About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Buchanan: "Todd Palin ought to take Levi down to the creek and hold his head underwater until the thrashing stops"

July 13, 2009 9:34 am ET

From the July 13 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 13, 2009 9:38 am ET)
      6 1
      Amazing. Simply amazing. The way to deal with a family-political-media dispute is to MURDER HIM.

      Do these idiots even listen to themselves?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 10:16 am ET)
          15
        Edwin

        It was a joke you idiot. Lighten up.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (July 13, 2009 10:17 am ET)
          8 1
          Umm, no, it wasn't.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 10:21 am ET)
              15
            Ok,,,,so you are realllyyyyyyyyy going to tell me that Pat was serious, and advocating murder on live tv? You are dumber than I thought!!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (July 13, 2009 10:26 am ET)
              12 1
              Did I say that?

              No, I did not. Apparently, someone can't comprehend the words on the screen.

              Do I think Pat is advocating murder? No, probably not, but one has to be careful with the words that they say on TV. He didn't say it in a joking manner, but I took it to mean something like when someone says, "Man, I could just kill you." not meaning actual killing, but to do harm.

              So are you OK with Pat advocating harm to Levi? Which is what he is really doing.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 10:30 am ET)
                  14
                Not in a joking manner? are you kidding?? You can hear him....and everyone else laughing as he said it. What more would he have to do to make it "in a joking manner"??
                Report Abuse
                • Author by mjh (July 13, 2009 10:41 am ET)
                  9  
                  Not in a joking manner? are you kidding?? You can hear him....and everyone else laughing as he said it. What more would he have to do to make it "in a joking manner"?? - pov


                  I seem to recall Liz Trotta laughing when she "joked" about assassinating Obama and bin Laden . . . and later apologizing.

                  Why would she need to apologize for a "joke"?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by IRONY 101 (July 13, 2009 11:03 am ET)
                    10  
                    It's a freakin' tasteless joke... I am appalled that that these cretins laughed at it. Dave Letterman, a professional comic, cracked a tasteless joke about Sarah Palin's daughter and he apologized after Sarah and her right wing supporters acted as though Letterman had advocated statutory rape. Pat Buchanan is a dinosaur...and I hope his kind soon become extinct.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (July 13, 2009 10:27 am ET)
              5  
              Did I say that?

              No, I did not. Apparently, someone can't comprehend the words on the screen.

              Do I think Pat is advocating murder? No, probably not, but one has to be careful with the words that they say on TV. He didn't say it in a joking manner, but I took it to mean something like when someone says, "Man, I could just kill you." not meaning actual killing, but to do harm.

              So are you OK with Pat advocating harm to Levi? Which is what he is really doing.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by harley (July 13, 2009 10:35 am ET)
              10  
              so you are realllyyyyyyyyy going to tell me that Pat was serious, and advocating murder on live tv? Y


              Your fellow teabagging terrorists are always advocating murder on live tv when they insist we bomb Iran, Iraq, NK, Cuba, Russia, etc., etc., etc

              Report Abuse
              • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 10:38 am ET)
                  10
                HMMMM i seem to remember a LOT of dems who supported both wars. I guess they are terrorists as well.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by harley (July 13, 2009 10:43 am ET)
                  8 1
                  No. Conservative = terrorism. This is fact.

                  Terror from the Right: 75 plots, conspiracies and racist rampages since Oklahoma City
                  Report Abuse
                    • Author by progressiveright (July 13, 2009 11:57 am ET)
                      7  
                      Harley was not saying the Dems do no wrong he was saying that the right has been invoulved in 75 plots that are forms of terrorism since the Oklahoma City bombing. When you reply to a post make sure you are repluing to what is said.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by progressiveright (July 13, 2009 11:58 am ET)
                        3  
                        That should be replying to what is said.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 11:59 am ET)
                            6
                          PR

                          He said conservative = terrorism. That is pretty clear.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by progressiveright (July 13, 2009 2:40 pm ET)
                            3  
                            No he said conservitives have conducted 75 terrorist plots not that conservatives are terrorists. You are the one saying that conservatives are terorists.
                            Report Abuse
                  • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 11:58 am ET)
                      7
                    So are you now saying that if any dem in the house or senate believes that we need to use the military against any of the countries you listed, then they are terrorists?

