Limbaugh: If Sotomayor is "a pro-life racist, I may have to change my view"
June 03, 2009 2:36 pm ET
Expand All
Expand 1st Level
Collapse All
-
-
by VirginiaTagz
(June 03, 2009 2:46 pm ET)
Who is he arguing with?Reply Report Abuse-
by canaanxing9025
(June 03, 2009 7:52 pm ET)
We all know what he is saying: "If I am wrong about Sotomayor, (that she is pro-life),I will eat my shorts."Reply Report Abuse
-
-
by NiceguyEddie
(June 03, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
2Well sure - then she'd be just like Roberts, Alito and Scalia!Reply Report Abuse -
by Easy to refute wingnuts
(June 03, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
3Rush, in order for you to change you view on anything, you would first have to remove your head from your ass.Reply Report Abuse-
by DAWUSS
(June 03, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
2Can he even bend that far?Reply Report Abuse-
by NiceguyEddie
(June 03, 2009 3:17 pm ET)
2With that fat ass? I couldn;t even bend that far!Reply Report Abuse
-
by snoopy
(June 03, 2009 3:38 pm ET)
2He's probably got enough ass that he could bring it to his head.Reply Report Abuse
-
-
-
-
by peace4all
(June 03, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
so rush takes another great pricipled stand and decrys the racism of a supreme court nominee. then decides that maybe being a rasist isn't so bad if said racist is pro-life. this is the way a true wingnut backpeddles from accusing sotomayor of being racist by taking her out of context and getting called on it. he can't admit that he was wrong so change the subject. while i will agree that rush is extreamly right 99% of the time it's too bad he is only correct the other 1% of the timeReply Report Abuse
-
The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
