On June 4 show, Cavuto pushes Chamberlain-Obama comparison; guest Winston Churchill III disagrees
June 05, 2009 6:34 pm ET
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















He couldn't wait to get Winnie 3 off the air.
So, averaging all that, you get a reasonable moderate guy?
I don't see Obama offering Iran anything like Chamberlain did.
CRAPUTO: "You're right -- but it was a powerful five percent."
Spoken like a true "twenty per center", Kneel . . .
Why can't we just ban all these foreigners who come here to spew nonsense like the brits did to Michael Whinner Savage
On paper, I'm sure having WC III on the show to back up FOX's latest bizarre Obama comparison looked like a pretty good idea.
What they didn't count on was that WC III would be smarter, more experienced and more reasoned than everyone at FOX, combined.
A wick with no flame.
I even think his accent is phony.
P
BARACK OBAMA: "The third source of tension is our shared interest in the rights and responsibilities of nations on nuclear weapons.
This issue has been a source of tension between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. For many years, Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country, and there is in fact a tumultuous history between us. In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government. Since the Islamic Revolution, Iran has played a role in acts of hostage-taking and violence against U.S. troops and civilians. This history is well known. Rather than remain trapped in the past, I've made it clear to Iran's leaders and people that my country is prepared to move forward. The question now is not what Iran is against, but rather what future it wants to build."
OK -- I'm gonna take a wild stab here and guess that 'ol Niley neither heard nor read Obama's speech. Am I right?
But hey, this is the Fox Comedy Channel we're talking about . . . that other guy a few days ago already admitted he wasn't going to read Judge Sotomayor's speech before criticizing it -- why should this be any different?
I'll weigh in and guess that you're wrong. My bet is he saw it but is lying.
They Cavuto tries to speech-ify him, rude beyond rude. "It was only 5% of the speech." "But it was an important 5%!"