                    Is Obama not a terrorist by your standards for not removing ALL US troops from Iraq the moment he took office? Is he not adding terrorists now?

                    Biden has a son serving in the war. Is he a terrorist?

                    Please harley, educate us all with your world view.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by vhw28672478 (July 13, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
                      6  
                      you are wrong Buchanan is a moron
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
                          8
                        OH..vhw...another of your famous....you are wrong posts. Of course, you never back anything thing up, or respond in any other way. What a simple child you are.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by magnolialover (July 13, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
                      4  
                      Did you click on his link? You know, the one where he was talking about conservatives who commit terrorism in the US?

                      He wasn't equating all terrorists to conservatives, he was linking to a specific study/story.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 1:03 pm ET)
                          5
                        And I can provide you with links about the Earth Liberation Front, and acts of terrorism they have committed. But i have never said that liberal = terrorist.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by magnolialover (July 13, 2009 1:07 pm ET)
                          7 1
                          ELF has never killed anyone. That doesn't mean that what they do is right, it most certainly isn't, and they have caused millions dollars worth of damage to property, and that has weighed on people, and "injured" people, financially.

                          So what else do you have?
                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by justjoe628 (July 13, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
                      3
                    Are you kidding me? How ridiculous could you be. That's like trying to say every muslim in America is a terrorist or eco-terrorist make every liberal a terrorist. Those extremist have absolutely nothing to do with the average run of the mill conservative (or democrat for that matter) who simply think that less government involvment in my life is better. You lose credibility when you make outlandish comparisons like that.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by magnolialover (July 13, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
                      1  
                      It just ends up that some of those same folks who didn't want govt intrusion in their lives ended up blowing up a building in OK.
                      Report Abuse
            • Author by mjh (July 13, 2009 4:19 pm ET)
              3  
              "It was a joke you idiot. Lighten up."

              "Ok,,,,so you are realllyyyyyyyyy going to tell me that Pat was serious, and advocating murder on live tv? You are dumber than I thought!!"


              You'll have to forgive me, pointlessview -- I'm afraid I lack the insight into the mind of the wingnut that you so readily possess.

              It's just SO difficult to tell when wingnuts are joking -- since wingnut "humor" always seems to involve murder.

              Take, for example, the wit and wisdom of Crazy Annie Coulter:

              "If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."

              "We need somebody to put rat poisoning in Justice Stevens' creme brulee. That's just a joke, for you in the media."
              Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (July 13, 2009 10:33 am ET)
          6  
          Sure. And if a Dem said anything even remotely resembling that what would your response be?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (July 13, 2009 10:33 am ET)
          3  

          Perhaps. But a "joke" is suppose to be funny. Either he's serious or he's just providing more proof that reich-wing teabaggers are not funny...ever.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (July 13, 2009 11:37 am ET)
          7  
          "It was a joke you idiot. Lighten up."

          Murder is not something that needs to be used as a prop for laughs... even you POV should see that? And I think that is why MMfA has created a thread about it!

          The corporate owned media has over the years created certain things to be acceptable over time... through TV to so-called 'news' casts...

          I think we can all agree that 'murder' should not be seen as humorous or used too .... "lighten the mood"
          Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 13, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
          3  
          Was it funny?

          I'd love to go around saying things like "If I could get away with it, I'd shoot Ann Coulter" or some other such nonsense. But I don't. (1) Because advoctaing violence is not funny. (2) It makes one sound like an idiot who doesn't have a real counter-argument to the person in question. (In the case of someone like Limbaugh and Coulter, the frustration is usually that there's so much BS that you don't even know where to start, but still - only fools talk like this.)

          What's more, considering how up-in-arms conservatives get over the humor of Letterman, Bill Maher, Kevin Smith, etc... I find it rather hypocritical when they use the "It's a joke" defense.
          plus those guys are actually FUNNY. Conservtaives only ever seem to be funny on a level equivalent to comedic thugery. (Sort of political equivalent of Andrew Dice Clay.) Leave the conservtive humor to the likes of Penn Gillette and PJ O'Rourke. The rest of you lot should stick to strait analysis. You still suck at it, but much less so.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by friedbergboy1422 (July 13, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
          7  
          Since it was a "joke" I expect we'll see the volume of conservative outrage which was directed at Letterman, the calls for Pat to be fired, etc, right?

