Despite noting contrary evidence, Cavuto persists in promoting conspiracy theory linking dealership closings to political donations
June 02, 2009 1:54 pm ET


Media Matters: The right-wing media's election analysis just ain't that good
The Friday Rush: For conservatives, $400 million buys defeat at the ballot box
The myth of Fox News' ratings spike|
|
||
![]() |
||
By the way, it's interesting to note that, by the stats that FOX put on the screen, the ratio of Democratic donors to Republican donors in the Dealership population at large mirrors almost exactly the ratio in closed dealerships. Even so, there MUST be a conspiracy!
Idiots.
; )
"Republican donors were incrementally less, rather than more likely likely to have their dealerships shuttered, according to Singer's analysis, although the pattern is nowhere in the ballpark of being "statistically significant" as most of us would define it."
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/
Yet they talk about for almost 4 minutes on Fox Noise.
God my head hurts!
I am not dogging that idea. I find it sort of admirable in a way. I think that could help explain this guy's views a bit, though.
If you listen to the car salesman, he is all over the place. Throwing in the caveat "if this is true" and "I can't believe the government would do that" and in the next breath suggesting it is true despite zero evidence to support it. He came off looking like a real nutjob IMO.
"I find it very hard to believe."
"if that is true..."
The funny thing is that if they actually took his idea of assigning someone to investigate and present why each dealership gets cut, and he doesn't like the results, he'll just start saying that the person presenting the findings is in on the conspiracy.
Now if we only had a single bit of evidence to support the theory...
This is of course akin to saying that if it is true that Rush Limbaugh really eats puppies for breakfast, it should not be tolerated.
Every 4-5 years
Teen friendly
Class and affordability
Yes, I will take the job. you can reach me here at MMFA.
Problem Solved! and recycle all of them other ratchets.
Closing dealerships was Chrysler's idea. Obama and Chrysler both say that Chrysler was the one who chose which dealers should be shut or open, not Obama or the task force.
I've been pestering the blogs promoting the conspiracy theory and they haven't come up with one piece of credible evidence that Obama or the task force made the picks. Amazing how kook conspiracy theories morph and live on.
How could Obama or his task force have picked dealerships to close unfairly when they didn't even pick at all?
TALK ABOUT LEVERAGE! LET'S GO!
Chrysler is a good, but new establishment. Chrysler seems to be an accountable and responsible country. They have acted preventitively and not after the depression has set in. You could learn a few things from them.
GM, what about that job request?
Anyway, Chrysler knows a good idea when they read it and they are probably on it. You guys move to slow because you are over confident or you are waiting on a miracle from the Republicans-this will not happen.
I love the fact that GM has done so much and they DESERVED THE BAILOUT! Chrysler is going to do just fine, I think.
The President received political donations from southerners too but he ain't bailing out garden homes and tea parties! He is putting down strategy that will enable America to go forward without acting out of hatred and unjust practices. I don't even think that torture is really the issue with waterboarding, it is the attitude, the sadism, and the barbarianism to another race in the shaddow of our own error and the mf nerve of us to act as though it's then justified.
Let's Go!