Rep. Frank explains to O'Reilly his record of support for renters, opposition to universal homeownership
June 24, 2009 9:12 pm ET


The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles|
|
||
![]() |
||
Ted's quoting the crap from Wall Street Journal Op-eds and Barney is just whoopin' his ass.
But I would still love to hear your idea of the personal attacks. Perhaps that is just your fantasizing.
What does Olbermann have to do with this thread? Why are you reich-wing terrorist teabaggers so obsessed with Olbermann?
I'm sure someone out there has compiled a list of all the shutups, cut the mikes, I'm gonna beat you up if you don't get out of my studios, you're a cowards, etc. that O'Reilly has spewed in the course of his oh-so-illustrious career... perhaps I should find it and post it.
Yeah, that's right, I called you a fool. You should be grateful that I restrained myself.
Leave it up to a troll like you to deny reality and make a personal attack on me after I complain about personal attacks, and assume that my knowledge is limited to this clip and that I am fantasizing.
And you are fantasizing, you can not point to even one, yet you mentioned "personal attacks" . What a fraud.
They are there. But you're a liar, so you claim that since I wouldn't spoon-feed you, that proves they aren't there?
It's not that I "can not even point to one." It's that I will not, and I explained that above. How ignorant must you be if you couldn't even understand it after reading my comment?
And you need to stop looking in a mirror when you have a keyboard handy, because your projection about who's being a fraud is clearly present here.
Perhaps you will find Barney's own words on home ownership interesting. He like to make up stories also. .http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iW5qKYfqALE
Do you ever make sense? I didn't think so.
Here is what Frank said back then. .''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/11/business/new-agency-proposed-to-oversee-freddie-mac-and-fannie-mae.html?sec=&spon=&&scp=3&sq=%202003%20fannie%20freddie%20labaton&st=cse
You should check you recollection of the history.
However, I am having a great deal of trouble seeing how you can reconcile your (frankly odd) blame of Barney Frank - despite his being in the minority at the time - for the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac meltdown. By your reasoning, wouldn't the blame for the Gramm-Leach-Blily Act passage be Phil Gramm's fault and not Bill Clinton? After all, Gramm introduced the bill. You can't possibly blame the President according to your reasoning. Can you?
You seem to go out of your way to extricate Bush from any culpability (despite him being in charge for the last 8 years), but you so easily lay all the blame for the repeal of Glass-Steagall on Clinton's feet.
I do not think your position is a rational one. You are trying to have it both ways.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were a very small part of the financial crisis.
This Administration will constantly strive to promote an ownership society in America. We want more people owning their own home. It is in our national interest that more people own their own home. After all, if you own your own home, you have a vital stake in the future of our country.”
- President George W. Bush, December 16, 2003
“The Accomplishments"
Increasing Homeownership
* The US homeownership rate reached a record 69.2 percent in the second quarter of 2004. The number of homeowners in the United States reached 73.4 million, the most ever. And for the first time, the majority of minority Americans own their own homes.
* The President set a goal to increase the number of minority homeowners by 5.5 million families by the end of the decade. Through his homeownership challenge, the President called on the private sector to help in this effort. More than two dozen companies and organizations have made commitments to increase minority homeownership - including pledges to provide more than $1.1 trillion in mortgage purchases for minority homebuyers this decade.
* President Bush signed the $200 million-per-year American Dream Downpayment Act which will help approximately 40,000 families each year with their downpayment and closing costs.
* The Administration proposed the Zero-Downpayment Initiative to allow the Federal Housing Administration to insure mortgages for first-time homebuyers without a downpayment. Projections indicate this could generate over 150,000 new homeowners in the first year alone.
* President Bush proposed a new Single Family Affordable Housing Tax Credit to increase the supply of affordable homes.
* The President has proposed to more than double funding for the Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP), where government and non-profit organizations work closely together to increase homeownership opportunities.
* The President proposed $2.7 billion in USDA home loan guarantees to support rural homeownership and $1.1 billion in direct loans for low-income borrowers unable to secure a mortgage through a conventional lender. These loans are expected to provide 42,800 homeownership opportunities to rural families across America.”
Source(s):
“President George W. Bush - Record of Achievement - Chapter 7 - Expanding Home Ownership”
http://www.whitehouse.gov/ infocus/ achievement/ chap7.html
Frank and Freddie
CLASSY !!!!!!!
Mr. News
And there is no reason to "sign" your posts with the same name that shows up in the headers. It points out that you have no clue how this site works.
He proposed affordable housing tax incentives. He insisted that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac meet ambitious new goals for low-income lending.
Concerned that down payments were a barrier, Mr. Bush persuaded Congress to spend up to $200 million a year to help first-time buyers with down payments and closing costs.
And he pushed to allow first-time buyers to qualify for federally insured mortgages with no money down
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/business/21admin.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis
Subprime lending offered high-cost loans to the weakest borrowers during the housing boom that lasted from 2001 to 2007.
Subprime lending was at its height from 2004 to 2006.
Federal Reserve Board data show that:
More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions.
Private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year.
Only one of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006 was directly subject to the housing law that's being lambasted by conservative critics.
Fannie, the Federal National Mortgage Association, and Freddie, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., don't lend money, to minorities or anyone else, however. They purchase loans from the private lenders who actually underwrite the loans.
It's a process called securitization, and by passing on the loans, banks have more capital on hand so they can lend even more.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/53802.html
Both parties had a hand in this financial mess. I believe Barney, Dodd and some of the other dems pushed harder for unqualified people to get mortages and screamed loudest when any warnings were raised about the potential crisis ahead. The media's unwillingness to report the potential crisis and politicians (including Bush and rep) more worried about the short term economic numbers, don't scare people and hurt the market, all contributes to the mess we're in.
The financial market institution is oppressive, you replaced slavery with it!