About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

O'Reilly 2006 anti-Tiller rant: "[I]f I could get my hands on Tiller -- well, you know. Can't be vigilantes. Can't do that. It's just a figure of speech."

June 01, 2009 4:22 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

From the November 6, 2006, broadcast of Westwood One's The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly:

O'REILLY: This is a human rights issue. Can you imagine impregnating a 10-year-old, 11-year-old, 12-year-old, and the abortion clinic doesn't turn the information over to the authorities? Can you imagine? Because there's nothing gonna happen to the, you know, girl. She's gonna be interviewed. And if she's living in a home with a father --

E.D. HILL (co-host): Right.

O'REILLY: -- or an uncle who would do that, you're gonna keep her in that home?

HILL: Well, and the woman said most of the times, these are repeat offenders. Well, OK --

O'REILLY: Yeah.

HILL: -- even more of a reason that you need to --

O'REILLY: But that's OK with her because it's all theory. It's all theory with her. You see? It doesn't matter. And I'll tell you what: Even if you walked her through it, if you made her stay in the room while Tiller took the baby out and drilled a hole in its head, she wouldn't change. Wouldn't change. Would retreat back into the world of theory, reproductive rights, [unintelligible] funding, eh duh deh, buh boo buh bah buh bah. And that's where we are in America. Not everybody is like that. Most people believe the way I believe. I know that. All the polls show that. But the powers that be, the courts, the media -- oh, the media. I can't tell you how despicable I think The Kansas City Star and The Wichita Eagle -- those are the two main ones. I can't tell you.

Let me just read you one thing before we take a break. I'm gonna take your phone calls. This is from the Associated Press. This is Associated -- no, this Kansas City Star, Kansas City Star. Quote: "O'Reilly said on the program that a source told his show that abortion providers were performing late-term abortions because the women were depressed, a mental health risk he deemed insufficient."

"He deemed insuff"-- this is David Klepper, Kansas City Star. You see? "O'Reilly deemed it. Who's O'Reilly?" "He deemed."

OK. So, I'm the fascist, I'm the bad guy, I'm the problem. Not Tiller. No, he -- no, no, no. He's a good guy. Now, Tiller's pumping all kinds of money into obviously the attorney general race. He wants the guy that's gonna let him off the hook to win. Those of you listening in Kansas, you ought to know that. You know, I don't -- I'm not gonna tell you who to vote for. You guys know these guys better than I do, but I tell you what, anything Tiller wants, I'm voting the other way. And if I could get my hands on Tiller -- well, you know. Can't be vigilantes. Can't do that. It's just a figure of speech.

But despicable? Oh, my God. Oh, it doesn't get worse. Does it get worse? No. Back with your calls and comments.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by hcaley9669 (June 01, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
        2
      Bill O'Reilly is not entirely responsible for the murder of Dr. Tiller.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (June 01, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
        5  
        It won't. The media will defend him from all the "unfair attacks."

        But the truth is, BOR publicized the guy and incited an immense amount of hatred towards him. If that's not shared culpability, then there is no such thing.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (June 01, 2009 10:47 pm ET)
          2  
          Indeed. I wonder how many people would have been protesting outside of his office if Bill hadn't called more attention to this doctor? Probably not nearly as many at all. Or, possibly none.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dimes (June 01, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
      2  
      Strike that - my mistake. I just noticed the '2006' attached to this O'Reilly rant.

      However, my comment about the public condemnation of O'Reilly's role in the doctor's assassination stands. And I'm talking 2009.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (June 01, 2009 5:17 pm ET)
      4  
      Get ready tonight for Billo to attack the extreme left wing media for even suggesting that he might have encouraged the killing of Dr. Tiller. In Billo's world, Billo NEVER does anything wrong. Can't wait to see Billo get his panties all twisted up over this one.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Victor Colorado (June 01, 2009 5:22 pm ET)
        5  
        Maybe he'll read and answer my email...

        From: [Victor Colorado]
        Sent: Mon 6/01/09 11:44 AM
        To: oreilly@foxnews.com

        Dear Bill O'Reilly:

        Now that the man you dubbed "Tiller the baby killer" has been murdered in church, have you any regrets about your campaign against George Tiller and your repeated portrayal of the doctor as a murderer on the loose?

        Sincerely,
        Report Abuse
        • Author by carlileb5935 (June 01, 2009 5:40 pm ET)
          5  
          Add,

          "Do you think that your strong language against the doctor might have inspired this kind of hatred and retribution?"
          Report Abuse
        • Author by WildcatProgressive (June 01, 2009 8:21 pm ET)
          3  
          What's especially impressive about Billo is that it took about 30 seconds of his show before he made the Tiller murder all about him. Listening to Bill, the only reason the IRA came into being is to make him (he's Irish, after all) look bad.

          And I'm not surprised Juan Williams is taking time to talk about what a great, misunderstood man Loofah Bill is. "You've never incited violence, you've never told people to blockade a clinic." I am surprised he found time between getting Bill's drycleaning and holding the camera for Jesse Watters to actually appear on screen, however.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Victor Colorado (June 01, 2009 5:17 pm ET)
      2  
      I wonder which abortion provider Bill O'Reilly will target next.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by goshzilla (June 01, 2009 5:26 pm ET)
      3  
      O'Reilly said Tiller was performing abortions for trivial reasons like headaches. So now O'Lielly is going to suggest Tiller was complicit in covering up cases of rape or incest?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (June 01, 2009 5:42 pm ET)
      3  
      If you could get your hands on Tiller?

