Fox News' Briggs: "A great majority of this country -- maybe not majority" is against "nationalized health care"
June 20, 2009 1:43 pm ET
From the June 20th edition of Fox News Channel's Fox & Friends Saturday:


The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles|
|
||
![]() |
||
And these are the ones who tell us everyday what patriots they are, more so than everyone else.
OK, maybe not truth-telling, either.
"In general, would you favor or oppose a program that would increase the federal government's influence over the country's health care system in an attempt to lower costs and provide health care coverage to more Americans?" Americans favor government intervention in the health system by 69%-29%.
"In general, would you favor or oppose a program that would increase the federal government's influence over the health care you and your family receive in an attempt to lower costs and provide health care coverage to more Americans?" When it involves their own care and their families, approval is still high, but a bit lower: 63%-36%.
Then again, why should this surprise me -- these are the same people who thought the 22% {or less} who were die-hard Bush supporters constituted a "majority" . . .
Mr. News
Stop the madness...
These language experts have told them to always say "health care", whether in the context of "nationalized health care" or any other context: say "health care" always!
Even though it's all about HEALTH INSURANCE...
Would you like PUBLIC or NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE?
That's a plan whereby the 'for profit' private health insurance company has been eliminated, and along with eliminating them, you've eliminated the costs they naturally add to the equation, their costs of paying themselves and of owning the many fabulous practically skyscraper buildings they operate out of (and are always named after them), and the costs of all their travel and jets and company cars and of course their PROFIT, they always manage to squeeze out of the transaction a PROFIT for themselves...
To eliminate them and all their expenses and necessary PROFIT (and what do they do for anybody anyway, that they should PROFIT on your health care transaction), wouldn't that reduce costs to the Health Insurance buyer?
Public Health Insurance!
Call it "Nationalized Health Insurance" if you want!
But stop the madness, stop talking about "nationalized health care", that's their lie, that's what they say it's about... it's not, it's about Health Insurance.
- "global warming" into "climate change"
- "Iraqi civil war" into "sectarian violence"
- and "inheritance tax" into "death tax"
Actually, it was "estate tax", not inheritance.
Estate, of course, sounds like it only affects billionaires, so
As for terms mutating, I recall George Carlin
WW1: Shell Shock
WW2: Battle Fatigue
Vietnam-Iraq: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Bring it on, I like it!
Imagine, a not for profit health system where the practitioners of medicine can actually practice medicine because their focus was on your affliction and didn't see dollar signs with every procedure.
Regardless of your situation, you get the best care whether you're wealthy or homeless.
I think the wealthy and privileged are scared to be in the same place as the rest of us.
Some patriots. All they care about is short term profit and neat sound bites.
Rightwing dictator
How is it that those countries with nationalized health care spend less to cover everyone?
How is it that the public insurance option will cost more money to get less than those other countries have?
How is it? It's Fox, unbalanced to the point of insanity.
The obvious answer is that the rich disproprtionately gets better health care than the poor.
In 2004, the top 20% of this country owns 85% of its net worth.
This is why the World Health Organization ranks the US in 37th!!!
Behind Dominac and Costa Rica and just above Slovenia and Cuba.
They represent, speak to, and cajole, the white folk over 40 who make in excess of 100000 a year, the rest of us are here to do the work. Unfortunately, the stupid Democrats have given everybody a vote, whether they are Americans or not. Most to their way of thinking are not...
"Tell them what they want to hear". "The Demographic" is god. Truth is who is spending what, the rest is just noise. The hucksters they employ are judged on their ability to draw the dollar, whatever they might say is of no moment, and certainly should be of little concern to the vast mob of non-americans, off color, and poor. Their pulpit is the business of America is business, their fear is that they will, at some point, be dragged into the streets and butchered when all those non-Americans find out what they've been up to--
For them, it best to keep the pot stirred, and the fog thick.
Mr. News