          After all, he was "joking" about the father of Sarah Palin's grandchild and family is off-limits.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
              9
            So basically what you are saying Fried, is that you want the outrage that was shown before, even though MMFA and most posters here thought Letterman did nothing wrong. You dont want the right thing to happen this time, because it not happen last time. I expected more from you, you are normally very reasonable.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by overmars jr. (July 13, 2009 12:37 pm ET)
              5  
              Again, your reading comprehension skills are lacking. He said:

              Since it was a "joke" I expect we'll see the volume of conservative outrage which was directed at Letterman...


              Now, try again.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (July 13, 2009 12:48 pm ET)
              4  
              Umm, actually I remember lots of people here NOT defending Letterman, because it was a stupid and tasteless joke.

              As is Pat's "joke" here.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (July 13, 2009 1:12 pm ET)
              3  
              "MMFA and most posters here thought Letterman did nothing wrong."

              A broadbrusing for which you have absolutely no proof.

              I never once defended Letterman on this site or anywhere else.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 13, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
              5  
              You people really don't understand hypocrasy, do you? Whenever you're called out for it, you accuse the other side of it.

              Here's the thing - we didn't care about Letterman's remark, and we don't really care about Pat's. ALthough I think Pat's made a fool of himself (one again) I couldn't care less what kind of stupid sh!t he says.

              But YOU LOT, who were SO OUTRAGED by Letterman, ought to step up and show the same outrage to Pat's comment.

              But you won't, because you're all a bunch of thuggish hypocrites without a sinlge principle among you.

              We're not saying you should share OUR outrage - we don't have any - only that you should judge these things remotely consistantly!!!
              Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (July 13, 2009 1:17 pm ET)
              4  
              "MMFA and most posters here thought Letterman did nothing wrong."

              Karl Frisch: "He's a gap-toothed, late night comedian, and he's in justifiably hot water with conservatives for making some pretty vile jokes... Letterman did the right thing in apologizing twice for his tasteless attempts at humor..."

              Yep, that's a pretty staunch declaration of no wrongdoing if I ever saw one.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by friedbergboy1422 (July 13, 2009 1:19 pm ET)
              4  
              Nope, and I called out Letterman. I only think that those who were outraged by Letterman's comments should be outraged by these comments by PB, why wouldn't they be outraged similarly?

              Why is PB's joke ok, but Letterman's is not?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (July 13, 2009 3:40 pm ET)
                3  
                Actually, Letterman's joke was fine. Had Letterman said, "Hey kids, you know what would be funny...if A-Rod impregnated Palin's daughter. That's what I think should happen." then they might be equivelent. A joke using irony and satire and advocacy for specific acts are two different things.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by friedbergboy1422 (July 13, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
                  1  
                  I wasn't "horrified" by Letterman, just wish he hadn't gone there. It didn't bother me that much, but there are plenty of things to make fun of Palin for other than her kids. Just thought he should be above Leno who trashed her family time after time with no reaction from Palin.

                  I agree with your reasoning, just didn't think Dave needed to go there, but my point stands. Where is the conservative outrage over this one?
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (July 13, 2009 12:58 pm ET)
          2  
          If you think that was a joke, POV, then YOU are the idiot. As we've always suspected.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (July 13, 2009 1:04 pm ET)
          1  
          What Pat Buchanan said over MSNBC was far worse than what Don Imus said about the Rutgers Women's Basketball team. And he deserves to be fired because of it.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by oneleft (July 13, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
          3  
          wanda sykes joked, the "off limits" brigade was out in force.

          we've lost our sense of humor, obviously. except of course for rush who gets away with murder (oops, wrong choice of words) in the name of humor.

          speaking of which, all you ditto heads and right wing nut jobs need to realize that your mom lied to you all those years... she did raise a fool.

          hey, that's a joke! lighten up.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by PurpleState (July 13, 2009 3:24 pm ET)
          3  
          You know, people were saying this about David Letterman's humor a few weeks ago, and conservatives went absolutely insane, demanding Letterman apologize.

