About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Scarborough revises DHS report history: "what upset most of us" was "the fact not that they were targeting right-wingers, it's that they were targeting veterans"

June 12, 2009 8:56 am ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by pros2pros2940 (June 12, 2009 8:57 am ET)
      3  
      Joe can't read
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (June 12, 2009 9:19 am ET)
      9  
      Dear MSNBC and Fox,

      One of you seems to be going in a different direction than the other one. One far-right the other in the center.

      At the same time, you each have a host that is doing the same.

      MSNBC, you have an ex-Congressman from FL who may or may not have had anything to do with an interns demise who has shown to be something of a joke. Especially after his little laugh attack about right-wing extremism being dangerously on the rise and who, at times, defended torture in our names.

      Fox, you have a guy who. near as I can tell, never defended torture in our names, who seems to have not made light of the DHS report, who seems to be a bright fellow (certainly compared to the rest of your crew).

      My proposal is for you two entities to trade... "Morning" Joe Scarborough for Shepard Smith.

      Joe would fit in nicely at Fox. He does not seem much to care about the truth. Besides, I'm sure Olbermann would love to be able to finally speak out against Joe.

      Since it seems that MSNBC is going the way of the truth (not completely, but its better than nothing) and Shep seems to be finding out that a variation of truth is better than no truth at all. Plus, Shep (even thou he is at Fox, is a pretty decent host)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (June 12, 2009 9:24 am ET)
        9  
        Sounds like a fair trade. Smith will probably get canned anyway if he keeps trying to squeeze real journalism into his broadcasts.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by lookoutoftheyard2251 (June 12, 2009 11:26 am ET)
        1  
        Fox may not take. Shep's been with the network for a while now. Make the deal a little bit more sweet and send Pat Buchanan, too. I hear he's a gentleman. A shrill, racist gentleman.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by seeryer (June 12, 2009 9:24 am ET)
      7  
      Saying domestic terrerorists might TARGET returning veterans for recruitment due to their military know how and possible feelings about their experiences (ie Tim McVeigh) does not mean the DHS was "tageting" veterans. Why are conservatives so opposed to being honest with themselves?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (June 12, 2009 10:13 am ET)
        3  
        Because, they seem to lack simple reading comprehension skills, and pull out, "Returning vets.." and "extremists..." and call it good. They miss all of the words in the middle, and at the start, and at the end, and only hear, or in this case, read what they want to read.

        Thing is, this is nothing new. For example. There are a lot of street gangs all over this country, who specifically send their members into the military so that they can get combat training, arms training, explosives training, and so that, they hope, when they do their hitch, they come out, and teach these things to their fellow gang members. This has been going on for awhile. Luckily, there are some gang members who join up, and find out that their old lives were complete and utter crap, and they go on to servce our country with honor and distinction, and they thumb their noses at their former friends and gang members.

        But, thing is, it still happens. It's not hard to imagine that extremist groups would try to recruit these guys as they leave the services, especially if they are disgruntled, and or angry about their situations upon leaving the military. I don't think the vast majority will join their groups, but if they even get a few guys to sign up, it's a force multiplier, that they can bring their tactical knowledge and information to these groups, that could make them more dangerous.

        I believe that is what the report was saying.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by paul8616 (June 12, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
          1  
          Quote: "Because, they seem to lack simple reading comprehension skills, and pull out, "Returning vets.." and "extremists..." and call it good. They miss all of the words in the middle, and at the start, and at the end, and only hear, or in this case, read what they want to read."

          No one in this scenario lacks reading skills. Joe is simply re-inventing his own outrage. He's lying about his previous statements.

          And then he says crap like: Krugman's name is on the hate emails. Which makes me wonder if Von Brunn ever watched 'Morning Joe' and agreed with anything.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (June 12, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
            1  
            I'm just saying, in general, back when all the fake outrage happened the first time. Some, or all of them failed to read the words in front of their faces.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by deeznuts (June 12, 2009 10:30 am ET)
        3  
        I think ScarJoe is wrong on both counts. The DHS report didn't "target" anybody.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (June 12, 2009 11:43 am ET)
        2  
        Exactly.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by neon desert (June 12, 2009 9:32 am ET)
      4  
      Does anybody really watch this show? I mean, besides MMfA staff who are forced to. It seems like a group of people sitting around waiting for something to happen. ZZZZzzzzzzzz.....