      Or if you could get your hands on bin Laden?

      Bill's the go to guy if you need someone who "wants' to get his hands on someone.

      Yet he had the chance to get his hands on some VC and NVA but had other priorities.

      He does talk a good game though.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by harley (June 01, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
      6 2

      O'Racist and the inbred hicks at Fox have even MORE blood on their hands. You teabagging terrorists (looking at you faillibrul) that worship this loser are pathetic and your apologies for O'Racist are embarrassing. You are terrorists....this is a fact.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (June 01, 2009 5:56 pm ET)
        8  
        Absolutely Harley!

        The guy who killed Dr. Tiller is a terrorist and anyone who provides cover or excuses or explains the reasoning for the terrorist act is the same as those who cover for Islamic terrorists.

        After all, you're either with us or against us. And O'Reilly and his ilk have chosen their side.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by LuvLuLu (June 01, 2009 10:53 pm ET)
          2  
          Sarah Palin was unwilling to describe him as a terrorist, but boy was she anxious to repeatedly describe Bill Ayers as a terrorist.

          Funny thing, though, Bill Ayers hasn't done anything that one could classify as terrorism in a couple of generations. The guy that shot Dr Tiller in a church while Tiller was an usher is clearly a terrorist, but she can't bring herself to call him one. Since when is it okay to take the law into your own hands and murder someone for providing a lawful medical procedure, Sarah? How is that NOT terrorism?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by hoosier (June 01, 2009 6:36 pm ET)
          9
        So predictable for Dr. Matt. His favorite subject, bashing Bill O'Reilly at every opportunity.

        This one has sent him into ecstasy.

        Nothing could possibly making him happier. He can't even pretend to be outraged he's so happy. Like Harvey Korman trying to hold back from laughing in a Carol Burnette skit.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 01, 2009 7:09 pm ET)
          5  
          Who's "Dr Matt?" I just rescanned the page and don't see a reference to a "Dr Matt." Is he one of the voices in your head? Do you think this imaginary voice has emotions and is happy? Do you have an appointment with a mental health professional?

          Inquiring minds want to know.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (June 01, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
          4  
          Harvey Korman?

          Do you have any references to living people?

          Are you trying to be some low rent version of Dennis Miller with your senior citizen references?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by WildcatProgressive (June 01, 2009 8:23 pm ET)
            4  
            Must be a really low-rent version, since he can't even spell Carol Burnett correctly.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (June 01, 2009 9:50 pm ET)
          4  
          So predictable. An inane snivel by a conservative. Who could have possibly seen THAT coming?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (June 01, 2009 10:11 pm ET)
          4  

          So predictable for Hoosier, attack the messenger and defend her favorite subject, Bill O'Reilly, at every opportunity. Nothing could possibly make her happier. She can't even pretend to be outraged over O'Racist's blood on his hands, instead, you attempt to attack posters. How typical of you teabagging terrorist scumbags. Keep obsessing over me and ignoring your defense of terrorists and terrorism. You disgust me.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by LuvLuLu (June 01, 2009 10:55 pm ET)
          2  
          There's a poster or two (or one sockpuppet with multiple names) who claims that Harley is Dr Matt on another blog - like it's a sin to have multiple screen names on different sites, and like it's okay to attack the messenger instead of attacking the message.

          Reminds me of the creeps who used to attack me rather than attacking what I said - creeps who seem to have folded up their tents since the new format has been in existence, so maybe MMfA got wise to their multiple sockpuppets!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 01, 2009 9:49 pm ET)
        5  
        You and I, harley, have had our differences. We disagree on alot of liberal / conservative policies, thoughts, and lines of attack between the two. The truth is "fair"-liberal and I probably agree on more things politically than you and I. However, you are absolutely correct when it comes to O'Reilly and his attacks on "Tiller the baby killer" and claiming this man is killing babies because the mother had a headache.

        He purposely misconstrued the laws in Kansas and did not give a full accounting because it interferred with his narrative. O'Reilly is what has become of the Republican party. He is shameless and cowardly. He also plays the bravado, macho anti-terrorist until it comes to homegrown terrorists in our own country. Them - he incites.

        And he incites them for the lowest common demoninator - the worst of all possible reasons. He does it for the same reason that "fair"-liberal and other sycophants constantly defend him...for the ratings and for the money.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (June 01, 2009 10:50 pm ET)
          3  
          And, the scary thing is. O'Reilly is NOT the worst.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 01, 2009 11:19 pm ET)
            3  
            You're right. He is not even close. He is now mainstream in the Republican party. This is what has become of the right. Inciting domestic terrorism against law-abiding American citizens while advocating "tough-guy" torture tactics against people who have had nothing proven against them. O'Reilly and his ilk who post here in his support are what we used to call "pop-tarts" in the neighborhood where I grew up. No matter how hot they get, they're still soft in the middle.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (June 01, 2009 10:51 pm ET)
      3  
      i hate when he answers his own questions... no wonder hes always yelling over people who disagree with him. usually if he asks them something, hes yelling over them before they get 2 words in because he wants to hear them agree with his ridiculous rationale.
      Report Abuse