          Was "Lighten up" your reaction to Letterman, sir?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by The_Cat (July 13, 2009 4:32 pm ET)
             
          Two things, pointofview:

          1) Did you laugh? I didn't.

          2) If it -was- a joke, it's a very good thing that Buchanan's title is ANALyst, and not comedian... (See, -that- was a joke)
          Report Abuse
    • Author by MrBrown (July 13, 2009 9:40 am ET)
      7  
      Gee Pat, why not just waterboard him? That seems pretty legal these days...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MrBrown (July 13, 2009 9:42 am ET)
      3  
      Gee Pat, why not just waterboard him? That seems pretty legal these days...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by goesto11 (July 13, 2009 9:48 am ET)
        5  
        There's a problem with that logic.

        Waterboarding isn't meant to actually kill anyone. Pat's more in favor of full blown murder.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (July 13, 2009 9:49 am ET)
      3  
      Yep, when a kid tells the truth it's time to wake him up to the real world of Pat Buchanan's Nixonian LIES.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (July 13, 2009 10:04 am ET)
      1 1
      I am certainly no Pat Buchanan fan, but in this instance what he said was said in jest. I never watch Morning Joe, but I did this morning and I for one did not think for one minute he was serious when he said this. It was all in context of why is anyone asking Levi anything. No argument that Mika is a big Palin fan so of course she will dismiss levi as inconsequential and Buchanan just went with the flow with his feeble attempt at humor, but again, this was said in jest as far as I am concerned and MMFA has better things to report on than this from that show.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (July 13, 2009 10:18 am ET)
          7
        Of course it was a joke, but by MMFA standards, it was conservative Miss Info of course.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (July 13, 2009 10:27 am ET)
          4  
          Funny joke. Talking about drowing someone. As I said above, I don't think he was advocating actually drowing him, but you guys have a weird definition of what constitutes a joke.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (July 13, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
            2  
            ...but you guys have a weird definition of what constitutes a joke.


            They had a terrible joke living in the White House for the past eight years.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (July 13, 2009 10:37 am ET)
          3  
          Oh BS... if a Dem said that he/she would be ROASTED ALIVE and you know it. Your false outrage over the repsonses of some of our intelligent members here is transparent at a bare minimum.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (July 13, 2009 10:38 am ET)
          2  
          Oh BS... if a Dem said that he/she would be ROASTED ALIVE and you know it. Your false outrage over the repsonses of some of our intelligent members here is transparent at a bare minimum.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (July 13, 2009 11:13 am ET)
          5  
          And isn't that what we watch a news channel for? Jokes about killing people?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (July 13, 2009 11:57 am ET)
            2  
            Sure...and torture jokes, too. Did you hear the one about Levi slicing off Sarah's nipples with his hunting knife? Too funny... <sarcasm>

            Isn't that why everyone watches the news...for the black comedy?

            BTW, did you hear the one about Hitler and Michelle Obama...?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 13, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
          3  
          I ain't misinformation. Like most of the MMTV items, it's just one of numerous examples of a conservative saying something REALLY STUPID.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (July 13, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
          2  
          Of course it was a joke...


          Actually, it was another fine example of reichpublicans wanting to take away free speech from anyone who disagrees with him. It's loud and clear that the message from Buchannon was that Levi should shut up.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (July 13, 2009 10:19 am ET)
        3  
        Of course, he wasn't serious, but, do you think he could have phrased things a little better?

        I agree, why is anyone asking Levi anything? He certainly learned something from Palin about using up your entire 15 minutes of fame, and trying to remain in the spotlight as much as possible.

        Maybe Levi and Joe the Plumber can get their own Fox show?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (July 13, 2009 10:16 am ET)
      5  
      I miss the good old days when the Palins simply sued anyone who criticized them.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by RABBITLUVR (July 13, 2009 10:38 am ET)
        2  
        I don't. In fact, I wish they would go back to being Wasilla nobodies... I for one am tired of their stupidity. I don't even want that brood in the press any more.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by KLJTech (July 13, 2009 10:29 am ET)
      6  
      I assume that Pat would have no problem the with Michelle Obama doing exactly the same to Tammy Bruce? Should President Obama choke out Savage or does the same free speech that allows these hate spewing talking heads to remain on the air also protect Levi?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (July 13, 2009 10:54 am ET)
      4  
      Levi committed two major mistakes. He criticized a conservative, and he had the actual facts on his side. To hear Buchanan calling for the murder of someone like that is not all that surprising to me. As for calling it a joke, I didn't hear Mr. Buchanan say he was joking, and MSNBC seemed pretty intent on pointing out that -they- were not advocating personal injury or murder.

