishonest. And a total windbag to boot. I have gone WDC to NYC and PHILLY and I always had an assigned seat. I paid for it to be that way. Got a paper and coffee with it.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (May 20, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
      14  
      I have always believed that people who willingly lie about small things will just as easily lie about the big things too.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rmyurick (May 20, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
        5  
        Exactly--why bother overheating his sad little brain with such concepts as truthiness?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by highliter (May 20, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
           
        Does the same standard hold for Pres Clinton??
        Report Abuse
    • Author by davemccarthymusic9410 (May 20, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
      7  
      I'm willing to bet that Glenn thinks very highly of the late Joe McCarthy (no relation to me, I hasten to add) He seems to want to emulate that congenital liar. The only difference is that Glenn is, presumably, sober.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ewl94232 (May 20, 2009 5:55 pm ET)
        1 9
        Soviet KGB records showed that all 17 of the people McCarthy accused were Soviet agents. But if you want to actually know if this is a lie, instead of just assuming that it is, you'll have to look it up yourself.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (May 20, 2009 6:55 pm ET)
          9  
          Please the amount of people he accused changed daily according to what figure he was pulling directly out of his rectal database. What about the Army General he accused? How about when he accused Edward R Murrow of being a communist. The man was a liar.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (May 20, 2009 8:36 pm ET)
          5  
          Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public face of a period in which Cold War tensions fueled fears of widespread Communist subversion.[1] He was noted for making claims that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government and elsewhere. Ultimately, McCarthy's tactics and his inability to substantiate his claims led him to be discredited and censured by the United States Senate.

          McCarthy is usually quoted to have said: "The State Department is infested with communists. I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department."

          There is some dispute about whether or not McCarthy actually gave the number of people on the list as being "205" or "57". In a later telegram to President Truman, and when entering the speech into the Congressional Record, he used the number 57.[22] The origin of the number 205 can be traced: In later debates on the Senate floor, McCarthy referred to a 1946 letter that then–Secretary of State James Byrnes sent to Congressman Adolph J. Sabath. In that letter, Byrnes said State Department security investigations had resulted in "recommendation against permanent employment" for 284 persons, and that 79 of these had been removed from their jobs; this left 205 still on the State Department's payroll.

          It's called fact checking, you should try it sometime...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ewl94232 (May 20, 2009 10:35 pm ET)
              5
            McCarthy waved his paper in front of the womens's club and made various statements, including the one to Murrow. He actually only brought formal accusations against a small number of people in the investigation that led to the Army McCarthy hearings. I couldn't remember whether it was eleven or seventeen, so I went for the larger number. He also led some investigations in other agencies he believed had been infiltrated by Communists or their sympathizers and he made numerous comments in support of the investigations and accusations being conducted by others.

            I've never heard that he actually produced the alleged names on the list and remember him being criticized for this. The term, "McCarthyism" was coined about one month after his rise to prominence. I think it's actually the "Venona" papers and their importance lies in combination with the KGB files releases. There are historians that contest the reliability of some to many of those identifications. I have heard that all or most of the persons formally charged by McCarthy are confirmed by the Soviet Files.

            If you really want a reference, here's a passage from Wikapedia. It's short on specific details but in the summary of his Senate career you'll see the very limited nature of McCarthy's involvement in these matters. He was a figure that the Left focussed on and made a symbol out of. Without their condemnation and focus he probably would not have appeared a prominent figure at the time.

