About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

At least 22 TV appearances for Liz Cheney -- in less than a month

June 05, 2009 2:52 pm ET

In recent days, several commentators and journalists have highlighted Liz Cheney's frequent -- and often misinformation-filled -- national television interviews. Media Matters has updated our list of Liz Cheney's recent TV appearances, and we've found that just since May 12, she's had at least 22:

• On the June 4 edition of CNN's The Situation Room (5 p.m. hour)

• On the June 4 edition of Fox News' Your World

• On the June 4 edition of MSNBC Live (1 p.m. hour)

• On the June 4 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe (7 a.m. hour)

• On the June 2 edition of Fox News' On the Record (Part II of Greta Van Susteren's interview with Dick and Liz Cheney)

• On the June 1 edition of Fox News' On the Record (Part I of Greta Van Susteren's interview with Dick and Liz Cheney)

• On the June 1 edition of CNN's Campbell Brown: No Bias, No Bull

• On the May 28 edition of MSNBC Live (2 p.m. hour)

• On the May 27 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends

• On the May 26 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk

• On the May 22 edition of ABC's Good Morning America

• On the May 22 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe

• On the May 22 edition of CNN's American Morning

• On the May 21 edition of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360

• On the May 21 edition of Fox News' Hannity

• On the May 21 edition of MSNBC Live

• On the May 20 edition of Fox News' Your World

• On the May 17 edition of ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos

• On the May 16 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends Saturday

• On the May 15 edition of Fox News' On the Record

• On the May 12 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk

• On the May 12 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe

Thanks to Chrissy Schwen, Zachary Pleat, and Hannah Kieschnick for assembling this list.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by far_left_loon (June 05, 2009 3:04 pm ET)
        6
      God Bless Liz Cheney!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by TonySpadarella (June 06, 2009 11:02 am ET)
        2  
        Why? For prevarication? For promoting human rights abuses? For justifying torture? Some "god" you all believe in!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (June 06, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
        1  
        far left, i dont think so i'd say GOD d--- LIZ CHENEY
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Max Credits (June 05, 2009 3:15 pm ET)
      7 1
      22 TV appearances in less than 30 days results in 0 (zero) direct answers to a single question. No wonder she's out of work.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kfraz43 (June 05, 2009 3:33 pm ET)
        8 1
        My new TV watching rule is this: hearing the words "Up next, Liz Cheney" = changing of channel.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (June 05, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
          8
        Your right, it is a shame MMFA can not tell the networks who to interview.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (June 06, 2009 11:32 am ET)
          3  
          Your right, it is a shame MMFA can not tell the networks who to interview.


          Are you hearing voices again? Who ever said or implied such a notion?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (June 05, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
        6 1
        Oh come on. She said " My daddy protected us from the terrorists", honest.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pointofview (June 05, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
            12
          Well, at least what she said was correct.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Whispers (June 05, 2009 4:28 pm ET)
            9  
            Well, aside from the only major terrorist attack on US soil, ever, sure, it's "correct" to say that Cheney protected the US from terrorists.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pointofview (June 05, 2009 4:31 pm ET)
                8
              By a terrorist Clinton let go.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Max Credits (June 05, 2009 4:38 pm ET)
                3 1
                Which made W very happy. He said he wanted to wage war on Iraq in 1999. That's why he helped let 9/11 happen, so he and Cheney could muster the political justification for a preemptive attack.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by LuvLuLu (June 05, 2009 7:10 pm ET)
                5  
                Clinton didn't let a terrorist go. He never had Osama bin Laden. He never had had legal justification for holding him.

                We understand that you don't care about our nation, and our laws, and that inciting fear is the only thing your side is good at. But Clinton didn't let a terrorist go. You're a liar for saying that. On top of all the other disgusting personality flaws you have.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (June 06, 2009 12:26 pm ET)
                  1  
                  LULU, bravo, you are so right about POINT OF VIEW.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by harley (June 06, 2009 11:30 am ET)
                2  
                By a terrorist Clinton let go.


                Prove it
                Report Abuse
              • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 06, 2009 4:05 pm ET)
                2  
                You mean the same Clinton who bombed their training camps and was accused (by the right) of trying to distract from the BJ investigation. Because, clearly you and your ilk, pov, made a determination at that time that it was more important to get to the bottom of your sex investigation than it was to protect us from terrorists.

                Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (June 05, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
            4  
            yea, protected us :-). Your ideology protects you from the truth. 9/11. More Americans dead and wounded in Iraq than lost on 9/11. Sad,sad sad...that you can still spew that BS,but it's afree country and your allowed to wallow in your ignorance,thank goodness your world outlook and philosophy was trounced in the last election. Wallow in the swamps of lies and fear if you like just stay out of the way of progress!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (June 05, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
            4  
            You guys always manage to forget the anthrax letters.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by harley (June 06, 2009 11:31 am ET)
            2  
            Well, at least what she said was correct.


            Apparently you forgot about 9/11. Shocking
            Report Abuse
        • Author by apostleis (June 07, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
             
          But she's citing classified reports she never saw.

          She's a liar making things up or in other words a good republican.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by markbfoot199 (June 05, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
        2
      I wonder if Liz is also more popular then Nancy Pelosi?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (June 06, 2009 4:32 pm ET)
      1  

      It's pretty low when criminals recruit their own children to make their defense.

      And if she hasn't been recruited (or manipulated) into doing this, then it's still a sign of lowness, that the only people who will come to your defense, are the ones who call you daddy.
      Report Abuse