About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Limbaugh: When Obama talks of empathy, he means "I want ... racists and bigots" on the Court

June 25, 2009 3:19 pm ET

From the June 25 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously: Rush reacts to Newt's backtracking on Sotomayor "racist" charge: "I'm not retracting it."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 25, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
      5  
      It's amazing how true this guy's statements are, provided you change them to mean the EXACT OPPOSITE of what he says.

      Check it out:

      Limbaugh: When Obama talks of empathy, he means "I want ... racists and bigots" off the Court

      Doesn't thatsound reasonable? It's unccanny.

      He's a despicable excuse for a human being, and so is every moron that laps up every word he vomits out.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pros2pros2940 (June 25, 2009 3:43 pm ET)
      5  
      Too late fat boy, they're already on the court
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (June 25, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
        3  
        Too late fat boy, they're already on the court

        In the form of Antonin Scalia and Clarence "Poop for Brains" Thomas.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by deeznuts (June 25, 2009 6:29 pm ET)
          2  
          And Roberts.
          And Alito.

          But yeah, Scalia is the worst.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by LuvLuLu (June 25, 2009 9:40 pm ET)
          2  
          Clarence Thomas had a doozy today, in an 8-1 decision where he thought it was okay to do a strip-search of a young school-aged girl for Ibuprofen because she didn't have to strip naked. She only had to strip to her bra and panties, and then she had to pull out the elastic on her bra and panties. Not a strip-search. Not unconstitutional, according to Thomas.

          MMfA asked what does Thomas have to do to get labeled as "out of the mainstream", like conservatives have labeled Sotomayor.

          I bet this won't do it, although he clearly is out of the mainstream of human beings.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by budrykzp9226 (June 25, 2009 10:52 pm ET)
            1  
            Thomas misread. He thought they were searching her for Diet Coke.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (June 25, 2009 3:53 pm ET)
      3  
      Obama wants to put right wing republicans on the court? I thought he was supposed to be the most liberal president ever?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by o rly (June 25, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
      4  
      No no, Rush, that's who YOU want on the court.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (June 25, 2009 5:23 pm ET)
        4  
        It's incredible how much of Boss Hogg's show is built on telling his dittozombies what everybody "really means", regardless of how far his interpretation is from what the person actually said.

        One of the primary reasons I listen whenever I have the chance. It's hilarious to hear his callers debate and analyze Rush's strawmen as if they actually exist.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by deeznuts (June 25, 2009 6:40 pm ET)
          3  
          I'll admit that's the only reason I listen too. The echo chamber is rather sad and amusing at the same time.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Bad News (June 25, 2009 5:03 pm ET)
      2  
      Less chatter, more facts please.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rkcomments (June 25, 2009 9:08 pm ET)
      3  
      And if Obama talks of Limbaugh on the court he actually means that he wants a fat drug addicted impotent PIG on the bench.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by solon (June 25, 2009 9:28 pm ET)
      2  
      As soon as Rush opens his mouth he is saying that he is going to lie and spew the most outrageously stupid talking points then smirk because his brainwashed Limborg hiveminders will eat it up as if it was somehow connected to reality
      Report Abuse
    • Author by latanza (June 26, 2009 10:03 am ET)
         
      And the airwaves are left to you Rush!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NdlovukaziThor (June 26, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
      2  
      Why? Why do they keep associating empathy with sympathy? They are not the same thing. You can have empathy for someone like Madoff, though just about no one would feel sympathetic towards him. You can feel sympathy for someone without being empathetic.

      I am just continually amazed and frustrated at how those like Rush attempt to rewrite the dictionary.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by robyn20094113 (June 27, 2009 4:01 am ET)
        2  
        attempt to rewrite the dictionary. And the Constitution and The Declaration Of Independence.
        Report Abuse