About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Olbermann awards Milbank "Best False Equivalency" for comparing Pitney to Gannon

June 29, 2009 9:11 pm ET

From the June 29th edition of MSNBC's Countdown With Keith Olbermann:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by LuvLuLu (June 29, 2009 10:49 pm ET)
      4  
      At the end he even seemed to express sorrow that Dana is acting this way.

      Me too.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fortunaterays7567 (June 29, 2009 11:44 pm ET)
         
      Is there any difference between Olbermans's "Best Persons" and "Worst Persons"?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (June 30, 2009 12:19 pm ET)
           
        anymore, i think Best Persons are the 4th and 5th worst persons....at least thats how i see it
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (June 30, 2009 2:26 am ET)
        2  
        You, obviously.

        After all, if you didn't care what Olbermann had to say, then why would you bother to post about it?

        Now, O'Lielly's waiting for his dry cleaning. Time to get back to work, Fauxliberal.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (June 30, 2009 2:50 am ET)
        3  
        A whole lot more than care what idiots like YOU say.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (June 30, 2009 7:56 am ET)
        3  
        Who cares what the bathtub boy says. (sic)
        Oooooooooooh, a derisive nickname made by using a random object found in a bathroom. Now that's rhetoric to be proud of.

        From now on, you are the "commode boy." It's only fair to use your own debating tactics against you since you seem to think they're perfectly valid. Sauce for the goose, etc.

        By the way, questions such as yours are still ended with question marks, and not periods. That's why they're called "question marks." I'm not surprised you don't know this, commode boy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by thejbomb65 (June 30, 2009 9:26 am ET)
        2  
        is that all you have?

        an old john gibson remark?

        wait didnt Gibson get booted from tv for being a racist pig?

        and lets not forget good ol Michael Weiner (Savage) and his getting kicked off of tv for his remarks. and he wonders why he is banned from Britain.....go figure.

        of course you wouldn't care about any of that and let something like those slide, and support guys like Boss Limbaugh (its funny when racists get to call other people racists), adulters like McCain, and now Sanford, and Ensign, and Vitter (of course they should be forgiven no matter what they do but those darn Democrats, should be strung up for committing such sins)

        good luck in trying to make yourself credible.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fairliberal (June 30, 2009 10:46 am ET)
            2
          You forgot to mention all of the dems involved in corruption, you know like Dodd , Rangel, Jefferson, and now the guilty plea by Monica Conyers. I guess you deem infidelity a more serious matter than corruption.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by thejbomb65 (June 30, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
            1  
            the issue IS adultery. if it was corruption i would have said as much. swing and a miss yet again.

            in this particular instance being that i was speaking of adultery. and speaking to the fact that the republican party so fervently states that it is the party of family values, yet the above mentioned men seem to have been willing to shelve such. now im not saying that democrats are any less guilty, i mean perfect example, bill clinton. but i think the republican party should stop saying how they are the party of such family values, because its hypocritical.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by thejbomb65 (June 30, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
            1  
            now, since you wanna change the subject to corruption i will indulge you.

            sure there are plenty of democratic party members guilty of such things, aside from those you have mentioned, there is also william jefferson, the guy who got busted with 90k in a meat freezer.

            but don't make it sound as if only the republicans are free of corruption. because that is false, and you damn well know it.

            a perfect example three senators back in december were crying about the auto bailout.......Shelby, Corker, and i believe Graham, all just happened to have fought hard to get tax breaks for foreign car companies to put plants in their states, and those companies contributed to their campaigns.

            now im sure there are plenty of examples on both sides.

            but again dont make it sound like its on the democrats that are guilty of corruption. because both are.

            again a nice try but yet again, a swing and miss
            Report Abuse
    • Author by grodge (June 30, 2009 6:21 am ET)
         
      Dana must protect the media elite, after all. How dare someone without the proper bona fides take part in HIS journalism... besides where's Mr. Pitney's satin smoking jacket?
      Report Abuse