About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Quinn to "race-baiting" African-American "ingrates": "get on your knees" and "kiss the American dirt" because slavery brought them to U.S.

June 24, 2009 1:36 pm ET

From the June 24 edition of Clear Channel's The War Room with Quinn and Rose:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

See also: Pajama Media's The Senate Apologizes for Slavery and Jim Crow Laws - But Why?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (June 24, 2009 1:38 pm ET)
      3  
      Wow, lets not keep your racism in the closet shall we.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (June 24, 2009 3:30 pm ET)
        2  
        Hey, if it was good enough for Don Imus, its good enough for Quinn . . .
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (June 24, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
      3  
      Jim Quinn. Winning the African-American vote for the GOP, one "ingrate" at a time.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (June 24, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
        1  
        This, along with Rush Limpballs' disbelief at the existence of a black upper class that vacations at Martha's Vineyard, is all a part of that "big tent" the GOP is trying so hard to put up . . .
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (June 24, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
          2  
          Maybe they are trying, but they don't seem to care that there are guys like Quinn and Limbaugh running around it pulling the stakes up.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by budrykzp9226 (June 24, 2009 1:51 pm ET)
      3  
      "Get on your knees" and "kiss the American dirt"... is Quinn coming on to somebody? Sort of his rebound after Barney Frank wouldn't answer his drunk-dialed voicemails?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by preludecouple (June 24, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
      2  
      Did the republican party really end slavery? You wouldn't consider it the same party today would you.......?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by TheDayV (June 24, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
        2  
        Actually, for those unfamiliar with it, this is a little historical liability for the Democratic party that I'm surprised doesn't get exploited more often. The Democratic party, up until the time of Kennedy, had historically been the party of the south. However, when Kennedy began putting through legislation that benefited the civil rights movement, and later when Johnson finished off the process, the southern voters jumped ship and Nixon picked them up. Quinn's audience is dumb enough not to spot the context.

        Quinn spouts another historical inaccuaracy in the last minute. Slavery occurred as a result of popular racial conceptions that allowed for the commodification of a person. Those conceptions also allowed for the colonization of Africa. Anyone that's studied the history of Rwanda or Zimbabwe or even Africa would know that, were it not for for the conceptions that produced slavery, the Rwandan genocide, the present mess that is Zimbabwe, and many of the other problems that plague modern Africa would most likely have never occurred.

        Quinn insults the intelligence of his audience with that entire diatribe.

        Or does he?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by robyn20094113 (June 24, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
          1  
          First they have to have intelligence to be insulted.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by tomfodw (June 25, 2009 1:09 pm ET)
          1  
          Actually, blacks started voting for the Democrats after the 1932 presidential election (those blacks who were permitted to vote, of course). This trend accelerated following the second world war, when blacks began to emigrate north to the industrial cities, and was cemented by the civil rights acts of the 1960s (the 1964 and 1965 civil rights bills actually received more Republican votes in Congress than Democratic - the Democratic Party was still dominant in the south, which did not change until Nixon's 1972 re-election).
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jlw7717595 (June 24, 2009 2:51 pm ET)
        1  
        What these ignorant people don't realize is that with slavery and civil rights it was not a Republican/Democrat issue. It was a Liberal/Conservative issue. If you wanna get even more in depth you can argue that the United States had no anti-slavery party. Even the Republicans with Lincoln as their leader only called for an end to slavery's expansion not its immediate end in the South. Many Republicans also were once members of the nativist/anti-immigrant American Party or Know-Nothings as they liked to be called. There were anti-slavery Dems in the South and many in the North (including Stephen Douglas who advocated popular sovereignty which could have ended slavery in the territories by a vote) in the 1850's although I do not have statistics in front of me right now. Except for the abolitionists, no movement was calling for an end to slavery when the Civil War started. Lincoln was pushed to end slavery after events forced his hand. That is not to say Lincoln dreamed of a day when slavery ended, but saying he was an abolitionists and thumping their chest today is an example of gross historical ignorance. Same with Civil Rights. Lyndon Johnson caught flack from Conservative or southern Dems when he signed the Civil Rights and Voting Rights act in the 1960's. It was a liberal/conservative issue, not Democrat Republicans. Liberals supported Civil Rights while conservatives from both parties were against it. In the 1970's the Republicans played on the racial antagonisms of Civil Rights (the southern strategy) to garner the southern vote, where it stays today.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bilbo_dies (June 24, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
      2  
      Gee, I don't know if there are any more lines to cross after this comment. I suppose we don't need to ask him if he is a white supremicist.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtdavis11200 (June 24, 2009 2:29 pm ET)
      1  
      Quinn should study the history of slavery before he starts running his mouth.

