Bruce: Obama "destroying everything" because he's "getting back at" parents
June 12, 2009 10:39 am ET
From the June 11 edition of The Tammy Bruce Show:


The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles|
|
||
![]() |
||
Tammy Bruce, you should seek help immediately, find a good liberal therapist - do it soon, your sanity is hanging by a thread.
signed - An American who is proud of President Barack Hussein Obama
p.s. Right Wing, please keep this up, I love seeing your agony.
And now he holds the highest office in the land, and since part of this conspiracy theory is that the fix is in at the highest levels of government, there ain't nothin' you can do about this menace legally. So basically the antichrist --and not just basically but literally according to some of the more extreme commentators-- is the president. What's a moral person to do?
Prior to these last few weeks, vigilantism might have seemed the only solution. But following Tiller's murder and the Holocaust Museum shooting, even the most rabid conservatives must be realizing that if anything happens to Obama, it would seal contemporary American conservatism's doom, or at least decimate the movement for decades. On the other hand, they're convinced that if Obama proceeds without vigilante opposition.... then the exact same thing will happen to the conservative movement.
It must really suck to be a conservative talk show host right now.
If I had a mind to, I wouldn't want to be like you..."
"And if I had time to, I wouldn't wanna talk to you."
Must resist the urge to say.....
"These are not the droids you are looking for."
Damn, I failed again.
In the ever expanding world of crazy right wingers, they are all trying to one up each other to say the stupidest/craziest/looniest thing.
Tammy Bruce is trying to get back her "street cred" by notching it up a few levels. I'm sure Limbaugh et all, will respond in kind.
Mag, The crazy is just vomiting out of her. Seriously, I've known enough crazy people that I don't think this is an act.That sort of paranoia and detachment from reality is tough to fake.
I was ragging on one of the wingnuts here a while back for saying that somebody (maybe it was directed at this site) had "jumped the shark yet again". That term has always applied to a one-time-only, no turning back event, and I was having a little fun pointing out another concept that seemed too hard to grasp for the typical dittohead.
It looks like I may owe that person an apology. The right wing media seems to be constantly making the craziest statements imaginable, then somehow managing to dwarf those comments within a day or two.
I like when she says, just before laying down her thesis, "make a note of this..". I can picture her fans surrounded by 3 x 5 cards and crayons, furiously scrawling notes. Bats88t crazy notes all over their squalid bunkers.
I'm sure what she's really trying to get at, is that Obama has "daddy" issues, being that his biological father was not around much, or at all for him. And blah, blah, blah... I'm surprised she didn't throw in a, "This is a great example of why marriage needs to be between a man and a woman, and why kids need to be brought up in a home with a father and a mother..."
her point=Obama bad. Marriage between WHITE men & women only!
These Neo-cons are possessed.
Who knows what mileage these whackos can get from one single talking point. Gotta admit - even though they're dangerous and full of hatred and intolerance, they're at least creative!
(I'm sorry. I don't care what to people want to do with each other, I really don't, but that name is just HORRIBLE. *shudder*)
Bruce's Web site describes her as "an openly gay, pro-choice,
gun owning, pro-death penalty "progressive feminist" who has voted for presidents as diverse as Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.
She seems like a more interesting individula than Malkin or Ingrham, but I'll still take Maddow any day. (After all, Wiki also makes Beck, Hannity and O'Rielly sound almost moderate.)
Yes - Bill O'Reilly. And we all know how emotionally balanced HE is....
I know what my wife the nurse will say when she hears this cretin.
"She'd better never wind up as my patient."
Also, there are some signs that the economy is recovering. How long do you think it will be before we have conservatives saying that it is recovering because of George W. Bush, and not anything Obama did?
That's what they did for all of the Clinton years. Claimed the stellar economy was because of GHW Bush.
And I know, not everybody had great times, least of all me. The point is the only way Bush got his second term, even against a candidate as lackluster as Kerry, was he bought the election. The consequenses of that are only starting to hit us. Remember him touring agricultural areas carving out huge subsidies for farmers?
I keep thinking of what my grandpa said to me during the 2000 election. "You haven't seen what the republicans can do to the economy." Other than the portrait of FDR he kept (his brother painted it) in the farmhouse, I never heard him say anything about politics. And he had teenagers in the 60's!
(I still don't know where to find electric pencils to put in those things. Don't even ask me about electric vacuum cleaners...)
The drooling, idiot base... duly frightened and pi$$ed off, will donate money to the RNC in a desperate attempt to save the Republic. With the huge resulting War Chest, they will nominate one of the few remaining Republican moderates for 2012, who will pretend that none of this stuff was ever said.
Either that, or they're all just batsh*t crazy. Take your pick.
Remember when Bob Woodward asked W if he had consulted his dad about Iraq and W said there was a greater father he talked to about it? (He meant God or Cheney, I'm not sure which.) And how the Cheeney/Bush regime marginalized Scowcroft, Powell and any other Poppy partisans still extant during their maladministration?
And how about picking Cheney for VP? W had to know about the Cheney/Rumsfeld attempt to kill Poppy's presidential aspirations with the CIA appointment when they were in the Nixon White House.
Yet he takes Cheney as a surrogate dad.
Let's wait to judge Obama's psyche for at least one term. If he hasn't septupled the deficit, plunged us into numerous wars of choice, isolated us from the entire world and completely destroyed the middle class, then we can see how the daddy-issues contest has played out.
Daddy issues. From a right-wing radio nutjob. You've got to be kidding me.
Yet he takes Cheney as a surrogate dad." -- cdmsr
Interesting point you bring up. In Jacob Weisberg's book, The Bush Tragedy, he describes how Bush's daddy issues not only led him to attempt to prove himself superior to his father in many ways {the Iraq War, the flight suit photo-op}, but also to pick his own surrogate family: where his blood family had GHW and Barbara as parents, his surrogate one had Cheney and Rice; where his blood family's homestead was Connecticut, his surrogate one, Crawford . . .
Egads.
At least Obama's so called issues are trying to help people not KILL them