About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Boehlert: "I think conservatives are confusing being in the minority with being victims of liberal bias"

June 17, 2009 8:08 pm ET

From the June 17 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by snoopy (June 17, 2009 8:17 pm ET)
      6 1
      Oh, snap! Eric, I wish you could plan a few more zingers like that in advance, you said a mouthful with that bumper sticker slogan!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bruce1ace (June 17, 2009 9:08 pm ET)
        3 3
        Boehlert shouldn't confuse Republicans with conservatives. Conservatives haven't had a party to rely on for quite a while. I'm pretty happy with how conservative some of Obama's positions are.

        If he holds true to the deficit reduction I think good times are coming.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (June 17, 2009 10:12 pm ET)
          6  
          good point, bruce. I hope real conservatives do get some bipartisanship out of this. Now if y'all could just knock those idiots in charge out and return the republican party to conservative control, I'd be more prone to supporting more conservative positions.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by the Grey Path (June 17, 2009 11:29 pm ET)
          2 1
          Oh please ... George Bush was Ronald Reagan II.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 18, 2009 8:43 am ET)
          3  
          Deficit reduction in and of itself will not lead to anything. Raising taxes is not a GOOD THING and cutting spending is not a GOOD THING. (And if you think either is, you FAIL macro-econ 101.) If the economy improves the gov't will have good oppotunities to reduce the deficit. But gov't actions (via the budget, taxing and speding) will not affect the trajectory of the economy one iota - It can only shift the curve up or down. Deficit reduction will be the RESULT of "good times" not the cause.

          And I'm frankly tired of hearing about how all the Republican failures lately come down to them "not being conservtaive enough." Yuu know what ELSE isn't "conservatove enough," at least according to your measure? AMERICA.

          Republicans have bad ideas, and "real" conservatives have worse ideas. The country is not moving to embrace a farther irght ideolgy. The Demoncrats might have moved to the right to capture more of the center (this happened about 20 to 30 years ago however) but the CENTER has moved to the LEFT. (This has also been going of for about the last 20 years as well.)

          You're just being Republican / Conservative apologists now.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bruce1ace (June 18, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
               
            I agree the center has moved left on some issues. That's fine.

            The controlling party has to govern from the middle if they want to retain power. That's the deal.

            Obama agrees with me as far as deficit reduction. It has to start now. Your comment that deficit reduction will not lead to anything is perhaps true, but deficit explosion definitely leads to something, and it's economic disaster in the long run.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Trideo555 (June 18, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
               
            The Center have been moving to the left since the birth of poltics in this country. Today's liberals are tommorows conservatives, that always been the way it is. Look at the gay marriage issue, 50 years ago it was all about interracial marriage. The Republicans said all the same things about that then that they say now about gay marriage, but that issue isn't debated today anymore. It's accepted by just about everyone as a normal thing.

            Republicans today are all about these type of attention getting issues today, a true conservative wouldn't want the government to have the authority to govern these type of social issues. Someone like Ron Paul is a real conservative, he has some pretty radical ideas and I certainly don't agree with most of them but he can bring up some good points. If Republicans today were true conservatives they would be much more respectable.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (June 18, 2009 11:10 am ET)
          3  
          I disagree. If Democrats can be equated with liberals then Republicans can be equated with conservatives. It may not be 100% accurate all the time but Republicans are conservatives whether you like it or not. But you're right about Obama. He's fairly conservative as was Bill Clinton. That's why it was such a joke when the right tried to label him as the most liberal Senator.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (June 17, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
      10 1
      What an unbelievable bunch of whining hypocrites.

      Bosell actually has the gall to complain about ABC giving time to Obama after Fox News gained full access to softball exculsive interviews to GW Bush & Cheney for 8 years.

      Even now, Fox News serves as THE media outlet for Bush apologists.

      Conservatives are pathetic sore losers.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (June 17, 2009 9:39 pm ET)
        3 1
        For the last 16 years... they were sore winners as well... so they have had plenty of practice to refine their whining!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (June 17, 2009 8:24 pm ET)
      3  
      Gee, isn't it great, with all the whining about ABC not letting Faux News run their interview/town hall, how George W. Bush never had selected audiences for all his speeches.

      \irony

      BTW.. how often did Faux refer to "Mr. Bush" when Winky was in office?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (June 17, 2009 8:46 pm ET)
      3  
      How did someone from MMFA get on FOX?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by AverageTodd (June 17, 2009 10:00 pm ET)
        3 1
        Because FOX is Fair and Balanc... I can't write it with a straight face.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by lookoutoftheyard2251 (June 17, 2009 11:00 pm ET)
        3 1
        Well, this is Special Report, the one show on Fox that has to pretend to be unbiased. They had to let him on to balance out Brett Bozell. And hey, you know the audience didn't listen to Boehlert, anyway. He was telling the truth, after all.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by puppienrainbows (June 18, 2009 11:14 am ET)
          3
        Because Fox is fair and balanced. You will never see a conservative on Countdown just as you will never see conservative voices on MMFA.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 18, 2009 11:52 am ET)
          3  
          What the hell are you talking about?! I LOVE all the conservative voices I hear on MMFA! You guys are 90% of the reason I come here!

