About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Lawyers try to explain to O'Reilly that his "rights" aren't violated by private criticism

May 29, 2009 9:06 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by NdlovukaziThor (May 29, 2009 9:19 pm ET)
      5  
      "Debating"?

      Not that I've ever seen or expected healthy debate on his show, especially when he just shouts his (wrong) opinion over those of his guests and cuts off their mics!

      And there goes another rich-wing white guy comparing his plight to that of African-Americans.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by deeznuts (June 01, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
        5  
        What a buffoon O'Reilly is.

        He doesn't seem to realize that what he thinks libel is does not match the actual legal definition. He thinks his opinion of libel trumps the law.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by deeznuts (June 01, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
          4  
          "I don't care about the law! My rights were violated here!"

          *facepalm*

          "Cut Tanya! Keep quiet!"
          "I don't dish it out, madam! I don't do that!"

          I can't think of enough expletives to throw at this a**hole.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dimes (May 29, 2009 9:24 pm ET)
      19  
      It's OK for O'Reilly to trash people every single day, but he gets all righteously upset when others criticize him?

      Someone call the waahmbulance.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (May 29, 2009 11:30 pm ET)
          23
        Who did he trash last night? You obviously don't know what you are talking about.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dimes (May 30, 2009 12:23 am ET)
          13 1
          Last night? He took a swing at Judge Sotomayor, claiming that her very presence on the Supreme Court could be harmful to the Republican party.

          So, President Obama shrewdly nominated a judge who will most likely be confirmed, and whose presence could very well damage the Republican Party in the process."

          In case you missed it, it was in his Talking Out of His Ass segment.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (May 30, 2009 1:30 am ET)
            1 14
            What a joke, that is what you call demonizing. That is a foolish argument, what he was saying was that Obama was shrewd in his choice because if the Repubs attack her they will look bad and pay a political price. He was actually complimenting Obama's selection and did not take any shots at her. But of course most here love to fictionalize O'Reilly's comments, I can see you are no exception. It is clearly you who is speaking from his ass.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dimes (May 30, 2009 2:59 am ET)
              8 2
              I didn't call it demonizing, you did.

              What Bill O'Reilly and Keith Olbermann do is called trashing.

              'Pinheads.' 'Worst Person In the World.' The shouting, the needling, the sniping.

              It's their schtick. They trash. Viewers know that's what they're going to see when they tune in. That's why they tune in. And who you tune in to comes down to who it is you want to see get trashed.

              But O'Reilly going on the air and moaning about someone doing to him what he makes a good living doing to others puts him squarely in pinhead territory.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by fairliberal (May 30, 2009 9:39 am ET)
                  9
                You are correct, you used the word trash, not demonizing. But he did not do that either, it is just your imagination. Can you quote him where he trashed Judge Sotomayor, or as you said he took a swing at her.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by German Shepard (May 30, 2009 11:07 am ET)
                8  
                dimes, What Billo does is trashing because he doesn't use facts honestly. What Keitho does is call a shill a shill and use the facts to back up his accusations. That's why he can get away with so much criticism of them.

                The recipients of his ire all cringe when Keith gets going. Why? Because they don't have a leg to stand on and they know it. All they can do is whimper and whine about being attacked.

                Don't go equating KO with BO. This is apples and oranges.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by wwittman (May 30, 2009 1:17 pm ET)
                  7  
                  Apples and liars
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by dimes (May 30, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
                  3 1
                  I take your point about accuracy and veracity, but my comment was about the similarities in genre.

                  Both shows feature news commentary and opinion, both are hosted by men who are acerbic and confrontational in style.

                  If you plopped someone who doesn't speak English in front of a TV and made them watch O'Reilly and Olbermann, then asked them what the differences are between the two programs, you'd be hard pressed to hear of many other than the fact that Olbermann is 10 years younger, still has his hair, and is better looking than O'Reilly.

                  Bill has got to be looking over his shoulder right about now, because his reign at the top of the FNC hosty food chain is no longer as assured as it was even a year ago.

                  Hannity's show is very similar in style to O'Reilly, but he's an amateur by comparison - BO has been honing his unihost skills for years, whereas Hannity until recently had to deal with the reasoned counterpoint of Colmes.

                  And this Glenn Beck character who came out of the nowhere of HLN and started getting great numbers from the get-go has got to be giving Bill pause. If Beck can avoid what seems to be an inevitable nervous breakdown or some other psychotic breakdown (a sick day after he was trashed on The View? Please.), he might in time be a real threat to O'Reilly as a goofy counterpoint to BO's overbearing pomposity.

                  But back to the original topic, O'Reilly seems to have a real persecution complex about how he is portrayed in the media. Limbaugh has the same problem, given his plea to MSNBC to stop talking about him (fat chance).

