Buchanan again says Sotomayor believes "discrimination against white males is OK"

Once again....why does MSNBC even have this irrelevant commentator on?

All Buchannon needs to do now is end his racist rant with "and now for a few words from my corporate sponsors". Look what Raw Story just uncovered!

The Committee for Justice (CFJ), an astroturf group established by big business in July 2002 to create an appearance of popular support for President Bush’s judicial nominees, is now leading the effort to oppose the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the US Supreme Court.

CFJ’s Executive Director Curt Levey has been sending out press releases and making media appearances to promote the theme that Sotomayor is racist and biased in her rulings, drawing his talking points largely from a speech in which she suggested that when it came to race and sex discrimination cases, it was possible that “a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences … would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

“It’s pretty disturbing,” Levey told The Hill. “It’s one thing to say that occasionally a judge will despite his or her best efforts to be impartial … allow occasional biases to cloud impartiality. But it’s almost like she’s proud that her biases and personal experiences will cloud her impartiality.”

CFJ was created at the urging of former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MO) – who has himself been plagued by allegations of racism. In 2002, as Senate Democrats stalled the nomination of Judge Charles Pickering to the Federal Court of Appeals over Pickering’s alleged racial insensitivity and opposition to abortion, Lott recruited C. Boyden Gray to create a fake grassroots organization to drum up support for Pickering’s confirmation.

There ya have it folks!

It's bizarre to hear statements like Buchanan's, but this is a good demonstration of how the conservative echo chamber works in our media.They've spent weeks dumbing down Sotomayor's career to an inaccurate sound bite or two.

Buchanan has been hearing himself, and his co-horts, progressively distorting the subject, to the point where he can just blurt out the stupidity above, and he may have even convinced himself that it's fact by now.

Let's put a little context to that, nerz!

^^ Exactly. It's amazing that not a single media person at MSNBC used this example against Uncle Pat whenever he goes on his tirades about Sotomayor's discrimination against white males. Why would she rule in favor of a racist white guy, defending his rights of "political expression," if she hates white males so much? I think this was one of the many examples that made Newtize dial it back some lately. If she's a judge out the punish white men why didn't she do it in this case?

It's quite pitiful that Tweety hasn't brought this up to Uncle Pat whenever the latter is on OddBall whining and moaning about "reverse-racism" and "discrimination against white males".