About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

MSNBC's Shuster exposes Liz Cheney's "American exceptionalism" falsehood about Obama

June 12, 2009 5:43 pm ET

From the 4 p.m. ET hour of MSNBC Live on June 12:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (June 12, 2009 5:50 pm ET)
      1  
      when on tape, one must become a moving target, moving faster than googling such tapes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (June 12, 2009 5:58 pm ET)
      1  
      And another right winger is exposed for lying. You could make a drinking game out of that...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (June 12, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
        1  
        From this moment on, anything liz Cheney claims is suspect. It is characterised as " credibility ". Which cements her career at FOX and nowhere else.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by deeznuts (June 12, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
          2  
          Uh...I've been taking everything Liz Cheney says as "suspect" since she started talking. "From this moment on" is merely a continuation of same.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by robyn20094113 (June 13, 2009 6:02 am ET)
               
            Every thing she says as "suspect" Every thing she says is quite often a provable lie.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (June 12, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
        3  
        I guess it runs in the family.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (June 12, 2009 6:36 pm ET)
        1  
        I have,although we did it like a true or false thing, like this statement from such and such is true or false or true or false this or that person said this, if you got it wrong you took a shot of jack. But I played with some well informed people and we just wound up taking shots for fun becuase no one was missing the answers. Maybe if we played with some cons it would be more fun.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by tman418 (June 12, 2009 9:56 pm ET)
        1  
        Shots of Wild Turkey, 101 proof.

        You should also do that while watching the Republican Convention in 2004. Drink everytime you hear "9/11".
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (June 12, 2009 6:16 pm ET)
        8
      Barack think HE and his Ivy League chums are exceptional.

      I think he needed the teleprompter to say that.

      Did you see him almost cough through that speech?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by deeznuts (June 12, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
        3  
        I'm searching for a point in your post, but I can't find it.

        Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (June 12, 2009 6:23 pm ET)
        3  
        What bearing does this have on Liz Cheney not telling the truth about what Obama said or did not say?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mescal (June 13, 2009 1:30 am ET)
          1  
          Nothing. Cheney is a troll who is attempting to divert this thread.

          Pathetic.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (June 12, 2009 6:28 pm ET)
           
        So, this is your response to the outright lie that Liz Cheney presented? Why not respond to Liz Cheney instead of trying to tell us all what is in President Obama's head?

        You see, we can only judge people by their words and actions. So far, i am much more impressed with our president's words and actions than i am by Liz Cheney's - we have more proof that comes to us every day - but, rather than admit that she is a liar, you have to make some infantile conjecture about the duly elected president of our great country?

        What kind of credibility should we give to you when you are so far in denial that you would rather guess about what is someone's head than speak about what one of your heroes has actually said. She either never paid much attention to what President Obama said, or she just chose to lie about it - those are the only two choices. (Well, I'll grant one more choice: someone else writes her talking points for her.)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (June 12, 2009 6:28 pm ET)
        1  
        SQUIRREL!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (June 12, 2009 7:39 pm ET)
        2  
        You said you like to have sex with sheep and blow goats for fun?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (June 12, 2009 6:49 pm ET)
      3  
      Hasn't MSNBC had her on multiple times? I agree with what Shuster is saying about her lying and hypocrisy but they are among those who are giving her a platform?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pags2 (June 12, 2009 9:03 pm ET)
      2  
      Shuster did what every respectable news organization should be doing-exposing the lies and misrepresentations without regard to political viewpoint. Of course, I would surmise that there are a lot of conservatives that are going to be exposed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (June 13, 2009 1:33 am ET)
        2  
        You'd think that would be obvious, wouldn't you? Apparently not when it comes to the corporate media. You'd almost think that they had an agenda other than informing the public and exposing the truth. ;o)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by robyn20094113 (June 13, 2009 6:08 am ET)
             
          Rupert Murdoch, agenda? Surely you jest?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pags2 (June 13, 2009 8:16 pm ET)
          1  
          The mainstream media needs to do more regarding this sort of lies. They need to take Fox, Cheney and everyone else to task for these lies and distortions. I think the mainstream media dismissed a lot of this crazy talk until Tiller and the museum killing. Now they understand that this has gone beyond words.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ochaye (June 14, 2009 9:18 pm ET)
               
            Since the media is concentrated in 5 large corporations, I wouldn't wait for the "mainstream media" to challenge the lies in any effective way.
            CNN and the traditional 3 networks sell add space. There is no incentive in going after the right, that might cost viewers. If you get "both sides" on, everybody has something to yell at. And you don't look "liberal" to boot.
            It's the dumbing down, weeehaaaa superficial treatment of the issues that bothers me most. The anchors are dumber than the average viewer.
            PBS ... BBC....CBC... they rock.
            Report Abuse