            Wikipedia -
            Joseph McCarthy himself headed the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations in 1953 and 1954, and during that time used it for a number of his Communist-hunting investigations. McCarthy first examined allegations of Communist influence in the Voice of America, and then turned to the overseas library program of the State Department. Card catalogs of these libraries were searched for works by authors McCarthy deemed inappropriate. McCarthy then recited the list of supposedly pro-communist authors before his subcommittee and the press. Yielding to the pressure, the State Department ordered its overseas librarians to remove from their shelves "material by any controversial persons, Communists, fellow travelers, etc." Some libraries actually burned the newly forbidden books.[26]
            McCarthy's committee then began an investigation into the United States Army. This began at the Army Signal Corps laboratory at Fort Monmouth. McCarthy garnered some headlines with stories of a dangerous spy ring among the Army researchers, but ultimately nothing came of this investigation.[27] McCarthy next turned his attention to the case of a U.S. Army dentist who had been promoted to the rank of major despite having refused to answer questions on an Army loyalty review form. McCarthy's handling of this investigation, including a series of insults directed at a brigadier general, led to the Army-McCarthy hearings, with the Army and McCarthy trading charges and counter-charges for 36 days before a nationwide television audience. While the official outcome of the hearings was inconclusive, this exposure of McCarthy to the American public resulted in a sharp decline in his popularity.[28] In less than a year, McCarthy was censured by the Senate and his position as a prominent force in anti-communism was essentially ended.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (May 20, 2009 10:47 pm ET)
              5  
              I used wikipedia for my posts as well. Bottom line: he changed his numbers daily, he couldn't make charges stick, and as was pointed out by creeksneakers, a total of 9 out of hundreds.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by robyn20094113 (May 21, 2009 4:09 am ET)
              2  
              He managed to destroy countless lives and careers. His actions took a tole on the health and homes intruded on by their own government that is supose to protect them.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by dynamo (May 23, 2009 7:31 am ET)
                 
              FIRST MISTAKE = trusting WIKI for you research. Wiki is not the be all and end all of factual info. I have found that many descriptions have so many holes in them they look like SWISS CHEESE.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by thejbomb65 (May 21, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
            2  
            well why dont you cite where you pulled this from so your facts can be checked
            Report Abuse
        • Author by creeksneakers2 (May 20, 2009 9:54 pm ET)
          5  
          http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html

          The Verona papers only named 9 people out of the hundreds McCarthy accused as Soviet agents.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (May 20, 2009 10:21 pm ET)
            4  
            You have to admit it, McCarthy was right almost 5% of the time, which is pretty darn good for a Conservative these days.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by thejbomb65 (May 22, 2009 12:04 am ET)
            1  
            get it right its VENONA
            Report Abuse
        • Author by dynamo (May 23, 2009 7:29 am ET)
             
          Destroyed dozens of careers and lives just be accusing people of being Communists. There were hundreds more than 17 people. As usual, repuke garbage.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by tfury (May 20, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
      8  
      "OL Glenny Boy. You have publicly admitted you are an ex-cocaine addict, a Morman, a life commentator, not a journalist, not an investigative reporter, a women hating Republican , a crybaby and an anti-science, anti-enviromentalist. Have I missed anything? This guy is the poster boy for the neocon agenda.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by highliter (May 20, 2009 5:06 pm ET)
          1
        Umm is there something wrong with admitting you’re a Mormon. And Im I have never heard him say he is a women hating republican. As far as a ex cocaine user umm didn’t BO admit to cocaine use?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pbc4446907 (May 20, 2009 1:26 pm ET)
      5  
      The schlock comment inserted when he tried to respond , to put it in a PELOSI "frame"....someone needed to ifor him, NOT EVEN CLOSE for he DOES spittle words glibly, disengenously more often than NOT and Pelosi , especially currently, is getting parsed out of context and ridiculousy, the MSM is encouraging focus on the insignificant rather than the REAL ISSUE which comes back that SHE, Pelosi did NOT authorize nor endorse TORTURE and those that DID ARE ESCAPING RATHER UNSCATHED as IF what they did and endorsed did dsomething for our REAL security in a good way but in reality, NOT !!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kromecom48 (May 20, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
      9  
      This was BEAUTIFUL! The lying sack had to admit he was a lying sack of crap. Elisabeth was noticeably silent since she couldn't defend Fox or Beck at all. Say what you will, these ladies shame the MSM when it comes to confronting wingnuts and liars.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by vesaversa (May 20, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
      4  
      This should a wake call for those conservatives sheeps who think
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (May 20, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
      2 7

      Did someone really call someone else a "lying sack of dog mess"?

      I don't know, because as I watched the video clip I stopped it midway, I couldn't watch the whole thing... it's sad... it's like seeing the bottom of the barrel scraped and presented as public discourse... a media hack like beck, bickering with a couple of strange old hens about Amtrak seating, and about what strangers on a train said to one another.

      Sad.

