Beck criticizes senators' "questioning" of Sotomayor at today's hearing ... but the questioning starts tomorrow

Well, as the Beckster said on the view, he does opinion, not reportage. The fact that his opinions always do violence to reality is irrelevant. Maybe not always. He might like beagles.

Still with the most overturned BS. Beck wouldn't know facts if they were in a rocks glass.

Our country is "burning to the ground"? Really? Where and how?

Becky, you are an extremist, but you and your myopic audience don't realize this simple fact.

Oops. Beck must have used tomorrow's script ahead of time....such an eager Beaver.
Good 'ole boy Republican senators made a buncha stupid opening remarks, though. Maybe he was talking about them?

Note the headline under Beck. It's not biased or inflamatory. Somebody is slipping.

Wow... you're right, this country is burning to the ground...

I was so upset this weekend that I didn't get any mail on Sunday!
Also, I went to the park to look at the Fourth of July Fireworks on Saturday and there were no fireworks!!

What is this country coming to!

Poor, poor, poor thing. My, my, my Glenn Beck seemed to be confused as to what today's Hearing for the Supreme Court Nominee was all about. Umph, umph, umph.

Oh well, tomorrow if Glenn starts to cry (again) maybe it will be because he's confused of what's really going on in our Country, and he is just plain "LOST" with his own non-sense he's been speaking about over the past few months. Uh, oh. LOL

Facepalm caption FTW

I caught part of Glenn today, towards the end of the show where he was talking about rioting in France, and how he thinks that these riots are coming to the U.S. in two years. He admitted he might be wrong about the timing but he believes an armed rebellion is coming to America. But he is the one who loves America, and me, because I am a liberal and favor unions and national health insurance, I hate America! This man is dangerous, and his advocacy of treason is likely to increase in the future.

I'm sorry. I just can't listen to this guy anymore.

Why is it that people like him are so enamored of the Preamble to the Constitution but love ignoring all but the second amendment? And they're always trying to find ways to amend the Constitution that will deny rights to others.

TV ranters should be forced to understand the things they use as props during the two minute hate.

Glenn Beck is like that kid nobody liked in eigth grade so far out of the " cool zone "

Good Grief, Becky Boy. Today was the Senators' turn in the spotlight (and it may be tomorrow, will have to wait and see how many of them answer their own questions before the Candidate has a chance).

Is it only me or is it a travisty that Beck has part of the Constitution behind him while disrespecting a person who defends the Constitution.

Now Gop'ers not only read minds they see the future.

Oh, and you got a screenshot of him doing an impression of any sane person watching his show!

Hey Beck, there was not one single question, in any of the remarks you played.

Hey Beck, there was not one single question, in any of the remarks you played.

Beck is still auditioning for Rush Limbaugh's fans. What is profound is the mirroring of other powerful communities and organizations and government bodies that is portrayed in this segment where he associates or makes the "connections" between ACORN and sums up Sotomayor in a "nutshell". Beck did not do to bad in this thing! He exposed the private involvements of someone who is going to be public. Private Life always affects Public Life. There are some SCJ who have been involved in high profiled controversy and standings on some issues that would seem to affect the way they administer justice as well. This will not dismiss Sotomayor either from the same scrutiny. Too much heritage pride is the road to supremist interpretation and I agree where the people are saying they see a problem once the SCJ is reached. You can applaud intellect in one frame, and then examine what one will do with the opportunities and advantages that that intellect will provide. This is the argument and it is good. Very! I have said before that she is not my choice, but I do say that the boys are in for some brake pads because they have an 18 wheeler to deal with. She is being put to us as a candidate to check the unbalance that already exist and from a study point of view, she will automatically go into that mode within interpretations of the law. You boys will be dealt with according to your works and if the slightest infraction appears, Sotomayor will not hesitate to challenge it. This is my only reason for backing her to this point, I see what good she can do. This is the concern! You have to know not to offend Americans when you serve for them. You see, she didn't fight to serve the Puerto Rican community in her life long committement, She chose to go into the American cultuere where we make amends to "justice for all". Leave yourself at the front door before sitting at the table.

Hey, when you really don't know what is going on, there really isn't a reason not to let everyone know how dumb you are.

I think it was Ed Schultz(?) that I was listening to yesterday that made the most sense. (paraphrasing) Why is she even here for this session. Today is all about every senator getting his 5 minutes in front of the mike, it isn't about the confirmation process at all.

BTW This is one of our countries problems now. Politicians are more concerned about appearing on the record, or pandering to their base, than they are about fixing any problems that might concern everyone else in the country.