About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Napolitano on Sotomayor questionnaire: "What we'll learn is ... is she responsible with her own money?"

June 04, 2009 5:25 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Rosen, Napolitano cite anonymous law clerks criticizing Sotomayor

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by MikeW (June 04, 2009 5:54 pm ET)
         
      So to me it looks like FOX doesn't know the difference between a million and a billion.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jonwisby (June 04, 2009 5:54 pm ET)
         
      The chyron guy might do some research into how many 0's in a million.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lorryl (June 04, 2009 7:26 pm ET)
         
      Why does the message board read $1,000,000,000 (too many zeroes)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (June 04, 2009 8:33 pm ET)
         
      NOTE:
      Orally: from 0:11 to 0:32 over a million dollars, 1.16 Million

      Text: SOTOMAYOR'S PERSONAL ASSETS TOP $1,000,000,000 (one billion dollars)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fairliberal (June 04, 2009 9:44 pm ET)
      2 3
      Is this conservative mis-information?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (June 04, 2009 11:04 pm ET)
           
        It is another distraction meme. We'll see if this irrelevent question gets picked up as a somehow important question by the "cowboys of the apocalypse" and repeated.
        Bets on who gave you the thumbs up.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fairliberal (June 04, 2009 11:17 pm ET)
            3
          I don't think it is irrelevant for a lawyer and former judge to comment on what the process of examination is for a Supreme Court nominee. As it was pointed out , it applies to both sides.

          And I would love to know who gave me the thumbs up too, I'll take a wild guess and predict it was not you.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by eweston8542983 (June 05, 2009 12:21 am ET)
               
            So your worried about the personal financial responsibility of someone who per the srceen shot above is within spitting distence $1,000,000,000 in assets. Somehow dispite this and the struggle her mother went though to support her family. She's to be cloaely examined on the issue. Fair enough, as if there won't be hyperventilating and screeching sufficient to keep the wolves awake. Fridays up and the weekend talk shows are nie. We'll see if this plays out the usual machine way pretty shortly.

            Your wild guess puts you at one out of howmany? You have a new compatriot. Or an old troll in a new name on site.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by fairliberal (June 05, 2009 2:00 am ET)
                2
              Did I say I was worried about anything, you are putting words in my mouth. As it was pointed out that is the process that any nominee would go through. Didn't the dems do the same to Bush's nominees? That is what the opposition party is supposed to do , is it not?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by eweston8542983 (June 05, 2009 10:20 am ET)
                1  
                Three posts on the subject is just a passing fancy, ten four Elinore.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (June 05, 2009 10:33 pm ET)
           
        Is this conservative mis-information? -fairliberal


        What, saying someone's personal assets top $1 BILLION when they don't?

        Simple answer: YES.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fairliberal (June 06, 2009 10:36 pm ET)
             
          Who did you hear say that her personal assets top $1 billion?

          Are you as critical of MMFA when they screw up their graphics...http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906050033 or here....http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906050034.... funny how they are posting on 6/5 something they claim didn't happen until 6/6
          Report Abuse
    • Author by puppienrainbows (June 04, 2009 10:31 pm ET)
         
      Public record!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by caveman (June 04, 2009 10:44 pm ET)
         
      There's nothing wrong with this clip. It was a surprisingly objective (for Faux News) review of what the process is and the purpose of these documents. Media Matters, you're great: but find better stuff than this!
      Report Abuse