                  If they can't take the heat...
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by MissDee (May 30, 2009 1:23 pm ET)
              5
            it is to laugh, as they say.. the banner headline on the main page here decries conservatives infering that Sotomayor is racist in what she clear says that denegrates another race and gender, yet here they are ready to scream "crybaby" when O'Reilly points out that he's being demonized and caleld racist when he hasnt' made a statement of the same magnitude as that of Sotomayor. Isnt' it wonderful how freedom of speech is only for the liberal and anything said against them is somehow opprssive?

            Hypocrisy .. its what it means to be a liberal.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (May 31, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
              4  
              O'Reilly points out that he's being demonized and caleld racist when he hasnt' made a statement of the same magnitude as that of Sotomayor.

              Bill IS a racist!!!


              During the September 19 edition of his nationally syndicated radio program, discussing his recent trip to have dinner with Rev. Al Sharpton at Sylvia's, a famous restaurant in Harlem, Bill O'Reilly reported that he "had a great time, and all the people up there are tremendously respectful," adding: "I couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference between Sylvia's restaurant and any other restaurant in New York City. I mean, it was exactly the same, even though it's run by blacks, primarily black patronship."

              Later, during a discussion with National Public Radio senior correspondent and Fox News contributor Juan Williams about the effect of rap on culture, O'Reilly asserted: "There wasn't one person in Sylvia's who was screaming, 'M-Fer, I want more iced tea.' You know, I mean, everybody was -- it was like going into an Italian restaurant in an all-white suburb in the sense of people were sitting there, and they were ordering and having fun
              Report Abuse
            • Author by deeznuts (June 01, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
              3  
              infering that Sotomayor is racist in what she clear says that denegrates another race and gender

              I think you need to read those comments again. They don't mean what you think they mean.

              I'll be right here when you're ready to apologize for your lack of reading comprehension.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by jduran4007681 (May 30, 2009 1:15 am ET)
          5  
          maybe you dont actually watch it just a right wing robot follower, i dont watch it but ive tried i just cant stand his bs
          Report Abuse
        • Author by latanza (May 30, 2009 11:27 am ET)
          2 1
          Whoever blogged that statement does know what they are talking about! Bill committed a verbal assault and violated Tanya Tuckers free speech. Free speech does not mean you talk when I say or when you agree with me- It is an assumed courtesy lent to your invited guest without the threat of being "kept quiet" or censored. He asked for a discussion about the issue and when he didn't agree he became verbally assaultive which is a criminal act. Now you were saying, after you look up assault and battery though.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Barry Bonds (May 30, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
            4  
            You make me want to go to law school. What Bill O does HAS to be against the law. It is crazy and irresponsible for these ENTERTAINERS to be confused with legitimate news people. There should be at least a disclaimer at the beginning and ending of every show stating that what you are watching is only entertainment.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (May 30, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
            3  
            "...he became verbally assaultive which is a criminal act."

            No, it's not. I'm no lawyer (though I'm married to one), but it seems to me that both you and Billdo are confusing what you would like the law to be with what it is. His insistence that being called out is being libeled and your claim that he conduct was criminal are both emotional silliness(es).
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mikehuck1976 (May 30, 2009 2:52 pm ET)
              2 1
              Yeah, let's not stoop to Bill's level. I don't care what "attack" people use verbally against me. It is not assault and battery. Or it should not be.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Conchobhar (May 30, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
              1  
              Should read ...hisconduct...
              Lousy proofreading. Sorry.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Barry Bonds (May 31, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
              2  
              I like when people who are "married" to professionals somehow believe that 1) somehow their knowledge transfers to them and 2) there spouse is the singular authority within that profession. With the number of laws and statutes on the books it isn't hard to believe that there is a law which might protect a person when feeling physically threatened by a boisterous angry 6'4" white man. I think the Barney Frank interview was a better example of this.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by latanza (June 01, 2009 9:23 am ET)
              3  
              What type of law does your spouse practice. If she practices criminal law, she knows that what i said is factual. Firstly, assault has to do with what part of battery. Why is is assault and battery? Battery would be enough if it were limited to just physical right? Bill is guilty of the behavior of intimidation and this would be in the assault category if that intimidation is made verbally. I'll debate you on the issue. As a matter of fact, hold on............battery: an assault in which the assailant makes physical contact
              wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn..The combination of two violent crimes: assault (the threat of violence) and battery (physical violence). This legal distinction exists only in jurisdictions that distinguish assault as threatened violence rather than actual violence
              en.wiktionary.org/wiki/assault_and_battery................ and intimidation is what?
              i am not a lawyer, i am a senior at a college- but i rest my case. :)
              Report Abuse
        • Author by kfwils (May 30, 2009 1:00 pm ET)
          3  
          Watch the graphics while the clown speaks. Left wing liberals were refered to as fascists. You here that so often you no longer consider it trashing.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (May 30, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
          4  
          I know you feel you have to defend your fearless leader. But, are you really going to try and argue that a man who has a "pinheads" segment does not trash people?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by stevensm (May 30, 2009 9:37 pm ET)
            4  
            Agree. The pinhead segment was created so he could trash people he has a beef with (while throwing in the occasional true idiot to make the segment look legitimate). Last night he ran down Barbara Streisand for nothing more than she is writing a book on design. If he didn't hate Streisand because of her politics, her book would be of no concern to him and wouldn't have made the pinhead segment at all.

