About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Juan Williams: Sotomayor's "wise Latina" comment was "racist"

July 13, 2009 8:27 am ET

From Fox News' July 12 special, Fox News Reporting: Judging Sotomayor:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Williams says Sotomayor's "wise Latina" comment is "not radical," but similar to Alito's comments

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by epkklk851 (July 13, 2009 8:46 am ET)
      2  
      I wonder, listening to this, if Mr. Williams thinks this will get him invited into a nicer group of people. He essentially reinforced everything that I took away from Judge Sotomayor's notorious statement while at the same time talking trash about her! Is this self-loathing, or the willingness to sacrifice one's own dignity for the sake of a career? I'm afraid that, were I in Mr. Williams position, I would have trouble sleeping at night and looking at my self in the mirror. And the irony is, no matter how much he apologizes, he will never be forgiven for being a minority by some members of the Conservative movement. For the world, Mr. Williams, but for Fox News?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (July 13, 2009 10:57 am ET)
        2  
        He said that he felt her oft quoted remark "was racial, if not racist" and he was asked onto to Fox to make that statement. What does he hope to gain from his prefacing remarks? Yes, he agrees with her, but he still has to trot out the "r-word" to give his remarks credibility. I could not sit there on the stage and say, as a woman, that those remarks were sexist, nor do I believe they were racist. I wonder how Mr. Williams differs from me that he could as a minority, since he clearly agrees with what she meant if not with how she said it. There are some groups that I would not want to be associated with, if the price of even second class admission is to apologize for the group's policies or to compromise my principles or dignity.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 10:36 am ET)
          2
        Please point out what he said that troubles you so much. He said she was qualified, and would be a benefit to the bench. When you listen to the whole statement, what is the problem? Are you simply troubled by the fact that an AA does not share you view, so he must be self-loathing?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by skiploader1111 (July 13, 2009 11:36 am ET)
          2  
          Apparently, you think that Sotomayor's "infamous" statement was racist. You would be right if her statement was racist, but it was not. MMFA has debunked that smear.
          http://mediamatters.org/research/200905270005
          She never said that Latinas make better judges or justices than white males. ANYTIME a conservative talks host or commentator talks about the statement, they make every effort possible to not mention any other part of the speech before or after the "infamous" sentance, because doing so would impede their ability to lie to the public.

          As for Williams, he has already said that her statement was not radical, that she was not saying that women were better than men, and that the statement similar to statement Samuel Alito said in his confirmation hearings. All true. To come to that conclusion Williams would have had to read more of Sotomayor's speech.

          Now he has decided to say that she is claiming to be "endowed in a much better superior way than white people. That's a racist statement. She's qualified and all, but she can't get away from that."
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
              2
            If you believe that MM has "debunked" it then fine. That does not mean someone is wrong if they either still question it, or want to hear her explain it during the hearings.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 13, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
              1  
              If you believe MMfA hasn't "debunked" it, then you are in severe need of a remedial English class.

              Because Sotomayor never said what you claimed she did multiple times, and you haven't been able to understand when just as many times that has been explained to you.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by skiploader1111 (July 13, 2009 2:06 pm ET)
                 
              I am all for Sotomayor answering those questions at the hearings, again. And AGAIN if you like. I don't know what gave you the idea that anyone here wanted otherwise.

              It still doesn't change the fact that conservative commentators avoid every other word in her speeches other than those 32 "infamous" words.

              I am glad that you have come around on this one issue though.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by skiploader1111 (July 13, 2009 2:07 pm ET)
                   
                Scratch my last sentence. You haven't come around yet.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by skiploader1111 (July 13, 2009 11:47 am ET)
          2  
          Here is more of Sotomayor's speech that some at Fox News don't to appear on Fox News:

          "Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences, a possibility I abhor less or discount less than my colleague Judge Cedarbaum, our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging. Justice O'Connor has often been cited as saying that a wise old man and wise old woman will reach the same conclusion in deciding cases. I am not so sure Justice O'Connor is the author of that line since Professor Resnik attributes that line to Supreme Court Justice Coyle. I am also not so sure that I agree with the statement. First, as Professor Martha Minnow has noted, there can never be a universal definition of wise. Second, I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.

          Let us not forget that wise men like Oliver Wendell Holmes and Justice Cardozo voted on cases which upheld both sex and race discrimination in our society. Until 1972, no Supreme Court case ever upheld the claim of a woman in a gender discrimination case. I, like Professor Carter, believe that we should not be so myopic as to believe that others of different experiences or backgrounds are incapable of understanding the values and needs of people from a different group. Many are so capable. As Judge Cedarbaum pointed out to me, nine white men on the Supreme Court in the past have done so on many occasions and on many issues including Brown."

          Brown refers to one of the most important SCOTUS cases ever, Brown v. Board of Education.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by RABBITLUVR (July 13, 2009 10:43 am ET)
      1  
      Mr. Williams, you're a tool.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (July 13, 2009 11:03 am ET)
      3  
      Mr. Williams, why don't you actually read the entire speech and put it into the context of the speech.

      If they would all read the entire speech, then they would fully understand what she was trying to say... she wasn't saying that she is better, just that because the Supreme Court has been made of 99% white men, her perspective as a Female Latina will be different. Not inherently better because she is a female Latina, but better because she is not a white male.

      Read the entire speech before you start throwing out terms like racist.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (July 13, 2009 11:05 am ET)
         
      Mr. Williams, why don't you actually read the entire speech and put it into the context of the speech.

      If they would all read the entire speech, then they would fully understand what she was trying to say... she wasn't saying that she is better, just that because the Supreme Court has been made of 99% white men, her perspective as a Female Latina will be different. Not inherently better because she is a female Latina, but better because she is not a white male.

      Read the entire speech before you start throwing out terms like racist.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (July 13, 2009 11:46 am ET)
        1  
        There's no way in hell anybody in the news media does not know the context of that statement by now. Williams is clearly taking a partisan stance. What bothers me more is that non-partisan and even liberal media figures refuse to correct these lies.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (July 13, 2009 11:06 am ET)
         
      Mr. Williams, why don't you actually read the entire speech and put it into the context of the speech.

      If they would all read the entire speech, then they would fully understand what she was trying to say... she wasn't saying that she is better, just that because the Supreme Court has been made of 99% white men, her perspective as a Female Latina will be different. Not inherently better because she is a female Latina, but better because she is not a white male.

      Read the entire speech before you start throwing out terms like racist.
      Report Abuse