Boortz: "global warming scam" is "an effort by the left to destroy capitalist economies"
July 02, 2009 1:31 pm ET
From the July 2 edition of Cox Radio's The Neil Boortz Program:


Media Matters: The right-wing media's election analysis just ain't that good
The Friday Rush: For conservatives, $400 million buys defeat at the ballot box
The myth of Fox News' ratings spike|
|
||
![]() |
||
People who have dedicated their lives in truth in science.
The data has been peer reviewed throughout the world... their findings are apolitical.
You are acting like the left created Global Warming in some diabolical scheme. Global Warming is the result of science.
Neal is quoting organizations of scientists that have been created with a political purpose. Just like you Neal, you have an agenda.
I personally don't have an agenda. If the scientific community agrees that climate change / global warming is real and a danger to us all, I will believe them.
The Science and Environmental Policy Project is an organization that was created in 1990 specifically to "debunk" global warning... they have an agenda and any scientific results from them are suspect.
The right is always quick to criticize the Michael Moore's of the world who have an agenda... then put together a documentary with evidence to support that agenda...
Well guess what... that book you are reading... is the Right's version of a Michael Moore documentary... enjoy the reading, I doubt there will be anything in that book that you will disagree with.
All the other half needs is a couple of regular Joes on the TV noticing that there's a Global Warming conference in December in the northern part of the states... and it's snowing!
The science guys don't stand a chance with them.
Nope... it's just an effort to save "capitalist economies" from their inherent destructive selves.
Kinda like government regulations only purpose is to save the so-called free market from destroying itself.
But then, for a simpleton like Neal Boortz, this seems to be to hard to understand...
America we need to pay attention.....
One would have thought he would have used the "scientific facts" in the 800 page document and try and support his side.
And then he goes on to say that global warming is taught at schools and all of this stuff.
A.) I have never been taught about global warming in school.
and
B.) Are these not the same people that are trying to get creationism taught in public schools?