            BillO shouldn't have wagged his finger in the face of the lady lawyer as she was right when she said that BillO should expect this kind of thing being that he dishes it out himself. He calls people on the left loons, he said Soros ought to be hanged and called Gabler a rabid dog who should be fired from his job at FOX. Thursday night he called Gov. Schwarzenneger (sp?) pinhead for his joke about Rush's weight. How hypocritical is that coming from BillO who said Helen Thomas sounds like a witch?

            BillO is just projecting. He does personal attacks too but isn't man enough to be honest and admit it. He's a coward.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by hcaley9669 (May 30, 2009 11:56 pm ET)
              3  
              I really don't think he knows that he's the poster boy for "attack journalism". He's not smart enough to see things from anyone else's perspective. He's right, they're wrong, that's all there is to it; it doesn't have to make a logical sense.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by steelers84 (May 29, 2009 9:26 pm ET)
      9  
      Oh my god, how self-pitying can you be. Yeah, Bill, your speech is so muzzled. I mean, it's not like you have a megaphone that reaches millions of people, while making millions of dollars to do it. Please, muzzle my speech in this way.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (May 29, 2009 9:32 pm ET)
      6  
      I bet Bill would like them and Charlize Theron to give him some fascist discipline for being such a bad boy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by budrykzp9226 (May 30, 2009 3:18 am ET)
        4  
        It's in his personal favorite movie, "Charlize: She-Wolf of the Falafel Brigade".
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Preston (May 29, 2009 9:52 pm ET)
      9  
      Awwww. Poor persecuted, oppressed, yet rich and powerful O'Reilly! Those evil, dishonest libs are taking your rights away of misinforming the public by challenging all your falsehoods! Poor, poor thing. Those lib'urls are out to get you and every other conservative-minded white male, rounding them all up just to take away your freedom! Next thing you know you'll be a slave on some massa's plantation picking cotton like Glenn Beck!

      Poor oppressed O'Reilly!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (May 29, 2009 10:12 pm ET)
        3  
        Good to see you again Preston. I think our parafriendly media has gotten noticeably weirder since I last saw your tag.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Preston (May 29, 2009 10:20 pm ET)
          6  
          What's up, Eweston, good to see that you're still around here, too! Yeah, it's been awhile since I last posted, I have the summer off with some free time on my hands so decided to drop by and see what the ole gang is up to.

          Yes, it has gotten noticeably weirder. I mean, with the election of Obama, wealthy, powerful conservative men like O'Reilly and Beck are so downtrodden nowadays I'm thinking about writing them a reparations check!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (May 29, 2009 11:33 pm ET)
              17
            Now it is the wealthy, powerful liberals who can screw things up. Just in case you were not aware the wealthiest people in our government are dimocrats, liberal dimocrats.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 29, 2009 11:37 pm ET)
              12  
              Prove it, or were you just dropping another stupid bomb?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by fairliberal (May 30, 2009 12:07 am ET)
                  15
                Yup, just another stupid bomb......http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/06/13/senators.finances/
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 30, 2009 1:27 am ET)
                  6  
                  You do realize your six year old link says nothing remotely supporting the point you are trying to make, don't you?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by fairliberal (May 30, 2009 1:41 am ET)
                      9
                    You do realize that I stated that the wealthiest in our government are dimocrats, and a link to financial disclosures most certainly does support it. Of course that is just the senate. ....http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NmE4NWY3Yjc4YmJmMDJmOGU0ZmQwNGE0MjNlMDJiZTY= ....
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 30, 2009 3:11 am ET)
                      7  
                      Now you present another link which doesn't support your statement, this time provided by the extremely partisan and almost always wrong National Review.

                      And this time you have included the "witty" name "Dimocrats." Your previous link was six years old. I am sorry I did not realize at the time that it was older than you are emotionally.
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by fairliberal (May 30, 2009 12:17 am ET)
                  15
                And here is why many of them do not mind higher tax rates.......http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1539821/posts
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Preston (May 30, 2009 12:37 am ET)
                  13  
                  Whoa, wait a second!

                  Did you just cite an article written in 2003 as your source of those "wealthy dimocrats" who are screwing things up currently? The same 2003 where Shrub controlled the White House and the Repiglicans controlled both the House and Senate? The same Repiglicans in 2003 who gave us the current recession we're in now? (And, no, you can't blame this one on Jimmy Carter, Barney Frank and the so-called "radical left" boogie man George Soros, this time. Sowwie!)