      I just couldn't sit through the whole movie, but got up and walked out of the theater, before the "doggy doo" part I guess.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by o rly (May 20, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
      6 1
      Beck got totally owned. That's why these arch-conservative hacks don't debate smart liberals, they get completely dominated.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (May 20, 2009 10:23 pm ET)
        3 2
        I wouldn't call anyone on the view a smart liberal, but I agree with the rest of it. Beck is out of his league with the farm club here.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by o rly (May 21, 2009 10:07 am ET)
          1  
          Sorry, I didn't really word that correctly. I meant if the ladies on the view can utterly eviscerate him, it's no wonder he doesn't get into it with smart, informed lefties, who would do even worse to him. These liars get a false sense of ego in the Faux News echo chamber and wide-eyed mainstream media. It's great to see one of them get owned.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by lede39571545 (May 20, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
      6  
      And.....Faux News pays this "lying sack of dog mess" who just got a can of "whoop A.s.s." opened on his butt, big bucks. Money well spent...LOL. Go Ladies of the View.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kickp (May 20, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
      4  
      Mr beck should be ashamed of himself,caught lying on national tv
      by some fine ladies.Back to cable where your idiots congregate!!!!!!!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RABBITLUVR (May 20, 2009 2:22 pm ET)
      7  
      Hasselbeck looks like she'd rather be somewhere - or someone - else.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dewdrop_8171931 (May 20, 2009 2:40 pm ET)
        8  
        So true. She looked as if she were cringing at the mere fact of her beloved Glenny Boy getting owned by her boss and co-worker.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by robyn20094113 (May 21, 2009 4:18 am ET)
        1  
        Like over at Fox sitting on Sean's lap, licking up all his praise, she doesn't even realize he is only using her to be his mouth piece on the View.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by highliter (May 20, 2009 2:41 pm ET)
        14
      You have got to be kidding. You have totally missed the point of the story. The point was not who walked up to who.(Which is totally irrelevant) It was that they had reserved seats on a train that you cannot reserve seats on. The point was to show their elitism and how they think they should be treated better than the rest of the rif raf on the train.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (May 20, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
        14  
        Goldberg and Walters also refuted the lie that they reserved seats. Beck even admitted that the guy actually didn't say that the seats were reserved. Of course, he only admitted that after Whoopi and Barbara handed him his head.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by highliter (May 20, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
            11
          Please tell me where he says he says he was lying about the seats being reserved. He states that a representative of Amtrak tells him that these seats are reserved and that he is going to be excited about who is sitting in them. Whether the seats were reserved in some official capacity or not the fact remains Glenn was told by an Amtrak Rep not to sit there. If that’s not a reserved seat what is.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (May 20, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
            7  
            He didn't admit to lying about the seats but was caught in a lie about Ms. Walters calling him over. So everything that he said is suspect.

            If you are going to ignore his lie and say he was telling the truth about the reservation, they your judgement is suspect.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by highliter (May 20, 2009 4:57 pm ET)
                2
              So you are saying anyone who has ever misspoke is a liar.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by roundhouse (May 22, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
                   
                No. That's what you wish wk was saying. Worrier is saying that Beck was caught lying. Period.


                Report Abuse
            • Author by highliter (May 20, 2009 5:18 pm ET)
                2
              Hrmm actually the issue was if Ms. Walter came over to him or he went to her. Not Ms. Walters calling him over. Did you misspeak or are you a liar?
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Whispers (May 21, 2009 1:57 am ET)
            4  
            So you think that Walters and Goldberg didn't reserve the seats, and yet some anonymous representative from Amtrak told Glenn Beck that they had, in fact, reserved those seats?

            No, Beck simply lied. He lied about whether the reservations existed and he lied about whether Amtrak allows reservations.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by robyn20094113 (May 21, 2009 4:24 am ET)
              2  
              And he lied about them making conversation with him first. It was the other way around, he drug them into conversation first.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (May 21, 2009 4:51 pm ET)
            2  
            He admitted that the guy never said the seats were reserved. They guy had just indicated that Walters and Goldberg were going to sit there.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by dynamo (May 23, 2009 7:37 am ET)
           
        I have news for Highliter (stoned?) AMTRAK does make seating reservations. They have one or two cars on every train that are "BUSINESS CLASS" not coach. You get a bigger/wider seat that swivels and reclines and a complimentary paper and drink.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by PurpleState (May 20, 2009 3:23 pm ET)
      3 3
      I'm sure that Beck is trying to draw a double standard that we're looking at him as a liar, but Steven Colbert and Jon Stewart get passes as comedians.