      Slavery never truly ended in all parts of the United States until 1964 when Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act enforcing the equal access and treatment provision for all Americans. Including Africa-Americans in the the South.

      Quinn does not mention that after the Emancipation Proclamation Act was signed into law in the late 1800's how the South continued to arrest African- Americans on bogus charges and sold them for money to coal miners and farmers to help rebuild areas of the South devastated after their defeat during the Civil War.

      This belief in the South and some parts of the North from the 1600's -1965 that African- Americans were free but not equal to whites caused much bloodshed and pain to a group of American citizens that could not count on their goverment to protect them.In our nations history other than Native-Americans no group of Americans were treated more harshly.


      Quinn like many others from the right should educate themslves on the history of slavery before they comment to their listners about a very serious and sensitive time in Amercan history that can never be erased.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by kfraz43 (June 24, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
      3  
      Wouldn't it be great if these clowns were held accountable for the stuff they say?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sikvod00 (June 24, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
      1  
      Oh, Lord. Not this tired dribble. I suppose AAs should really be angry at early abolitiionists who wanted to end the slave trade and grateful to slaveowners.

      While most sentient beings will see this for the gawd awful mess of logic that it is, it isn't uncommon to hear racists and closet racists (not anymore!) expouse such nonsense. I've also heard people use similar "logic" to justify U.S. intervention in South American countries like Chile.

      Yes, the unintended consequence of slavery was that current day blacks have the priviledge of living in the U.S. instead of possibily living in the more impoverished regions of Africa (hmm, how did they get that way? Must be a lack of personal responsibility from the natives!! They have no one else to blame, right?). The problem is...you bet...it was an UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE!

      Slaves were not brought here so that they could reap the fruits of American prosperity and take part in civilized society. They were forcibly brought here, torn apart from their families, treated like property, and worked so that others could prosper at their expense. The fact that AAs live here now is irrelevant. Slavery was one of this countrie's first evils, and blacks and everyone else are justified in being mortified over it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by robyn20094113 (June 24, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
        1  
        I guess the impoverished Blacks in Africa is do to the liberal welfare plan that makes them lazy, keeps them down, you know the free lunches, free health-care, free schooling, is Africa spoiling their Black citizens like the U.S. is? He makes bile rise up in my mouth. Sometimes I think conservatives have not heard yet, that African Americans can now vote. They sure are not out to win any of those votes.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (June 24, 2009 5:24 pm ET)
      1  
      More ignorant BS from a lessor faunt of missimformation.
      I'd consider giving him something to kiss. Though it being inanimate and thereby unresponsive to lips, there would be little pleasure involved.
      But I really don't swing that way.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (June 24, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
        1  
        Quinney is a Sexual Harrasser and a racist.
        His listeners are TrailerTrash Republicans who couldn't think their way out of a teacup.
        He is reading this from some website..he cannot think. He hasn't had an original thought in years. The idiots that listen to him think he speaks from the heart.
        Quinney is a little man who is cowardly when it comes to confrontation. Quinney, why not take phone calls from LIBS for one straight hour? Reason you won't..you are a coward and just to dumb.

        Go harrass some feloow worker...Rosie needs it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by robyn20094113 (June 24, 2009 5:56 pm ET)
          1  
          Hey stop insulting Trailer Trash..some of my best friends............
          Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (June 24, 2009 9:00 pm ET)
            1  
            Sorry, you are right..I called the Trailer Trash, Republicans..that is an insult. I also have friends in trailers..double-wides
            Report Abuse
    • Author by mescal (June 25, 2009 1:45 am ET)
      1  
      Quinn is ignorant, racist scum.
      Report Abuse