                  Then you top it off by citing an article posted at Freeperville?!

                  My, my, my fairliberal, even Stephen Colbert himself couldn't rival that masterful display of self-parody! Bravo! You out-did yourself there, pod'ner!
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by fairliberal (May 30, 2009 1:46 am ET)
                      16
                    You should follow my comments a little closer, I stated that it was now the wealthy dimocrats turn to screw things up and then stated that the wealthiest in our gov't are dims, that is a fact. Kerry , Kennedy, Pelosi just to name a few. Who was in control back then was not even a part of the conversation.

                    And it was dimocratic social engineering that led to out current economic problems along with a number of other issues that both parties must bear the blame for.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Preston (May 30, 2009 2:41 am ET)
                      15  
                      You know what...you're right. I made a complete mistake. I'll be man enough and say this: I'm sorry fauxliberal that I misread your garbag--er, I mean--post! You have to sympathize with me here. (I refrain from using empathize since that word has driven you guys nuts, lately.) I'm often allergic to wingnut, drive-by, freeperesque talking points by trolls, and the moment I read "powerful liberals who can screw things up," my mind immediately made my beautiful brown eyes skip the rest, for my intuition told me what followed would be complete, word-for-word, bullsh**. Thus, I'll concede that I didn't "follow" your comments a little closer. You really got me there!

                      Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn if a politician is wealthy or not; nor do I care who remains the wealthiest among our political elite. The last aristocratic Democrat who was president brought us out the Great Depression and saved your beloved Capitalism from the gutter. A president who remains highly regarded by those who lived through those tough times; someone who is regarded as a working-man's president, despite his patrician upbringing and background. Therefore if Democrats are more wealthy than Repiglicans, yet they deliver Universal Health Care, pull this country out of a recession, rebuilding our poor schools, push and deliver clean energy and green jobs, etc., I doubt the American public will care whether those Democrats are wealthy or not. What they will care about is making sure that Repiglicans aren't holding important positions in our government for a very, very long time! Trust!

                      Finally, I think we can all agree on this: you moaning and whining about "dimocrats" on this site isn't going to change the Repiglicans' permanent minority status as a retrograded, intellectually bankrupt, outdated party whose next stop is next to the Whigs as party no existence. I'm so sowwie. I know that's tough news to bare, but someone has to break it to ya! Toodles!
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (May 30, 2009 3:48 am ET)
                        8  
                        Preston, beautiful, just BEAUTIFUL. You summarized the "Party of NO" perfectly. I am thrilled to see the real GOP exposed for all to marvel and gag at. Unfortunately, some of us seem to think this is news. It has been there for DECADES! Their real success has been in convincing too many citizens that the "L" word is a dirty word and that dissent is Un-American.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Preston (May 31, 2009 12:47 am ET)
                          3  
                          Thanks, Donald! I agree with you, too. I think the one thing I'm enjoying the most is how our gullible, conservative-friendly media is giving the GOP so much rope to hang themselves, that the Obama Administration doesn't have to lift a single finger to respond to such attacks. It's been quite entertaining watching all of their classic slime tactics backfire on them. I'm lovin' it!
                          Report Abuse
                      • Author by fairliberal (May 30, 2009 9:44 am ET)
                          10
                        You should try being consistent, you say you don't care about wealth but you were the one who brought it up.
                        From your post....Yes, it has gotten noticeably weirder. I mean, with the election of Obama, wealthy, powerful conservative men like O'Reilly and Beck are so downtrodden nowadays I'm thinking about writing them a reparations check!
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Preston (May 30, 2009 9:11 pm ET)
                          3  
                          Oh dear. It appears that fauxliberal is one of the slow residential wingnuts we have visiting us at MediaMatters, someone who makes our beloved but otherwise obtuse AnotherAmerican look like the intellectual heir to Edmund Burke and William F. Buckley, Jr.

                          Fauxliberal, I don't think I mentioned anything about wealthy politicians. I singled out wealthy, loudmouth. media hucksters Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck (throw Flush Limpballs in that group, too) because they continue to whine and moan about how victimized and oppressed they are as wealthy, powerful, conservative white men, making bleeding-heart lefties such as myself feel sorry for them! With Beck telling us that Obama is turning many of them into slaves, and O'Reilly having his rights violated by those evil libs, the shining city on the hill has quickly become a hot plantation for Beck and Bill!