      Guys, that's just how conservatives in power tend to want to deal with anyone who doesn't go along.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 13, 2009 11:50 am ET)
        2  
        Levi's first mistake was being born Alaskan white trash. His second mistake was consorting with Alaskan white trash instead of trying to better himself.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (July 13, 2009 10:59 am ET)
      1  
      Levi committed two major mistakes. He criticized a conservative, and he had the actual facts on his side. To hear Buchanan calling for the murder of someone like that is not all that surprising to me. As for calling it a joke, I didn't hear Mr. Buchanan say he was joking, and MSNBC seemed pretty intent on pointing out that -they- were not advocating personal injury or murder.

      Guys, that's just how conservatives in power tend to want to deal with anyone who doesn't go along.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seeryer (July 13, 2009 11:01 am ET)
        2
      Pat does not even like Palin. Pat was kidding about the literal part of drowning. Don't play dumb. This is worth an item on MMFA but I hope members wont try to make this out that Pat was serious. Howie Kurtz may post an item on his blog saying, MMFA readers play dumb about Pat's Eli joke.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by seeryer (July 13, 2009 11:05 am ET)
           
        CORRECTION:
        Howie Kurtz may post an item on his blog saying, MMFA readers play dumb about Pat's Eli joke. MMFA readers play dumb about Pat's Levi joke.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 13, 2009 11:06 am ET)
        3  
        Pat does not even like Palin.

        What...are you kidding? Buchanan adores Palin and her husband...both of whom were his supporters. You should keep up with the news...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by seeryer (July 13, 2009 1:02 pm ET)
          1  
          That was not the point of my post but since it seems it is play dumb day on comments I will address it. Pat likes Palin more than he likes Obama. I am not sure Buchanan voted for her in '08 but it would not surprise me. So you think Pat really is sugesting murdering Levi Johnston because they supported him in 2000? How about adressing that Irony?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (July 13, 2009 1:06 pm ET)
               
            It was a tasteless joke...and coming from a trogolodyte like Buchanan, it sounds like something offensive Buchanan would say.

            But, hey...don't you think Levi should get some of his buddies to gang rape Sarah Palin to get even with her...? Yuk, yuk, yuk... Funny, huh...?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by seeryer (July 13, 2009 7:08 pm ET)
                 
              Not funny. But I don't think you are advocating that action against her. We agree.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by o rly (July 13, 2009 11:31 am ET)
      3  
      But Pat, Levi is a white male!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (July 13, 2009 11:34 am ET)
      1  
      Kidding, maybe. A stupid thing to say, yes.

      One thing Pat is forgetting is the Mr. Palin has been called a lot of things except one..P-Whipped. Just look at the dude. Pat may not realize that this Levi kid may knock the "First PW'd" through the roof. He already sort of 'knocked' one of them into a different lifestyle.

      Signed
      D.Letterman, not the POW
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 13, 2009 11:38 am ET)
         
      Hey, Pat...giggle, giggle...maybe Levi ought to put a plastic bag over Sarah's head...snicker, snicker...and hold it real tight until Sarah's face turns blue and her feet stop kicking...yuk, yuk...and then take his bear hunting knife and cut her tongue out...tee, hee, hee...and then, for good measure, take his twelve-gauge shotgun and blow her freakin' head offguffaw, guffaw...