      Anyway, I was thinking that maybe Joe should have his show on a little later in the day, give him a chance to wake up. But then I remembered Beck and Hannity and I recognized that, for some, hosting a show while awake might not be a good thing.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by lookoutoftheyard2251 (June 12, 2009 11:31 am ET)
        2  
        I used to if I could catch it, but now that Obama has taken office and Joe has a book coming out, he's unbearable. When he's not complaining that everything the President is doing is wrong, he's hocking that tome of his. It's awful.

        You want to know what his show's like once he's had a chance to wake up? I mean, really? Try listening to his radio show on WABC at 10am. That is, if you want to give yourself a valid reason to hate yourself for the rest of the day.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Max Credits (June 12, 2009 9:34 am ET)
      5  
      Setting aside Joe's clear and present error about "what upset most of us" in the DHS report, I would be willing to accept his "there's hate on both sides" theory if it weren't for one pesky little detail; that growing list of cold blooded murders committed but right wing extremists... I'm have trouble today seeing comparable hate "on both sides" when only one side has a growing body count.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DS1978 (June 12, 2009 10:35 am ET)
        1  
        You are forgetting all the "bad" email they are getting. We all know that you can equate a nasty email sent to a media commentator with murder.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rightiswrong (June 12, 2009 9:54 am ET)
      2  
      I’ve always suspected that Joe Scarborough misrepresents his experiences practicing law. For example, yesterday in an interview with Kathleen Sebelius Scarborough spoke of how he saw doctors practicing defensive medicine ”time and time again” “when I defended doctors as an attorney”. He then told a story about a doctor he apparently represented who correctly diagnosed a gall bladder problem and who was sued by a patient who subsequently had a heart attack and against whom a jury returned a $5 million verdict. Scarborough then said, “We got it reversed on appeal…”

      Scarborough was admitted to the Florida bar in 1991 and was elected to Congress in 1994. Therefore, he practiced law for about 3 years. In the real world, attorneys with 3 years experience do not defend doctors in medical malpractice claims. And as far as the case that he discussed, there are NO reported appellate decisions in Florida that show Scarborough as the attorney of record. In fact, there appear to be no cases decided by the Florida First District Court of Appeals, which considers appeals arising from the Scarborough's Pensacola area, which involved facts similar to those related by Scarborough.

      Is Scarborough really a straight talker as his new book would have us believe? Me thinks not.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne (June 12, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
        3  
        People like Joe Scarborugh seem to be able to ascend to a particular place, not because of any inherent goodness or greatness or even talent and certainly not imagination.

        But by sheer force of personality and looks, they bulldoze and bully their way along the continuum. I'm still feeling sorry for the guy who had to sit through Joe's little diatribe about Jon Stewart the other day. Oy.

        I have zero regard for this smug, shrill and overbearing type of person.

        And hey, Joe. Nothing in the DHS report "targets" veterens. They are simply filing facts and figures and probabilities to keep our country safe from whomever wishes to do harm.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Bronwyn (June 13, 2009 8:25 am ET)
           
        GOOD JOB!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pauldeman (June 12, 2009 10:04 am ET)
      4 1
      Haven't these people learned from the politicians they've covered? The issue would be over if they would just admit that they were wrong to belittle the report. Also, the way they tried to embarrass Napolitano (saying that they should not have agreed to the terms of interview) after her interview was just unprofessional. Napolitano went on the show a few days later to explain the H1N1 flu and was gracious. It made Mika and Joe look like small, vindictive, self-serving.

      Good job, MM.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by budrykzp9226 (June 12, 2009 10:29 am ET)
      3  
      Whereas it upsets ME how little you care that the DHS report didn't do either of those things.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LynnTTT (June 12, 2009 10:35 am ET)
      2  
      Nice try Joe: you and Mika were laughing at the report, saying this was a "funny story", saying "Janet Napolitano was nuts, etc. The outrage at the veterans was only one part. The complaints from other right wing commentators: the government wants us to be afraid of conservatives, trying to stifle their critics, Right Wing is on the rise and they are worried, etc. The killer at the Holocaust Museum had a note; the first line was "you want to take away my guns? This is the only way you'll get them." The RW has continually spouted the "Obama wants to take away your guns " mantra to the point this guy decided to do something about it. And do something about it is what the RW commentators have been asking someone to do. They are guilty.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jim Rockford (June 12, 2009 10:45 am ET)
      5  
      Phony Joe doesn't care about the truth. He is a typical Carl-Rovian type of liar and distorter, pretending to be reasonable. Any fringe issue that can be distorted against Democrats in a cynical way, he is on top of.