                          As a middle-class (barely!) struggling college student, my heart goes out to them...truly! We should've known right from the beginning allowing that IslamoStalinist to win the White House would infringe on their rights to...er...what is it that they're losing again?
                          Report Abuse
                    • Author by solon (May 30, 2009 9:16 am ET)
                      8 1
                      You RepubliSCUM are funny. Not too bright but funny
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by German Shepard (May 30, 2009 11:14 am ET)
                        5  
                        I would disagree with you that they are scum. They just don't rise to the top any more.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by German Shepard (May 30, 2009 11:16 am ET)
                           
                        Besides, calling anyone scum is not the brightest thing you can come up with.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by fairliberal (May 30, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
                            9
                          Yes it is.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Barry Bonds (May 30, 2009 12:55 pm ET)
                            4  
                            Why don't you go to Politico where your skewed views are shared? Do you think you're going to come here and create an alternate understanding for the winning team? You guys lost because you thought Sarah Palin was a "game changer" - and now you're mad at Colin Powell for not going along with the "Hail Mary". There is nothing respectable about your party and ultimately that is what sways votes. When people can respect what you have to offer they will vote for you - white, yellow, rich or poor.
                            Report Abuse
                • Author by mikehuck1976 (May 30, 2009 2:59 pm ET)
                  3  
                  I can refute that completely, "fair" liberal.

                  http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i29139
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (May 30, 2009 9:14 am ET)
              6  
              But the dumbest people in Government are the RepubliSCUM
              Report Abuse
            • Author by latanza (June 01, 2009 9:29 am ET)
              1  
              Then this means they are better at finance matters and discipline. matter of fact, the "dimocrats" are shining very brightly these days.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 29, 2009 11:35 pm ET)
            4  
            Tune in next week for another episode of the Weston and Preston show!

            Good to see you back also, Preston.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Preston (May 30, 2009 12:43 am ET)
              2  
              Thanks for that, Easy-to-refute-wingnuts, I'm glad to see most of the old school posters like yourself and others still here!
              Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (May 31, 2009 11:38 am ET)
            3  
            Been doing some volunteer work in a local JrH. The school year is nearly over and it looks like I might survive the experience. Hope to alternate between that and a HS next year. Going to see if I can scrounge up a summer job in the interm.
            I've produced some new work and have a couple more in the pipeline.
            The co-op gallery I'm with is pushing The 1st Annual Kingston (Wa) Slug Hunt. I've hand painted 16 of the prey, porcelain bananna slugs, the last as a sidewheeler steamboat ferry.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Victor Colorado (May 29, 2009 10:04 pm ET)
      5  
      God bless them for trying to feed Legal Bits to the big baby. Too bad he's only hungry for the Stupid Smacks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TheThief672 (May 29, 2009 10:17 pm ET)
      4  
      Did you notice how Bilbo stated..."your both 2 smart women".
      That was an underhanded insult that didn't give them credit for why they were there....which essentially was 2 smart lawyers who knew the rule of law.
      That was the one FACT that Bilbo needed his audience to discard.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Preston (May 29, 2009 10:24 pm ET)
        11  
        Not to mention that barbaric way of telling Tanya to "keep quiet!" What a belligerent, condescending creep.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by German Shepard (May 30, 2009 11:18 am ET)
          4 1
          Well articulated!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 29, 2009 11:38 pm ET)
          10  
          Now that you recognize that your opinions are stupid, think of what you can do to improve them.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (May 30, 2009 12:08 am ET)
              19
            Well you have outdone the other stupid comment.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 30, 2009 1:33 am ET)
              13  
              In what way? You haven't once posted any evidence that says what you think it says, all the while arrogantly accusing those who can read and form logical arguments of being stupid.

              Perhaps one day, after you cure yourself of the embarrassing illiteracy you exhibit here every day, you will have the standing to judge someone else's mental capabilities. But that day is far in the future.

              Until then, all you can do is stand on the sidelines, grabbing handfuls of the contents of your diaper, and flinging them at your betters.

              At that, you may be better than anyone else on the site. But it certainly isn't anything to be proud of.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (May 30, 2009 9:21 am ET)
              7  
              You really ought to be an expert on stupid what with your vast experience of living your life as YOU. However the very affliction you demonstrate so ably in every post. That you couldnt understand a concept as simple as ICE really gives you no credibility judging the opinion of others. If you KNEW a stupid opinion when you saw one you wouldnt embarass yourself so continually on this site by posting so many of them
              Report Abuse
        • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (May 30, 2009 5:19 am ET)
          10  
          Fairliberal, you've been spanked, now it's 'time out' time!!!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Victor Colorado (May 30, 2009 6:35 pm ET)
            5  
            God bless him. He only managed to give himself a 'thumbs up' for 1 of his posts.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by michaeldgiles4407 (May 29, 2009 10:26 pm ET)
      2  
      Bill can't seem to get the not-so-fine points of the law (or "won't" get them")

      The Constitution prohibits the GOVERNMENT from censoring you. Has that EVER happened to Bill?

      Tort laws (you know, the "frivolous lawsuits" the right is also whining about) protect you from libel and slander (BTW Bill, just so you don't sound like an idiot, if it's in print, it's libel. If it's spoken, it's slander). Libel is not criticizing you, you whiny butt. Even if it's severe criticism. And as a public figure, you have less protection.

