About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Fox News' Briggs: "A great majority of this country -- maybe not majority" is against "nationalized health care"

June 20, 2009 1:43 pm ET

From the June 20th edition of Fox News Channel's Fox & Friends Saturday:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by overmars jr. (June 20, 2009 2:11 pm ET)
      6 1
      Bald-faced liars for cash.

      And these are the ones who tell us everyday what patriots they are, more so than everyone else.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 20, 2009 6:00 pm ET)
        7 1
        A great majority of Fox News staffers -- maybe not majority -- OK, maybe not any -- are patriotic, truth-telling Americans.

        OK, maybe not truth-telling, either.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (June 20, 2009 2:26 pm ET)
      6 1
      Not only are they bald-faced liars, they're still clueless as to the meaning of "majority":

      "In general, would you favor or oppose a program that would increase the federal government's influence over the country's health care system in an attempt to lower costs and provide health care coverage to more Americans?" Americans favor government intervention in the health system by 69%-29%.

      "In general, would you favor or oppose a program that would increase the federal government's influence over the health care you and your family receive in an attempt to lower costs and provide health care coverage to more Americans?" When it involves their own care and their families, approval is still high, but a bit lower: 63%-36%.



      Then again, why should this surprise me -- these are the same people who thought the 22% {or less} who were die-hard Bush supporters constituted a "majority" . . .

      Report Abuse
      • Author by overmars jr. (June 20, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
        7 1
        I think they mean the majority of people "who matter" - to them, of course.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rkcomments (June 20, 2009 2:35 pm ET)
      5 1
      I recognize the fat moron on the right, but who is the other idiot, the one who has trouble comprehending the meaning of the word 'majority'?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bad News (June 20, 2009 2:37 pm ET)
      5 1
      I want my public health care plan.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (June 20, 2009 2:54 pm ET)
      7 1

      Stop the madness...

      These language experts have told them to always say "health care", whether in the context of "nationalized health care" or any other context: say "health care" always!

      Even though it's all about HEALTH INSURANCE...

      Would you like PUBLIC or NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE?

      That's a plan whereby the 'for profit' private health insurance company has been eliminated, and along with eliminating them, you've eliminated the costs they naturally add to the equation, their costs of paying themselves and of owning the many fabulous practically skyscraper buildings they operate out of (and are always named after them), and the costs of all their travel and jets and company cars and of course their PROFIT, they always manage to squeeze out of the transaction a PROFIT for themselves...

      To eliminate them and all their expenses and necessary PROFIT (and what do they do for anybody anyway, that they should PROFIT on your health care transaction), wouldn't that reduce costs to the Health Insurance buyer?

      Public Health Insurance!

      Call it "Nationalized Health Insurance" if you want!

      But stop the madness, stop talking about "nationalized health care", that's their lie, that's what they say it's about... it's not, it's about Health Insurance.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (June 20, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
        3 2
        They're the same language experts who changed

        - "global warming" into "climate change"
        - "Iraqi civil war" into "sectarian violence"
        - and "inheritance tax" into "death tax"
        Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (June 20, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
          3 1
          mjh
          Actually, it was "estate tax", not inheritance.
          Estate, of course, sounds like it only affects billionaires, so

          As for terms mutating, I recall George Carlin
          WW1: Shell Shock
          WW2: Battle Fatigue
          Vietnam-Iraq: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by NdlovukaziThor (June 21, 2009 7:59 pm ET)
          1  
          And "suicide bombs" to homicide bombs".
          Report Abuse
    • Author by seroquel (June 20, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
      4 1
      I've actually read about these other countries have for their citizens.
      Bring it on, I like it!
      Imagine, a not for profit health system where the practitioners of medicine can actually practice medicine because their focus was on your affliction and didn't see dollar signs with every procedure.
      Regardless of your situation, you get the best care whether you're wealthy or homeless.
      I think the wealthy and privileged are scared to be in the same place as the rest of us.
      Some patriots. All they care about is short term profit and neat sound bites.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Daninhamden8165 (June 20, 2009 5:54 pm ET)
         