      In his new book, telling how repubs can regain power, he omits this sort of thing -- getting away from the Rovian disregard for the truth. (The book is only #81 on Amazon, despite massive promotion, LOL.)

      One particular example: This morning he (and others on the show) fell into the Palin lie that Letterman was joking about the 14-year-old. Joe knows it was about the 18-year-old.


      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (June 12, 2009 11:42 am ET)
        4  
        I would love to see Dave bring up Palin refusing to provide kits to rape victims.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Jim Rockford (June 12, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
          1  
          LOL. That would be effective. I agree Dave should not drop this. It's not an Imus-type of career killer. He survives. He should never make a joke about teenagers again -- that was in bad taste, which he acknowledged. But Palin has turned something that initially got her sympathy, even from Democrats, into something where she is now in the wrong. He should do what he can to discredit Palin, and I'm sure he is angry enough now to be motivated to do an effective job on her.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (June 12, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
            1  
            Palin does enough to discredit herself.

            Honestly, she should be above this fray, and shouldn't have said really anything at all, but she can't resist trying to be in the limelight and media coverage. She just can't help herself.

            If she had more or less ignored this, as in, if someone asked her about the comments, she should have just said, "I thought that they were in bad taste, but Dave Letterman hasn't really been funny in years..." and leave it at that. Instead, she's riding the circuit again, claiming to be victimized by someone in the "media".

            Report Abuse
            • Author by wookie (June 12, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
              1  
              Her response has been calculated all of the way. From the way she deflected attention from the most obvious knocked up daughter, to using the word rape, to saying that Hollywood entertainers don't understand degradation of women like just plain folks do, to saying that Letterman couldn't be trusted around 14 year olds. She wanted to score some "culture war" points but she isn't too subtle about it.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Bronwyn (June 13, 2009 8:37 am ET)
                 
              If she was truly offended why is she working so hard at keeping it out there, making sure it is repeated over and over? Seems like she would want it stopped immediately. She and her husband Jethro Clampett are thriving on the attention.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (June 14, 2009 11:24 am ET)
           
        If it was about the eighteen yr old then why didn't he name her by name? The fourteen yr old was the girl at Yankee Stadium, so the joke HAD to be about her.

        Notice Dave hasn't clarified either. Statutory Rape is a crime in NY last time I checked...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (June 14, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
          1  
          Notice Dave hasn't clarified either. Statutory Rape is a crime in NY last time I checked...


          Dave made a lousy joke.

          Sarah Palin, as a parent, had every right to object to David's joke.

          David said his joke was a mistake, he apologized,.....the end...... .........

          Except Sarah Palin needs attention. ANY kind of attention will do.
          So Palin bank rolled a bad joke about her 18 year old daughter and sex, into statutory rape and self esteem issues for young women.

          But if Sarah truly was concerned about her daughter being in the public eye, don't you think she would have stopped after Dave apologized? If Sarah really wanted less attention paid to her children why appear on any and every television show that would have her? Why turn around and insinuate that Dave should be left alone with a 14 year old girl?

          Ahhh, the truth.

          This fake outrage isn't about Palin's children, rape or a young girls self esteem, it's about Palin needing to make news, any kind of news.

          After all, IF Sarah was concerned about the 'public' and her 'children' she would have left them at home during the presidential campaign. IF Palin wasn't trying to USE her OWN children as a campaign poster for so called 'family values' they would have been in the care of her parents, still in school, out of the public eye.

          But they weren't.

          At almost every campaign stop, day or night, Sarah trotted out her children. Palin even announced on the campaign trail that her daughter was pregnant and then proceeded to put that same pregnant daughter, along with her other children, on stage at every campaign stop.

          I've heard some ask what would be said IF the joke had been about Obama's kids.

          And I gotta say, there wouldn't have been a joke about Sasha and Malia. Michelle and Barack Obama rarely allow their children out in public. Even now, living in the White House, you see very little of the girls.

