Limbaugh guest host Belling: Obama is a "Marxist," "what we're seeing here is the total embrace of socialism in our country"
July 06, 2009 3:39 pm ET
From the July 6th edition of Premiere Radio Networks' Rush Limbaugh Show:


Media Matters: The right-wing media's election analysis just ain't that good
The Friday Rush: For conservatives, $400 million buys defeat at the ballot box
The myth of Fox News' ratings spike|
|
||
![]() |
||
Didn't work for her and exposes you as an idiot
I'm waiting for them to bring back "anarchist" as a label, and then fret about fluoridated water. It's bound to happen.
Doesn't this show how off-the-wall Belling's demented, ugly, screeching hysteria really is? Why he has any audience at all is the real question.
These people don't even know what socialism is; they can't offer a clear explanation of what it is we're supposed to be so terrified of.
This guy obviously has been coached (ordered?) to say outrageous things while Rush is on vacation.
And God knows Rush has set the "outrageous" bar pretty high for his substitute hosts.
Randy
So the government playing the stock market is socialism?
is not even funny?!
He is not interested in discussion and his opinions are pure
propaganda - loud and stupid aimed towards destruction and never
searching for truth or solutions.
The reason I bring this up is because, maybe if you're Mr. Belling as opposed to Mr. Carlin, the censors provide you with a list of words you -must- say on radio and TV. Words like Marxist, socialist, attack, free enterprise, etc. ad nauseum. Or, maybe there really is a secret government facility where they turn out these interchangeable tools: Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, Rove, and of course Belling.
Because I can do it for a lot less. And because it's radio, you won't see me holding my nose while I do it.
Gee, maybe that's why this administration could be called socialist and our president a marxist. Again, I would ask others here to define him politically or otherwise debate.
Try again. Fool.
[From The Audacity of Hope (2006), by Barack Obama, p. 188.]
We have -not- nationalized the banking industry. All the banks of the U.S. are not run by a central bank under the direction of the Secretary of the Treasury. 99% of banks in the U.S. are still privately and/or publicly owned. Same goes for the auto industry. Controlling interest in GM? At the moment, yes, but what about Ford? Still publicly owned. U.S. government has no share, and that doesn't touch all the little independent car companies, or Chrysler who is owned by Fiat.
President Obama is a member of the Democratic Party. Marxism and socialism are not the same thing. Feel free to consult a dictionary from time to time. As far as I can discover, there doesn't seem to b e a 'democratic socialists of america' party, except in the minds of conservative media figures. As for his foreign policy, please provide the name of one country led by a Marxist that Obama has aided. Just one.
There! You now have many choices to respond to and debate. Remember that you were the one who wanted a debate, so, let's go easy on the name calling, okay?
And don't ask him anything that his blithering idiot radio yakkers don't try to answer, because that's his only source of information.
God only knows to what you're referring here, but for someone who is so utterly concerned about individual liberties, you seem awfully complacent about illegal spying here in the good 'ol USA, or for that matter the previous president's criminal use of the executive branch. But when a president you don't like comes to power, people like you suddenly become fierce watchdogs of "the peoples rights".
Let's be real here, what you don't like are policies that are constitutional and that the majority of Americans voted for. You are unhappy with the results of a democratic election. There's nothing wrong with that. All I ask is that right wingers don't use pretend outrage about our constitutional liberties as a cover for their displeasure with what the people have decided. Its quite irritating.