      Civil Rights Laws protect certain classes against discrimination (as in your lame example). You can not discriminate in housing or the workplace on the basis of race, religion, gender or age (alas, sexual orientation is not protected). You can say a person is a bigot; you can even BE a bigot. You just can't fire someone because of your bigotry.

      You'd think someone with a college degree could understand these issues. But you'd think someone with an audience (nightly) of 3 million wouldn't whine about being picked on by the Denver Post.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seeryer (May 29, 2009 10:33 pm ET)
      6  
      How come right wingers don't understand that your freedom of speech is only violated if...and here is the kicker....THE GOVERNMENT infringes it. Not MMFA or Think Progress or NewsHounds. O'Reilly is probably the dumbest multi millionaire white guy in America. Maybe we can start a legal defense inhis honor due on his tremendous handicap. How many months until The Bill O'Reilly legal defense fund link shows up on his website? Over-under starts at 6.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by LuvLuLu (May 30, 2009 1:52 am ET)
        7  
        The lawyers tried to explain this to him. I watched it happen this evening - he was really offensive, interrupting them, not allowing them to counter his points, ignoring the fact that they debunked what he said and continuing to say the same debunked stuff over and over again.

        I almost feel sorry for the incompetent SOB. Almost.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by adamsinclair0078312 (May 29, 2009 10:44 pm ET)
      2  
      Bill is making this argument! Bill! Are you kidding me! He labels ANYONE who disagrees with him a far left extremist. He uses the word "pinhead" with abundance! Now when someone calls him out by calling him a bigot (which by definition, he is), all of a sudden his "rights" are violated?

      ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mcnairbo6573 (May 29, 2009 11:05 pm ET)
      7  
      At the end he gets all hot that the one woman is saying O'Reilly can dish it out but can't take it, that he has the bully pulpit and O'Reilly loses it and claims "We don't do that here MADAM! Then when the other lady tries to say something O'Reilly blurts out "Cut Tonyas' mike!! God he's a dumb ass. According to O'Reilly Tonyas' rights were just violated. Oh, I mean the spirit of them.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (May 30, 2009 3:49 am ET)
        3  
        yea i know... what a hypocrite. he says his rights are being violated because someone didnt agree with something he said and they try to shut up him up, and then he does doing the same thing to his own guest. shut your pie hole, billo. try and pick on someone your own size instead of women who cant yell as loud as you. imagine if he invited somebody like jeneanne garafalo... she would lay into him real good.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (May 30, 2009 3:50 am ET)
          5  
          correction: actually, they didnt try and shut him up... he only claims they did.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (May 29, 2009 11:40 pm ET)
      8  
      i hate when he leans forward, raises his voice, points his little finger, and claims that he doesnt "dish it out" with his condescending tone and calling her "madam". and the lady doesnt even stand up to him... she just says "well some people see it that way". i would have punched him square in the mouth.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by budrykzp9226 (May 30, 2009 3:21 am ET)
        4  
        Or at least hung up the phone... oh wait, wrong woman in Billo's life.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Barry Bonds (May 30, 2009 12:59 pm ET)
        2  
        I almost don't blame her for not standing up - it's a recession, she wants to keep cashing those FOX checks. Is biting your tongue worth a little financial stability? In these days and times I think so. I can't imagine her exposing Bill for the idiot she is and then being invited back any time in the near or distant future.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ChiffonBreath (May 29, 2009 11:41 pm ET)
      3  
      LMAO: B.O. thinks he's deserved of the same prestige as a real news person. He doesn't get it that we know he's a slack jawed, mouth breathing, knuckle dragging, ueulating coproficus, baffoon with a big red target on his arse in the Court of the RightWing News Mashing.

      He's an entertainer and the people ain't buying his shtick any more, and not a moment too soon!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by alchron (May 29, 2009 11:58 pm ET)
      3  
      Libel? Wouldn't that be Slander? I wish someone would have a sign below Bilbo that lights up when he makes a racist/sexist/any-ist remark.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by phredicles (May 30, 2009 12:17 am ET)
      5  
      I saw the headline and thought, Man, talk about a Sisyphean task: "But we're talking about people criticizing MY speech!"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by davidlev (May 30, 2009 12:38 am ET)
      4  
      Correct me if I'm wrong....but didn't O'Reilly, by his own metric, impede Tanya's right to free speech when he told her to "shut up?" And poor Tanya, by the way, she barely was able to speak at all. I think that might be my least favorite thing about Fox News presenters: how they talk over their guests and shout at them when their guests try to give more than a three word answer.