      Well, guess what, Glenn? You have to start calling yourself a comedian. You have to be funny all of the time.

      And...frankly, you're not that funny anyways.

      Guarantee he's going to rip them a new one, then never be on the show again.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dmhack (May 20, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
        1  
        Doesn't Beck have a comedy tour coming up?
        Guess that means he's a comedian... now that's funny.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 20, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
        4  
        I'm sure that Beck is trying to draw a double standard that we're looking at him as a liar, but Steven Colbert and Jon Stewart get passes as comedians.
        But Stewart and Colbert are on Comedy Central. Beck is on a channel that has "News" in its name. One would think that would be obvious enough for even Beck to know the difference. Too bad even that simple tidbit soars over his empty head.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by john14:6 (May 20, 2009 5:24 pm ET)
        1
      Whoopi, I remember when you were a comedienne.

      Remember In July 2004 when, at a fundraiser for John Kerry at Radio City Music Hall in New York, Goldberg made a sexual joke about President George W. Bush, by waving a bottle of wine, pointing toward her v*gina and saying: "We should keep Bush where he belongs, and not in the White House."

      Or when you had that affair with Ted Danson. He was married right? And Danson experienced substantial negative press attention after his appearance as BLACK SAMBO at a Friar's Club comedy roast in Goldberg's honor, as some guests were said to be angered by the monologue he delivered.However, it should be noted that Goldberg later admitted to writing the skit with him.

      LOL, that was great !!!!!!!!

      Or the time you said that, "the Chinese 'have a very different ...", sorry the filter will not let me finish that one.

      Glenn Beck was doing comedy. You were doing HATE.



      Report Abuse
    • Author by Maeven (May 20, 2009 5:43 pm ET)
         
      Did you notice Elisabeth Hasselbeck's defense of Glen Beck after he got in an off-the-subject slam of Nancy Pelosi with yet another lie about Pelosi ("to use Nancy Pelosi's words, 'I misspoke'", complete with air quotes) -

      ELISABETH HASSELBACK: We should bring Nancy Pelosi in and (what, waterboard her?, as Elisabeth suggested on Mike Huckabee's show on Fox?)


      I couldn't make out the rest of the line out of her mouth, her tinny shrill voice interrupting as Whoopi and Barbara were trying to get some direct responses out of Beck.


      Can anyone else figure out the rest of that line? It's at/about 5:10 on the clip.


      Report Abuse
    • Author by markbfoot199 (May 20, 2009 5:52 pm ET)
        10
      SO, again, were the seats saved? Now what they call a lie is that Barbara did not call him over, what a thin skinned women. SO he say yes you are right I went to her, oh my Goodness he went to her, not being called over. The question still remains, were the seats saved and did he lie about that, that seems to be what has Wopie all upset. Looks like to me these two women are a little upset about whom called whom over, the story was about a saved seat, which still never got answered.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Whispers (May 21, 2009 1:59 am ET)
        4  
        No, the seats were not reserved. That was made clear in the video. Suggest you rewatch.

        "Whoopi and I had a hard time finding seats"

        "Steve Croft couldn't even sit with his wife"

        "You were lying!"

        I think it's pretty safe to infer that there were no reservations.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ewl94232 (May 20, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
      1 12
      This is another silly one. How many of you condemning Beck for misrepresenting or lying, whichever you prefer, about whether Walters called him over or not, thought it was okay for Clinton to lie under oath in a matter relevant to the claimant's charge in a sexual harassment suit?

      How many of you have expressed condemnation of Bill O'Reilly for shouting at a guest, but haven't yet condemned Whoopie Goldberg's crude remarks to her guest?

