About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

New Limbaugh argument against public health care plan: "[T]here's no federal dog healthcare plan out there, and it's working just fine"

June 15, 2009 1:49 pm ET

From the June 15 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by o rly (June 15, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
      4  
      What a stupid analogy. And why does Rush feel he's qualified to speak for everyone in the country? I bet a lot of his mindless dittoheads would greatly benefit from a public plan.

      Obviously Rush doesn't care a bit, he makes $40 million a year and can afford the most lavish private insurance.

      And let's not even mention that Limbaugh is (intentionally) confusing public health care with public health insurance. What we need is public health insurance. Private doctors are just fine thank you very much.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (June 15, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
        4  
        And why does Rush feel he's qualified to speak for everyone in the country?

        Hold on there... Rush only speaks for the less than 22% of our fellow citizens, you know... the ones that can't help but be led by their noses!

        What's damn hilarious is that there is even one person somewhere in America that will actually be brain dead enough to think that Rush's stupid analogy makes sense...

        How can something that does not exist (federal level dog health-care) be working just fine??

        As for Universal Single Payer Health-care...

        IT IS NOT ABOUT THE HEALTH-CARE THAT EXISTS IN THIS COUNTRY... IT IS ABOUT BEING ABLE TO ACCESS ALL THAT GREAT HEALTH-CARE!!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (June 15, 2009 4:12 pm ET)
          2  
          Correct. If you listen between the lines, Rush is advocating a healthcare system that caters only to those who have the money to pay for it. No surprise there.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (June 15, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
          1  
          "Hold on there... Rush only speaks for the less than 22% of our fellow citizens, you know... the ones that can't help but be led by their noses!" - captfoster2


          Actually cap, Limpballs speaks for his listers; that's maybe .000001% of our fellow citizens -- on a good day.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by budrykzp9226 (June 15, 2009 2:03 pm ET)
      3  
      I guess Rush voted for Romney.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (June 15, 2009 2:06 pm ET)
      3  
      Wow. This is lame, even for Limdog. Please tell me that there aren't more than 3 people out there who think he's made a valid point here.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (June 15, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
        4  
        Unfortunately, I'm sure that there are.

        Rush, as someone else pointed out, I'm sure has no issues with his healthcare plan. I'd be willing to guess that he doesn't even have to pay for any of his own healthcare, he's such a big name, I'm sure his company ponies up for his plan, no doubt about it.

        It's the classic case of, I've got mine, so I don't need to worry about anyone else!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jlw7717595 (June 15, 2009 3:30 pm ET)
          2  
          Actually I used to be a listener to his show, but since I am educated now I can't stand him. However, he bragged on numerous occasions that he has all the money in the world so he pays for everything out of pocket. He absolutly has no stake in this healthcare debate except to lament the fact that the taxes on his $35 million dollar a year income would go up a slight percentage to pay for others to have a chance to live when plagued by disease. That is almost evil in my opinion.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (June 15, 2009 3:40 pm ET)
            2  
            Exactly. People like Rush don't even need health insurance, he would have to be on life support for 20 years to even come close to using up his vast fortune.

            That's why it's so remarkable that the working people in his audience would give him any credibility at all on this topic.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jlw7717595 (June 15, 2009 7:26 pm ET)
              1  
              This is the same type of comparison always made on his show. It never fails, some Dittohead calls in a compares something like buying gas at $2.40 per gallon with buying milk at $3.25 and says "well we don't complain about that." It is comparing two different things. People don't have to have milk to survive and, I don't know about you, but I don't use gallons of milk every day. It is quite on par with comparing the healthcare system for dogs to that for humans. Yes, the private sector might do a good job for dogs in providing options for care. Prices are much lower and lets face it,many of us will go our entire life without having pets, while every one of us will get sick multiple times. Hey, if prices got to high we could just get rid of the dog, but you can't get rid of your child if he or she has cancer. If you are a Dittohead reading this don't you think we should take human healthcare a little more seriously than Rush is taking it. I mean, it doesn't cost $50,000 to provide our dog room and board for a week in a Kennel, which I think proves that, while the free market works well for animals, it is horrible for humans. I just think that Rush and all you pro-lifers out there actually admitting your real attitude about human life; that it is no more sacred than that of a Cocker Spaniel.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Bronwyn (June 15, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
            1  
            I nearly felt blind rage when I listened to this because he can & does brainwash so many of his followers to vote against the very thing they themselves need. They are oblivious to this fact.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by goesto11 (June 15, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
      8  
      And what would our society be like if we used the same model for human health care that we use for doggy health care?

      No family would ever go bankrupt due to health care costs, because we'd simply euthanize anyone who is diagnosed with a serious illness, just like we do with dogs.

      Oh, right. The fact that we're HUMAN does complicate things, doesn't it?

      I want to laugh at the absurdity of Limbaugh, but I can't laugh at anything as dangerous as he is.




      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbrantow (June 15, 2009 2:28 pm ET)
      3  
      I wonder how much the surgery and post op care for limbaugh's hearing loss cost.....due to his over indulging in his illegal oxycontin habit ? Where would he be without ins. He would be whining and complaining that his addiction was someone else's fault. Chicken hawk draft dodger.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by vysotsky (June 15, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
      3  
      I hope Limbaugh sticks with this brilliant idea. Especially this part:

      Limbaugh: "Whenever you hear, whenever you hear a liberal promise government help that will give you universal care, better care, at lower cost, whenever you hear that just sit back and you know what your response ought to be? Arf arf arf! Just bark like your dog does! Because your dog has it! Without the government being involved. And this is not a -- this is not a conclusion that, that is out of bounds or a stretch."