      Oh, yea...this is all just a joke. Hysterical, huh...?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (July 13, 2009 11:38 am ET)
        1
      MSNBC = Fair and Balanced.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (July 13, 2009 11:40 am ET)
      2  
      It seems like Pat thinks Sarah's political ambitions should be more important to Todd than his daughter's well being. Otherwise he would have suggested this course of action when he first learned of the pregnancy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by progressiveright (July 13, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
      2  
      This is from a man who says he hold the Christian values in the highest of esteam. Murder then should not even be a joke to someone who makes this claim. This guy is a nothing more than a joke himself for showing his hyprocracy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (July 13, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
        1  
        Typical Buchanan hypocrisy..Of course he disn't mean it literally but he wants Levi to shut up ..why???He's always talking about supporting the Constitution/freedom of speech ,etc......As much as the Palins use the media to whine about how they are covered by the so called"Liberal Media"..Levi should be able to tell his side if he disagrees with how they(the Palins) portray him.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by justjoe628 (July 13, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
        1
      Joke or not, I totally agree that his remarks are way off base. If you are going to criticize what other people say, then you need to hold yourself to a higher standard.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (July 13, 2009 12:48 pm ET)
         
      "It was a joke you idiot. Lighten up."

      Murder is not something that needs to be used as a prop for laughs... even you POV should see that? And I think that is why MMfA has created a thread about it!

      The corporate owned media has over the years created certain things to be acceptable over time... through TV to so-called 'news' casts...

      I think we can all agree that 'murder' should not be seen as humorous or used too .... "lighten the mood"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (July 13, 2009 1:01 pm ET)
      2  
      I was appalled last summer when they dragged Levi out on the stage in the first place. He wasn't part of the family yet, even though Bristol was pregnant. I have no problem the a family for having a teen pregnancy, it happens even in the best of families nowadays. But, I thought it was cruel to put a teen romance under that national spotlight. When these things break up, as they usually do, the spotlight seems even brighter and garish. The Palin family used Levi last summer, but they have been angry with him, and nasty to him since the break-up, when he decided to speak out for himself. If you are going to bring someone into the spotlight and speak for him, as the Palins did, you shouldn't be too surprised when the person decides to speak for themselves or stay on the stage, as Levi has done. The Palins have not been silent on the issues when they should have. I think more of Levi for what he has said about the Governor knowing or his not being allowed unsupervised visits with his son, than I do of the Palins for issuing snarky put downs of this young man in their press releases. This sort of dirty laundry is worthy of Jerry Springer, not the national political discourse. Pat's joke was tasteless, and maybe a nun should be called upon to smack his knuckles or soap his mouth.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (July 13, 2009 1:02 pm ET)
      5  
      Buchanan: "Todd Palin ought to take Levi down to the creek and hold his head underwater until the thrashing stops"


      So much for Pat Buchanan's "pro-life" credentials....
      Report Abuse
      • Author by progressiveright (July 13, 2009 2:43 pm ET)
        1  
        Like much of the right he is only for things when they benifit him or those he agrees with. If what is being said or done hurts the rights arguement it must be stopped at all costs. This shows how fake the right is.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by TheThief672 (July 13, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
      1  
      Anyone who has ever read any of my previous post on Buchanan threads knows that I can't stand him and think he is the biggest idiot. But, as a student of NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming) I do know that 85% of communication is tonality. So this one time I find myself defending PB because (after watching this video 4x) he is smiling as he makes the comment showing that to him this is a joking statement. Personally, this does not change my views on PB because this only adds to the long list of inappropriate comments he has made live on the air. I continue to not watch MSNBC until PB is removed as a commentator. He still is and always will be a moron.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Litwiz (July 13, 2009 3:05 pm ET)
         
      Whether or not Rev. Buchanan was "joking" or not is irrelevant in this context. He is appearing here with the moniker of "analyst" and we expect him to "analyze"--break down into simple pieces, scrutinize each piece, then put the pieces back together again into meaningful context and content. His comment isn't analysis but commentary. I don't need a doddering old man who claims "pro-life" when convenient, but espouses drowning a political thorn-in-the-side on the other. If he's a pundit, he gets away with it; as an analyst, MSNBC needs to reconsider the use of him. Personally, I don't listen to him when he's on.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by roninkannushi1711 (July 13, 2009 4:19 pm ET)
         
      Funny Pat... Yep, ahem, O.K! It if was anyone Pat did not approve of, what would he say? His chopping hand gesture, with his classic, "Look!..," would lead into excuses, stories, and lies.
      So, what else is new? His end of the whip has not felt the lash of the other. Must be nice!

      (At least, Pat is a very good ecologist, not wanting to cut trees for water-boards.)
      Report Abuse