      And as for Carrie Prejean, whom he mentioned at one point in this section, pardon me for going off on a tangent, because her claim of having her free speech attack really bugs me. Perez Hilton asks her a question (which he is in fact SUPPOSED to do, as it is part of his JOB), she answers the question, and he doesn't like the answer, which, if you actually watched his infamous video, you'll see is because he honestly thought it was a bad answer, so he grades her down, which is also part of his job. And she comes in second, boo hoo on her. In no way was her free speech infringed upon, unless you want to argue that she has a right to free speech and Perez doesn't. Again, when she goes onto TV interview shows and signs up to do ads for NOM, she can't go all waaah waah because other people don't like what she says, unless again you want to argue that she has a right to free speech and they don't.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Shorebird (May 30, 2009 12:51 am ET)
      3  
      How many times has O'Reilly called people "pinheads" on this show and all of a sudden his rights are abused by someone calling him an "idiot?"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by underweller (May 30, 2009 3:26 am ET)
      3  
      Hey, fairliberal. I really don't care what your political leanings are(they hardly seem liberal or fair)and maybe your just having a bad day... With that username and "WEpublican" slant you frankly have no credibility. It's the same as El Rushie using the term Democrat Party. Keep up the good work because fair minded people who may truley be on political fence are beginning to see through the games. So if you are right-leaning be right-leaning but don't insult yourself with a tag like fairliberal... Please!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (May 30, 2009 3:37 am ET)
      5  
      I am watching this video right now. My GOD, Bully O is such a self-important gas bag. He invites guests on who are experts in their fields and he will NOT allow them to TALK. He uses his guests ONLY to frame his one-sided rants. Guests are merely his "straight men", or, in this case, straight women.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (May 30, 2009 4:39 am ET)
      6  
      Debate? What debate? That was two lawyers telling BillO the reality of the Constitution and the laws of the land... and BillY had a preconception in his mind that is wrong and fell apart because of it yet again!

      What a putz!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by williamsn517 (May 30, 2009 4:53 am ET)
      4  
      "I don't care about the law."

      Thanks for pointing out the obvious, bill-o.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bob Roberts (May 30, 2009 4:59 am ET)
      5  
      "WE DONT DO THAT HERE MADAM"

      What we do is send my monkey-boy for a producer, Jesse Waters, to follow a blogger on a 2 1/2 hr drive, wait outside the hotel she was spending the weekend in, wait for her to come out, chase her down a street, throw a microphone in her face and demand an apology for me, Mr. I Am Being Libelled.

      But I don't attack anyone ladies, no siree Bob.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by only_myschly3567 (May 30, 2009 6:33 am ET)
      2  
      If you look up "self-awareness", you get a picture of Bill O'Reilly.


      This man really just can't see the world through anyone's eyes but his own...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (May 31, 2009 10:21 pm ET)
        2  
        In reference to O'Lielly, I think you meant "self-absorption."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by miakulper (May 30, 2009 7:02 am ET)
      3  
      Talk about projection! O'Reilly himself often slanders Media Matters on his show.

      Apparently, if you go around quoting O'Reilly in full context, that makes you "smear merchants," "scum" and "assassins."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by janiewoo2933 (May 30, 2009 7:42 am ET)
      3  
      Bill-O is an idiot who will not let others get their pointw acrosse.I don't know how he gets ANY guests when he treats them like this.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dlundblad4154 (May 30, 2009 9:05 am ET)
      4  
      As always, the most interesting part of this is that Billo actually believes he is right; he seems to believe that if someone is ugly to him, his rights have been violated. I do wonder why, if he isn't interested in what the law actually says, he invited lawyers on the show to discuss the matter.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (May 30, 2009 9:25 am ET)
      6  
      Let's remember this the next time he sends out his Stalker Producers to harass people.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Pixelwhore (May 30, 2009 11:00 am ET)
      3  
      Billo tells Tanya to keep quiet in a very misogynistic fashion, check video time 00:35.

      Ridiculous!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by latanza (May 30, 2009 11:24 am ET)
      3  
      When Bill told Tanya to be quiet or directed his staff to tell her to be quiet I liked to died! How is this man tolerated? What are you gonna do about it. I would start a discussion on Bill and his antics as well his role in condescendind media. Bill has a special place in media that seems abusive and almost violent and assault is verbal influence that threatens or intimidates, battery is the physical part of it. Any lawyers in MMFA who would like to take this on?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kromecom48 (May 30, 2009 11:36 am ET)
      10  
      What a fool. He could not win a high school debate competition with nonsense like this. I watched increduously as he attacked his own guests -- not because they were rude -- but because they told him the legal ridiculousness of his position, and of course because they were in his estimation "liberals."

