Fox' Bolling on Obama proposals: "Free markets, RIP"; Gary Smith: "inching closer ... [to] old Soviet Union"
June 20, 2009 2:55 pm ET
From the June 20th edition of Fox News Channel's Bulls & Bears:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















Yeah I know exactly what this hack means... just this morning, I had to stand in a line that was a mile long, and I waited for three hours, just to buy a roll of toilet paper... and after seeing how long the line was for cheap worthless shoes, I said screw it, I'll go barefoot.
This regulatory reform, and the soviet America it's turning us into, has me wanting to defect.
CRAP! Here I was looking forward to the NEXT big economic meltdown & recession!
Great, way to go No-bama ...
What a stupid concept, and stupider people on our airwaves.
Can't we replace these morons with people who have no agenda?
I'm so sick of the lies, innuendo, and bias.
Since when did freedom of speech mean spewing propaganda or outright lying?
This network(Fox News) is doing a version of yelling fire in a crowded theater.
Since a Florida appeals court said so . . .
On the other hand, how else is the Faux News Channel supposed to remain on the air, if they're to be unreasonably restricted to actual news and truthful facts rather than their preferred recipe of willful lies and fanciful propaganda.
Jeez, but H L Mencken didn't know the half of it.
I think I'm going to need a hanky.
Now, if they would only start hanging themselves.....
No wait, I want to send them my medical and insurance bills so we can't let them leave just yet!
On a serious note, truly, what specific regulation or regulatory reform is it, that has these people so threatened that they think we're going soviet?
Seriously, force the discussion into a sharper image... make people state their fears and angst in specific detail...
Right this very moment I'm trying to think of some proposed financial regulation or regulatory reform that will impact me adversely, something that will make my life harder, unbearable even... something that bites into my paycheck or my savings...
My savings, or even my 401(k) account...
Are the proposed regulatory reforms going to impact my 401(k) adversely, or are they going to protect and even insure that type of savings?
These media hacks and their general vague fearmongering, it's all just the weaseling of salesmen and liars and thieves...
These media hacks, they should be specific and name a single proposed regulation or reform that's bad for the American People... or they should just shut up about it.
just WHAT is the similarity that caused them to make that comparison?
Is it gov't wiretapping of its own citizens without their knowledge or approval?
Is it consolidating power in a "Unitary Executive"?
Is it a military interventionist solution to every foreign policy matter?
If so, I'm inclined to agree -- but also to remind them, hey, ya got the wrong administration . . .
"This would be heck of a lot easier if this was a dictatorship, as long as I was the dictator" --George W Bush
We have regulated markets that oversee many things but unfortunately nobody wanted to end the party.
Does anyone know this mans travel plans?
Mr. News
Say it aint so. That is why we have these fraudulent companies, failed Savings and Loans, and these ficticious wars. We were broke and we needed some money. Don't talk smack because you may get smacked with the truth.
We don't need new regulation, we just need to repeal all the de-regulation that Bush did. There was a time that Banks did banking and were not allowed to do anything else.
Insurance companies did insurance and nothing else.
Brokerage firms traded stock and nothing else.
Our problem came when "innovators" and "schemers" took risks and decided that bundling mortgages into these derivates was a good idea. Then brokerage firms traded these derivatives. Then AIG needed a new "product" to sell and came up with insurance for these derivatives.
The problem was, nobody really understood how this all worked, and as long as housing values kept rising and interests rates were low, everybody made money and nobody cared.
But when the bubble burst, and brokerages and banks were leveraged 40-1, the house of cards came tumbling down.
Regulations that were in place 20 years ago would have prevented this all from happening. Going back to the rules of the 80's doesn't seem to be much like the Soviet Union