      That's right, dear Limbaugh fans. The next time you get into a serious policy discussion with someone who advocates universal healthcare, just start barking. That's sure to help you win the argument. Just answer a rational argument with canine yelping. Then insist that this is not "out of bounds or a stretch."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (June 15, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
        3  
        Well, if my doctors start charging me say $50/visit like my vet does for my pets, I'd be willing to forego insurance, and pay for it myself. But since costs for humans are substantially higher, I won't hold my breath, or relinquish my insurance.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by vysotsky (June 15, 2009 4:44 pm ET)
          1  
          Well, to really follow through with the veterinary health care model, you wouldn't have to pay no matter how much the procedure costs. Your master would.

          Huh. Come to think of it, America has tried this particular health care model with human beings before.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by sharonsj (June 15, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
      3  
      First of all, you can get health insurance for pets--if you can afford it. I can't. And out here in rural PA, I've seen people, who can't afford a vet bill, put a bullet in their dog's head. At least the dog is put out of its misery; us humans, who can't afford doctor bills, just suffer and die.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (June 15, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
      4  
      The obvious flaw in Limpdog's argument is that dogs do not have universal healthcare in this country... nothing close to it.

      What percentage of America's dogs have access to this wonderful "private sector solution" that Rush is so proud of? I'd be extremely surprised if it even approaches a tenth of one percent.

      Of course, Limpdog has inadvertently outlined his actual preference... Healthcare for the privileged few.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by vysotsky (June 15, 2009 3:45 pm ET)
        5  
        Indeed, though as you say, that's just the obvious flaw. The subtler flaws might include, oh...

        ...How is it that the private sector treating you like a dog is a good thing?

        ...Dogs don't pay for their own healthcare, which would make them the ultimate welfare recipients.

        ...One of the most common procedures for animals is euthanasia, which somewhat complicates this analogy for those who identify as "pro life".

        ...Check me on this, but I was under the impression that most states actually do support public departments of animal care and control, and that among the duties of these departments are vaccinations, spaying and neutering, euthanazation, etc.. So even among domestic animals, the idea that there's no government involvement in health care is just plain false.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (June 15, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
      3  
      Oh, I almost forgot.... the other HUGE flaw in this line of reasoning is that Limpdog's precious "private sector" has been running our healthcare system for decades, and they haven't solved the problem yet. Why should we expect them to do so now?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by budrykzp9226 (June 15, 2009 3:39 pm ET)
      2  
      Well, given Rush's opinion on his sh*t and its lack of stinking, I guess it's only natural he'd feel an affinity with an animal that eats it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (June 15, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
      1  
      The saddest part of this, as with most Limpdog postings, is that there are literally millions of dittobots sitting in their cars, lapping this up like a dog eating its own vomit.

      They're all excited, and can't wait to get back to the office and obliterate their liberal co-workers with this brilliant piece of Limpdog Logic.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (June 15, 2009 4:10 pm ET)
      2  
      Sorry, but the more I look at this, the angrier I get.

      Blimpy says, "And it's working just fine". No sh*t.

      I suppose our human healthcare system would work "just fine" if it were limited to those who could afford to pay. I'm sure it would be quite streamlined and efficient, just like Rush's Doggy Healthcare.



      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bronwyn (June 15, 2009 4:37 pm ET)
        1  
        Many hard working folks can not afford a dog or health-care.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Bronwyn (June 15, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
      1  
      RUSH, YOU INSANE, CLUELESS, ASS!!! How many dogs are put to sleep everyday because someone could not afford health-care for them. The dog owners that can afford this type of care for their dogs, can well afford health-care for themselves. We are concerned for those that not only can NOT afford a dog but can not afford health-care for themselves.

      This is the same man that bragged about the recession not affecting him while the co. that pays him that obscene salary laid off or fired over 3,000 employees because it could no longer afford to pay them. Did not bother Rush his own words, he chose to ignore it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (June 15, 2009 4:31 pm ET)
        1  
        Apparently there are still enough dipsticks out there who fantasize that they, too, will one day be filthy rich. Therefore, they idolize a serial liar who epitomizes the rich, self-centered narcissist they hope to become.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bronwyn (June 15, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
          1  
          I do not get it. I can not go to the Post Office, grocery store, utility co, bank or anywhere without hearing someone stating with conviction some ridiculous opinion that I know they are repeating from Rush's show. They usually appear to need the very things they are fighting against. Yet they really believe Rush, Hannity, Savage, Beck and the likes are looking out for them. It does not occure to them that these people resent paying taxes on their obscene income that would help these hard working schleps one bit.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by cpinva (June 15, 2009 5:58 pm ET)
      3  
      bear in mind, mr. limbaugh has absolutely no interest in anyone else's health care; he has a wonderful insurance plan that supports all his various addictions, paid for by his employer. why should he give two nanny-goat sh**s about anyone else?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pags2 (June 15, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
        1  
        Well said. It is time for the Dems to stop trying to debate Republicans and the conservative media. The Dems need to take the issue of health care directly to the voters. Then the voters will see that the opposition to the plan is a lot of hooey.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (June 15, 2009 7:07 pm ET)
      1  
      He is just anngry because he is the Republican Party's b@@tch.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (June 15, 2009 11:27 pm ET)
      1  
      Why do we even have doctors? There are plenty of veterinarians out there who would love more work!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 16, 2009 10:37 am ET)
      1  
      "[T]here's no federal dog healthcare plan out there, and it's working just fine"
      Here's what I don't understand about this sentence: How can something that doesn't exist be "working just fine"?
      Report Abuse