      Mr. Huckabee is such a sweet guy, I think I love him. He has my vote. Does anyone think he loves America?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbrantow (June 20, 2009 6:13 pm ET)
      3 1
      I guess Huckabee know's SO much that he should be deciding for all of us "know nothings". GOP arrogance is amazing. PS.....looks like huckabee went off that diet......maybe he's been frying squirrels in his popcorn popper again.
      Rightwing dictator
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Gibby2010 (June 21, 2009 12:08 am ET)
         
      Majority or not, nationalized health care is an absurd idea. Fact is...the majority of the USA is too stupid to understand what the upside or downside is. You all just blindly follow political parties. I used to think that the USA was full of morons. Last election removed all doubt.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (June 21, 2009 12:42 am ET)
      3  
      100% of the people who are against "nationalized health care" are against nationalized health care.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tjmccool2284 (June 21, 2009 5:11 am ET)
      3  
      How is it that a network devoted to cost, revenue, deficits and profits never mentions that the US spends more than other countries with nationalized health care?
      How is it that those countries with nationalized health care spend less to cover everyone?
      How is it that the public insurance option will cost more money to get less than those other countries have?
      How is it? It's Fox, unbalanced to the point of insanity.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (June 21, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
        1  
        Wow, what a great observation. Just what are the communication companies healthcare costs? Or they effecting the bottom line. YOU'D THINK the money-hungry, ratings obsessed board rooms would push a cost lowering program, but NOOOOOOOOOO! (as the late John Belushi used to say).
        Report Abuse
      • Author by blueline99 (June 22, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
           
        And to add to that... how is that we spend more money per person on health care (and by a lot... we're talking 20% more than #2 Luxemburgh and 40% more than #3 Switzerland) and have the 37th best health care in the world?

        The obvious answer is that the rich disproprtionately gets better health care than the poor.

        In 2004, the top 20% of this country owns 85% of its net worth.
        This is why the World Health Organization ranks the US in 37th!!!
        Behind Dominac and Costa Rica and just above Slovenia and Cuba.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Lute (June 21, 2009 11:06 am ET)
         
      It is perhaps incumbent upon us to realize just who it is they are talking about when they use the term, Americans---

      They represent, speak to, and cajole, the white folk over 40 who make in excess of 100000 a year, the rest of us are here to do the work. Unfortunately, the stupid Democrats have given everybody a vote, whether they are Americans or not. Most to their way of thinking are not...

      "Tell them what they want to hear". "The Demographic" is god. Truth is who is spending what, the rest is just noise. The hucksters they employ are judged on their ability to draw the dollar, whatever they might say is of no moment, and certainly should be of little concern to the vast mob of non-americans, off color, and poor. Their pulpit is the business of America is business, their fear is that they will, at some point, be dragged into the streets and butchered when all those non-Americans find out what they've been up to--

      For them, it best to keep the pot stirred, and the fog thick.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bad News (June 21, 2009 11:47 am ET)
         
      I would have sworn i heard 70% of Americans are for Nationalized health care.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AWiseChoice (June 21, 2009 12:45 pm ET)
         
      How long do these verbal proxy bullies think the majority will keep their patience before they get lynched for telling everyone they must suffer in lifelong pain and agony? There are people in the international collective that believe con men should be executed for crimes against humanity. The health care system in this country is a joke, where snake oil salesmen can sell poison to a healing doctor, who gives it to a patient, then the patient dies. Don't blame the doctors when the con men are health insurance execs and pharmaceutical execs.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by latanza (June 22, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
         
      Maybe the medical professionals who take 2 hours to see you, complete your exam in 15 minutes and bill for over 2000 dollars. They may be mad. Not the majority of the Americans I speak to, they got fed up with never seeing doctors participate in the human interest side of community affairs, give back to the community, or children, and they got tired of them talking down to them all the time not cooperating with what they wanted to include in their healthcare. THey talk at you and not to you and they have done nothing for common Americans outside of the office. They may have the support of legislative officials and other governmnet entities that monetarily benefitted from that past design but I doubt that the average American is complaining. If so, interview them!
      Report Abuse