Juan Williams: Sotomayor's "wise Latina" comment was "racist"
July 13, 2009 8:27 am ET
From Fox News' July 12 special, Fox News Reporting: Judging Sotomayor:


The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles|
|
||
![]() |
||
http://mediamatters.org/research/200905270005
She never said that Latinas make better judges or justices than white males. ANYTIME a conservative talks host or commentator talks about the statement, they make every effort possible to not mention any other part of the speech before or after the "infamous" sentance, because doing so would impede their ability to lie to the public.
As for Williams, he has already said that her statement was not radical, that she was not saying that women were better than men, and that the statement similar to statement Samuel Alito said in his confirmation hearings. All true. To come to that conclusion Williams would have had to read more of Sotomayor's speech.
Now he has decided to say that she is claiming to be "endowed in a much better superior way than white people. That's a racist statement. She's qualified and all, but she can't get away from that."
Because Sotomayor never said what you claimed she did multiple times, and you haven't been able to understand when just as many times that has been explained to you.
It still doesn't change the fact that conservative commentators avoid every other word in her speeches other than those 32 "infamous" words.
I am glad that you have come around on this one issue though.
"Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences, a possibility I abhor less or discount less than my colleague Judge Cedarbaum, our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging. Justice O'Connor has often been cited as saying that a wise old man and wise old woman will reach the same conclusion in deciding cases. I am not so sure Justice O'Connor is the author of that line since Professor Resnik attributes that line to Supreme Court Justice Coyle. I am also not so sure that I agree with the statement. First, as Professor Martha Minnow has noted, there can never be a universal definition of wise. Second, I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life.
Let us not forget that wise men like Oliver Wendell Holmes and Justice Cardozo voted on cases which upheld both sex and race discrimination in our society. Until 1972, no Supreme Court case ever upheld the claim of a woman in a gender discrimination case. I, like Professor Carter, believe that we should not be so myopic as to believe that others of different experiences or backgrounds are incapable of understanding the values and needs of people from a different group. Many are so capable. As Judge Cedarbaum pointed out to me, nine white men on the Supreme Court in the past have done so on many occasions and on many issues including Brown."
Brown refers to one of the most important SCOTUS cases ever, Brown v. Board of Education.
If they would all read the entire speech, then they would fully understand what she was trying to say... she wasn't saying that she is better, just that because the Supreme Court has been made of 99% white men, her perspective as a Female Latina will be different. Not inherently better because she is a female Latina, but better because she is not a white male.
Read the entire speech before you start throwing out terms like racist.
If they would all read the entire speech, then they would fully understand what she was trying to say... she wasn't saying that she is better, just that because the Supreme Court has been made of 99% white men, her perspective as a Female Latina will be different. Not inherently better because she is a female Latina, but better because she is not a white male.
Read the entire speech before you start throwing out terms like racist.
If they would all read the entire speech, then they would fully understand what she was trying to say... she wasn't saying that she is better, just that because the Supreme Court has been made of 99% white men, her perspective as a Female Latina will be different. Not inherently better because she is a female Latina, but better because she is not a white male.
Read the entire speech before you start throwing out terms like racist.