In monologue on Holocaust Museum shooting, Beck predicts "witch hunt" against Jews and conservatives

Really?

I'm an atheist but Amen to that......"should be investigated and prosecute"

I noticed similarities in this clip to Limbaugh's style of communication. It seems to me he goes from one strain of thought to another without making himself clear as to what exactly he meant or why the next thought should appropriately follow the previous one. I don't mean that his sub points are wrong, although they often are, but that even if you suspend disbelief on that, there's no logical cohesive theme or overarching point of the commentary.

I wish they would include transcripts with these clips as I had to keep rewinding to try to see how to fit the pieces of the puzzle together, unsuccessfully. If it was written down it might fall into place...or maybe I'm kidding myself, that really this is just gibberish. But this is a prepared commentary (not an impromptu radio brainwave) on a big TV station -- shouldn't somebody normal have edited it for lucidity?

On the other hand, on the relatively infrequent occasions I've heard Limbaugh over the decades, I flatter myself that I've at times been able to decipher some of his peculiar rants, even some of the obviously off the cuff ones. So maybe it's a matter of familiarity. Maybe there is some rhyme or reason to Beck's riffs. It could be that with time, like how one learns a foreign language, it may become easier to decode him.

I just played it again. The Arab terrorist recruiter made perfect sense. Of course very evil, but one sentence flowed logically into the next and his overall meaning was very clear -- he successfully communicated what he wanted to say. Maybe Fox should get a translator for Beck too. But perhaps the idea isn't to communicate any particular set of properly sequenced ideas which together form one particular and distinct point to the audience. The idea may be to say things in such away that the Fox viewers can pick their own meanings, cafeteria style, to conform to what each one separately wants to believe. Effectively he may be narrowcasting to each individual Fox viewer. What seems gibberish to me may have been worked on by a battery of psychologists and sociologists to create this effect. And the cherry on top is that Beck can't be blamed as easily for saying what any of his audience members heard if he can't be deciphered and convincingly explained to non-Fox viewers without going into great detail and others having confidence in your ability to translate him over their own ears telling them that it's just a nonsensical mess.