      The GOP and conservative movement have imploded because of this type of stupidity. Many Americans may be lemmings, but they're not necessarily stupid lemmings (with the exception of O'Reilly, Hannity, Beck and Limbaugh syncophants).
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (May 30, 2009 9:10 pm ET)
        4  
        So true so very true
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Preston (May 31, 2009 12:41 am ET)
          3  
          Oh my God, I'm just now noticing Solon posting here! Good to see you, man! I remember the last time I posted here (which was many, many months ago) you went totally A-Wall! Glad to see you here again. No one gives the wingnuts a good thrashing here at MediaMatters like you!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by sdlnkicker4551 (May 30, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
      3  
      Talk about a big baby! He sounds like a kid whining. And as he whines, he blames everybody but himself. "They"re picking on me, Mom". What a smuck.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by chihweenie (May 30, 2009 12:34 pm ET)
      5  
      I thought the most telling part of the whole thing is when he did not want to recognize a difference between entertainment media and news media. Since he belongs to the former and pretends to be the latter. The thing that gets me, not just will BillO but with all the Fox screamers, is the innate hypocrisy. Sean Hannity pushing the John Rich song "Shutting Detroit Down" is hilarious, since Hannnity (as are all right wing-nuts) is anti-union. Autoworkers in Detroit are union workers. If you want to have a song about "real" non-union autoworkers losing their jobs, it would have to be "Shutting Olive Branch, MS" down. But that would never happen, since they would then have to care about a Japanese car maker closing a plant. Not exactly the territory of the "Great American". It is all stupid and inflammatory and intended to rile up people who are not interested enough to go out and learn something for themselves. Wanna know why the majority of college-educated people in this country are Democrats/Liberals? Because learning to think for yourself is a dangerous thing.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cdwriteme (May 30, 2009 1:26 pm ET)
      3  
      Is that really Bill "Cut his microphone" O'Reilly duscussing appropriate discourse?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cdwriteme (May 30, 2009 1:41 pm ET)
      3  
      Woah. I can't believe how sexist and aggressive he got towards the end towards both of them. But, the real mind-blower for me was the way he shushed the African-American Acker towards the end. That seriously looked like something out of the 1950's.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seroquel (May 30, 2009 4:37 pm ET)
      4  
      A rich, white, conservative man...who does the very same thing he's decrying.
      If you dish it out, you HAVE to take it.
      He's been libeled? By who?
      I haven't read any lies about him anywhere.
      I have heard his whiny, self-centered rants once too many times, over-talking and yelling at his "guests" when they intelligently correct him.
      Debate? That was the most one-sided debate I ever heard, condescendingly referring to the "two intelligent women" like that was the first time women have been intelligent.
      When is Fox going off the air? These falsehoods and half-baked innuendo's are going WAY too far.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Daniel Barber (May 30, 2009 5:26 pm ET)
      4  
      Bill O'Lielly constantly trashes people with lies and half-truths and has the audacity and gall to try and act like his "Rights" were violated because people call him a bigot?

      HAHAHAHAHAHA

      I can't tell you how absolutely hilarious.

      Oh, and O'Lielly, there was some of that on the right in regard to boycotts? Yeah, from you, you moron. As in, let's boycott France, remember you troglodyte...lol
      Report Abuse
    • Author by paul8616 (May 30, 2009 10:42 pm ET)
      5  
      Bullies never react well to being called out. In fact, one might say that O'Reilly's reaction to being told he 'dishes it out' is pretty much the definition of bullying behavior.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Alocklsee (May 31, 2009 2:31 am ET)
      4  
      O'Reilly is demonstrating his ignorance and stupidity over and over. Here he is advised by 2 attorneys and still can't break the mind controlled conditioning his religious affiliation holds over him.

      The way to break the brainwashing and mental conditioning of the people afflicted is to find the forum, blogs, websites they congregate on and post, post, post and continue telling them the true facts and not let up as this along with other media outlets will all work in unison to break the hold on the people.

      Until the Fascist-Fundamentalist/Evil Evangelicals are exposed to the rank and file attendees at the weekly/daily conditioning meetings they will not be able to think for themselves and will only continue to parrot the party line, no matter how ridiculous and mindless it sounds for as soon as one of thsoe slip another pops up to use the buzz words to return them into the mindless existence they all live under.

      Remember the God-Squad will not give up their Fascist takeover plans and it will require that they be shown and given tit for tat what they spew out and returned 10 fold with factual proof and doses of reality to counteract their fantasy worlds and to help them break free from the mind control they are living in.

      TFR
      Alockslee
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Ribelin2000 (May 31, 2009 8:04 am ET)
      5  
      What a hypocrite! I remember a few years ago when the Dixie Chicks were being attacked for saying that they were ashamed that President Bush was from Texas. O'Reilly was one of those participating in the witch-hunt, accusing the Chicks of hating America. The argument the conservatives made then was that the First Amendment protects freedom of speech from government infringement, not from private citizens participating in boycotts. The right-wing talking heads now seem to have forgotten that. Go figure.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by todzebub (May 31, 2009 10:05 am ET)
      6  
      Hard to watch, disagree w/ BO and it's nonstop interruptive fillibuster, no different than cutting the mic.

      Report Abuse