          Not to mention that every article they write includes the voice of a conservative. Of course... that voice always happens to be LYING, but that's hardly MMFA's fault!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (June 18, 2009 12:32 pm ET)
          2  
          You sure about that?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by easterner (June 17, 2009 9:20 pm ET)
         
      With everything going on outside the U.S. and the tug of war going on in the House,I would think positive media response is what the doctor ordered for these ailing economic times.Pres Obama can't do everything right but If were him I would take any positive kudos from any media outlet anyway I can.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jonesjax2374 (June 17, 2009 9:44 pm ET)
      4 1
      Maybe Obama is just more interesting and articulate and the people want to hear him and see his adorable family in these troubling times. Maybe he inherited a big mess of stupid and we WANT to hear his reassurances. Maybe the world is a bit crazy and we want to hear from an articulate president more. And he IS the first African-American Prez. Of COURSE he'll get more covers. As opposed to whom? Rush got a cover? Miss Deposed California? Who's working the hardest right now (that isn't hysterical) - Obama. Go Barack. Eric rocks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (June 17, 2009 10:13 pm ET)
      3 1
      Boehlert is right on the money. How is swatting a fly positive coverage? I thought it might demonstrate his fascist tendencies:) And the fact that Obama didn't get the Supreme Court to stop the vote count might help his favorability. The right thinks that any winning argument but theirs is PC.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seeryer (June 17, 2009 10:23 pm ET)
      4  
      I got to give Fox some credit here. They deserve it for having their biggest critic slam the hell out of their network's talking point.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pags2 (June 18, 2009 1:28 am ET)
      5 1
      The conservatives are not confused. They are trying to paint themselves as victims to generate a false impression on their audience, to wit, the left hates real Americans. This is the same tactic employed by Palin during the campaign. It may play well with the Fox News audience but it really shows how desperate the conservatives have become.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (June 18, 2009 3:50 am ET)
      3  
      I cannot stress how much contempt I have for Brent Bezel. The man is practically bozo the clown, and not only because of his name... he looks like one too. But in all seriousness, the guy runs a "media watch dog site" and his researchers cant seem to find the ability to watch the media even remotely well. His organization does a terrible job at it, and they try to be like MMfA and cant even get close to the stellar job it does. I'm sure all of you already know this... its old news and very obvious.

      I read an article on newsbusters the other day about Norah O’Donnell on MSNBC making a comment and laughing with Pat Buchanan (and another guest), and NB actually criticized her for what she said when she was clearly joking. I mean, come on. What an embarrassment.

      MRC even runs some kind of glorified award show convention that invites all the brain dead conservative media figures just to tear more into the "liberal media"... the likes of Mark Levin and other morons just give stupid speeches and give awards for, I'm assuming, bias and misinformation. I was surprised to see it even aired on C-Span. Unlike MRC, MMfA doesn’t need to do such things to get attention from its fans. They run a legitimate site with great researchers, and the conservative bias, which some people are afraid to document, is further exposed.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (June 18, 2009 8:03 am ET)
      1 5
      When the editor of the San Francisco Chronicle agrees with Bozell it just further highlights the idiocy of Boehlert and Media Matters.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (June 18, 2009 12:33 pm ET)
        1  
        Then you won't mind stopping your idiotic postings on here then right?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 18, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
        1  
        Because you, Cheney, are a big fan of the San Francisco Chronicle? Please explain.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by maddymort7289 (June 18, 2009 9:33 am ET)
      2 1
      The Pew study also noted another factor may be the media reflecting, and in turn, influencing public opinion. President Obama at this point in his presidency is more popular than were either Bush or Clinton. Past studies have shown a recurring pattern of press coverage tending to follow favorability ratings.

      Obama also entered office with a stronger popular mandate than either of his two predecessors. He is the first President since George H.W. Bush in 1988 to be elected to his first term with more than 50% of the popular vote. He also succeeded a president leaving office with historically low favorability ratings.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (June 18, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
      2  
      As I posted in a similar commentary... Fox News hypocrisy knows no bounds.. In January of 2008, they produced a documentary that was worse than what NBC did...

      "FOX News' Bret Baier was granted unprecedented access by George W. Bush as the president begins the final year of his extraordinarily consequential tenure."

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,324614,00.html

      They actually claimed to have "no holds barred" questions, but this is what we got!!!
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_bbXPrrxFY

      "There are some conservatives out there that say you are too much compassionate?"
      "Was your faith ever shaken over your 7 years?"
      "How badly do you want to get Osama Bin Laden before your end of office?"
      "If there is not another attack before you leave, will that be a major success for this administration?"
      "You've been a wartime president longer than Lincoln was, how do you think you have done?"
      "As you look back over this time, is there one thing that you are most proud of?"

      And the commentary between the interviews are even more lame:

      "From the beginning, President Bush has been frequently ridiculed for his speaking style, now 7 years later he is credited with some of the most eloquent and visionary speeches ever delivered by an American President."

      Please... Fox calling out ABC or NBC is just plain stupid.
      Report Abuse