      How many of you have celebrated what one of you referred to as a "bitch-slap" but haven't noted that Beck showed more courtesy to his hosts than they showed to him?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (May 20, 2009 6:56 pm ET)
          9
        But all of those things are acceptable to them when a lefty does them, they are only offensive when a righty does them. Please you must understand the rules.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (May 21, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
          2  
          Clinton paid a consequence for his dishonesty. So does Beck. His punishment is being called out and embarrassed on The View. It's time for him to move on to his next lie and start the process all over again.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by loonz (May 20, 2009 10:04 pm ET)
        3 1
        "Beck showed more courtesy to his hosts than they showed to him?"

        What else could the liar do?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Craig (May 20, 2009 11:22 pm ET)
          5  
          I noticed that Beck was reasonably courteous when he was face to face with Walters and Goldberg, both on the show and, by all accounts, on the train, but that after each meeting, when they weren't around, he mocked them publicly. That's pretty pathetic.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Whispers (May 21, 2009 2:06 am ET)
            4  
            Exactly. Compare how weasely Beck gets when he's confronted with the disparity between his courtesy on the train and how he decided to mock them on his show. It's classic b.s. stuff. "But I knew I was going to come on the show!" So that makes it OK that he lied? From my perspective, it makes it seem a bit more pathological.

            I'm sure he knows many of his Fox viewers don't watch the View. And a lot of the time, it doesn't matter if a lie is eventually rebutted. It's already halfway around the world before the truth gets its shoes on.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by ivand (May 21, 2009 2:57 pm ET)
                2
              That is a load. They never gave him a change to give his side and you never even missed it. I heard his side on his show and guess what? He has proof of his (that Amtrak did hold the seats not the pathetic who came to who first) they have nothing. They are just terrified that people will figure out that they aren't such "normal" women as they pretend to be. They chose to come out swinging and use subterfuge to misdirect. Nicely done propagandists.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (May 21, 2009 4:56 pm ET)
                2  
                He didn't have a defense. He simply had to sit there and take his punishment like any petulant child who has been caught red-handed.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by Whispers (May 21, 2009 2:03 am ET)
        4  
        Huh?

        Is that the best you can do? Go back to 1998 to find a lie?

        How many lies did George W. Bush and Dick Cheney tell in the past eight years? Was it OK for Condi Rice to lie to Congress?

        Why do you think so many members of the Bush administration refused to testify to Congress under oath?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by robyn20094113 (May 21, 2009 4:31 am ET)
           
        It is their show. If they had been on his he would have screamed at them and thrown them out of his studio. Then bragged about it for days. Yeh lets talk about how courtious Glenn Beck is
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ewl94232 (May 20, 2009 6:15 pm ET)
        10
      Let's add one more: How many of you lap up MMFA demanding total accuracy, as in any error is a falsehood, of Conservatives, but they falsely title this piece "... admits he "mischaracteriz[ed]" story" when he only admitted mischaracterizing one small element of the story that he otherwise asserted was true and offered to provide witnesses to confirm?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by david.martin1234339 (May 20, 2009 9:54 pm ET)
        2  
        FACT: Beck imitated Barbara Waters voice, in a very insulting way... as she "summoned" him over to her.

        That was a lie... and an insult to Waters.

        He called it a "mischaracterization"... it was a flat out LIE.

        The "reserved" seats, that was a bald-faced lie too.

        He will say anything to please his knuckle-dragging audience... obviously, he will even LIE.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Whispers (May 21, 2009 2:07 am ET)
        5  
        Huh?

        You appear to be holding MMFA to a completely different standard than you are holding Beck to.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by thejbomb65 (May 22, 2009 12:31 pm ET)
          1  
          your wrong. there is no standard when it comes to beck.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dadre (May 21, 2009 12:37 am ET)
      4  
      I think they were actually being nice to beck compared to how beck and his other fox personalities treat their guest. They didn't cut his mic....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tharri874 (May 21, 2009 12:46 am ET)
      2  
      I notice he quoted Nancy Pelosi using the word "misspoke"

      I can't find anything on the internet about her using that word lately.

      If anyone has that quote, I'd like to read it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by robyn1031 (May 23, 2009 9:01 am ET)
         
      you see, i believe that he is neither hot nor talented. he specializes in the dumbing-down of his listeners by spewing his vitriol and it's now evident (again) that he is a liar.
      but it's not really a surprise that he is a liar and a fraud, now is it?
      Report Abuse