          They have parents who don't use them for props or pimp in public appearances. They have parents who don't place their children in the spotlight.

          The same CANNOT be said for Palin.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by twseattle (June 12, 2009 11:06 am ET)
      6  
      The local police have issued warnings to parents that children wandering too far away from their parents at public events are vulnerable to kidnapping.

      What bothers me about this is the way the police are targeting children.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Entitled (June 12, 2009 11:31 am ET)
           
        What bothers me about this is the way the police are targeting children.

        Are parents supposed to pay protection money to the police? Do they take PayPal?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (June 12, 2009 11:49 am ET)
        2  
        TOUCHE!!!!!! Does this show that children are smarter than Scarborough!??..Hahahahahahaha
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (June 12, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
          1  
          TOUCHE!!!!!! Does this show that children are smarter than Scarborough!??..Hahahahahahaha

          I have rocks in my back yard that are smarter than Joe Scarborough. :-)
          Report Abuse
    • Author by knokko10 (June 12, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
      1  
      Mika is the one who should be criticized here. To sit there and tolerate that oaf's rambling commentary. Remember how her father came on and called him out. I guess money and success is worth one's pride and principles. This is America dammit!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tonyrich300 (June 12, 2009 12:45 pm ET)
      1  
      Once again, when is MSNBC going to get rid of Joe Scarborough????
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tonyrich300 (June 12, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
      2  
      Is it just me or does Mika just seem like a DUMMY who simply nods at everything Scarborough says.
      When is MSNBC going to get rid of Joe Scarborough???
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne (June 12, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
        2 1
        From what little I know of this show, it seems Mika is actually quite a bit smarter than Joe actually. And more fair minded.

        She could stand to be a lot more forceful though. She often looks wimpy and vanilla compared with Joe who is a first class bully.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Bronwyn (June 13, 2009 8:40 am ET)
           
        It'a just you. hahahahahahah
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (June 14, 2009 11:26 am ET)
           
        Dizzy comes to mind. She got her job because of her dad. There is another thread on Liz and dad that is very similar...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 12, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
      5  
      Do we really have to all pretend to be so stupid as to pretend that a veteran of our military has never joined an anti-government or terrorist group? Really? Just so the far right (almost none of whom are veterans) will pretend to be outraged, we have to keep honesty out of law enforcement and pretend like veterans are not exactly the ones that anti-government and domestic terrorist groups have always targeted for recruitment? Once AGAIN, the Republican party is unable to have an adult conversation. And Scarborough is not even one of the most stupid or most idealogical of them.

      This is what has become of my Republican party. I am so frickin' sick and tired of being sick and tired of hearing nonsense upon more nonsense from this party! Has this party not yet hit rock bottom? How low can they possibly go before we are forced to create a 3rd party just to maintain any honesty out of the Democratic party? This is actually hurting America at this point.

      Republicans - you sold your soul to the dimwits in this nation and you are now being run by them - spending everyday defending them and their phony outrage at nonsense. You are being controlled by media personalities who play characters on the radio and on TV. What the hell is it going to take? John Danforth where are you?!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (June 14, 2009 11:39 am ET)
        1 1
        The problem with linking returning military with extremism is that the actual report didn't give specifics but generalized the threat. By contrast the DHS report on left wing terrorists supplied us with names and organizations.

        The DHS report also asserts with no evidence that an unquantified “resurgence in rightwing extremist recruitment and radicalizations activity” is due to home foreclosures, job losses, and…the historical presidential election.

        The problem is that if the administration is allowed to target veterans with this type of rhetoric while applying a political twist. Now if the report could site SPECIFIC named groups, then we could have the adult conversation you so long for.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by tjmccool2284 (June 12, 2009 2:40 pm ET)
      2  
      Ah, Joe Scarborough who said: Joe Scarborough mused aloud about whether liberals "hate George Bush so much that they are cheering for Terri's death only because the president of the United States and his brother are fighting for Terri's life." (MMFA 3/25/05)

      Or this? "I am not claiming that this doctor is a charlatan. I don't know his body of work. I am not claiming that he is a hired gun....But too many doctors out there can be bought off by attorneys on either side. And then they come out, instead of telling you the facts..."

      Report Abuse