Malkin: "We've lost plenty of liberties," under Obama, "every unalienable right" has been affected
May 20, 2009 5:44 pm ET
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
So a mess that Bush started and inherited by Obama is still a mess. She just admitted it. Obama inherited Bush's assault on liberty. Of course she would be hard pressed to note what other liberties we have lost under the new Administration.
Nice. What a convoluted way to say it but she is right about that.
What she is very wrong on is her first statement: "The Government never has to worry about paying anything back" That is a woefully ignorant statement. Does she not understand what the Full Faith and Credit Clause is in the Constitution?
For all the blustering about the Constitution from wingnuts they prove daily that they have never read it much less understood it.
Section. 1. Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State: And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
mikelartist -
"What she is very wrong on is her first statement: "The Government never has to worry about paying anything back" That is a woefully ignorant statement. Does she not understand what the Full Faith and Credit Clause is in the Constitution?
For all the blustering about the Constitution from wingnuts they prove daily that they have never read it much less understood it."
Okay ... you've got me here. No doubt you know of some subsequent ruling that makes this clause relevant to Michele's statement. Or maybe there is another reference to "Full Faith and Credit" that I've forgotten about. Please explain.
Why does anyone pay anyone back then? The full faith and credit of the UNITED States. We are still United Right? Why do you think the Treasury uses the Full Faith and Credit clause?
Her statement reeked of ignorance. You defend it. The United States does not shirk it's obligations. If it did we would have NO deficit and no debt now would we.
The Full Faith and Credit Clause—Article IV, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution—provides that the various states must recognize legislative acts, public records, and judicial decisions of the other states within the United States. It states that "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State." The statute that implements the clause, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1738, further specifies that "a state's preclusion rules should control matters originally litigated in that state." The Full Faith and Credit Clause ensures that judicial decisions rendered by the courts in one state are recognized and honored in every other state.
Not unalienable.
This woman is truly embarrassing. It's painful to watch.
Yeah, Ms. Manglalang -- like the writ of habeas corpus, the right to be wiretapped only with a warrant that allows it, the right not to be sent away if you disagree with the president . . .
Oh, wait . . .
Name one liberty lost under president Obama that was not already lost by the time he stepped foot into the White House? You crazy bitch!!
Someone needs to tell this misguided, angry, woman about "the hidden costs of what she calls entitlement" such as Healthcare, hmmmm, the USA Today reported that 18,000 people Die everyday from lack of sufficient healthcare...
how dare she, to mock such vital basic health care for children, especially the poor, what a disgrace that anyone would give this lost soul, hater, any forum...so sad...
oh, and the money that businesses will save from not having to subsidize health care any longer, will put Billions back into the economy, not to mention all the money the health care industry losses when forced to give health care to those who can't afford it...where are we as a country when we can't think to join the Public and Private sector for business venture, Rep are incapable of innovative, creative thinkin
...that's why this party is lost in a new time, new ways of doing things, that's why they are so loud and angry, because they can't let go of old ideas, and the public sees right through there fear!!
Thank you MM. I would have never guessed Michelle Malkin was pro-choice.
I bet she thought she killed it, too. A Debate Team reject, if I ever saw one.
"She has a crazy look in her eyes, and is always spouting complete nonsense."
_____________________________________________________________________
IOW, she's no different than Beck, Hannity, Limpballs, Coulter, Boortz, O'Reilly, or any other neoKKKon noisemaker in the known universe . . .
Michelle, quitcherbitchin.