About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Foxy News breaks out the boudoir B-roll to cover "the great breast augmentation scandal"

July 14, 2009 10:20 pm ET

From the July 14 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Foxy News honesty: "[W]e'll be seeing some more of this, probably right here on Fox"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by btrue10280 (July 14, 2009 10:26 pm ET)
      2  
      Looks like the next female news anchor on Fox.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 14, 2009 10:29 pm ET)
        4  
        Or next Republican Vice-Presidential candidate...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by neon desert (July 14, 2009 10:50 pm ET)
          5  
          More likely just the next recipient of another "enhanced" O'Really phone call.

          "Liz! Get me Ms. Hansen on the phone, and my falafel! Stat!"
          Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (July 14, 2009 11:20 pm ET)
          1  

          Egads, don't compare that D-list looking porn star from Wasilla to this fine looking woman.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (July 15, 2009 12:45 am ET)
            2 1
            Wasn't breast augmentation one of the illegal contract violations committed by the former reichwing beauty queen of California? You know, the one they defended to the end because she hates gay people?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mookie von zipper (July 15, 2009 2:47 am ET)
              1 6
              ostensibly fired for "contract violations", but really because of this ill-conceived notion "she hates gay people"... she does not hate gay people and was not defended for that...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (July 15, 2009 3:15 am ET)
                3  
                No, I'm very sure she was defended for her hateful gay people comment. She should have been fired up front like Miss Nevada was for violating her contract, but the reich defended her to the end because she made a statement during her reichauguration about gay marraige that pleased the reich.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by johnrod10 (July 15, 2009 7:49 am ET)
                  1 1
                  There is nothing hateful about saying that a marriage contract should be between a man and a woman. You are way out of line with your accusations.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 15, 2009 8:20 am ET)
                       
                    Yes, there is, and no, he isn't.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by nerzog (July 15, 2009 9:13 am ET)
                      1
                    It is an opinion based on bigotry; I don't care who says it. There are plenty of Democrats who have expressed the same viewpoint, but it is based on bigotry, nonetheless.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by johnrod10 (July 15, 2009 9:34 am ET)
                         
                      President Obama shares Mrs. Prejean's opinion.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by neon desert (July 15, 2009 9:50 am ET)
                           
                        President Obama is wrong.

                        Don't faint. Us liberals prefer critical support for our chosen party over the kind of blind support that this country witnessed from 2001-2008 which resulted in an administration which will go down as the worst in history.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by snoopy (July 15, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
                       
                    Not an accusation. It was a fact.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 15, 2009 10:38 am ET)
                   
                She holds anti-gay political opinions, even if she to f--king stupid to realize it. And she was defended by the right because of the "ill-conceived notion" that she was being fired for them. (As if there was anything wrong with that.)
                Report Abuse
                • Author by johnrod10 (July 15, 2009 12:31 pm ET)
                     
                  Her opinion is not any different than President Obama's.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 15, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
                       
                    What a presidential candidate will say to avoid getting smeared by the gay-hating opposition party does not necissarily constitute his full opinion. Presiodent Obama will make strides toward amrriage equallity, and gay rights in general, the most important of which will be appointed non-bible-humpers to the judiciary. I also don't se him vetoing any legislation that gives equal rights to gays. What's more by taking the slow approach he is, he insures that the prgress is made at a rate that is palatable (slow) enough for the moderate population that there will be minimal backlash and the progress will be permamnent.

                    Carrie Prejhean is just an idiot who thinks that we have "choice" in this country when many do not. She could just as well have been fired for the idiocy of that statement, absent any and all percieved bigotry.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mookie von zipper (July 16, 2009 12:18 am ET)
                         
                      now we know robert gibbs' screen name: nice guy eddie... only a political hack could spin a shared opinion like that of the president and the would-be miss california with such deftness... and behind the screen name he can be more derogatory...
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 16, 2009 8:40 am ET)
                           
                        HAHAHA. I'm not sure if I should feel insilted of flattered. I guess I take flattered, considering the source, and say THANK YOU, but no. I'm merely an engineer, and just acknowlwedging political reality. No could get elected promising gay marriage. He's more progressive than most, and I'll still bet you a Coke that he wouldn't veto any legislation that grants gyas the right to marry.

                        Ms. Prejean OTH would, and still end up saying somethign stupid like, "You already have a choice, why do we have to make it a law?"
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by johnrod10 (July 16, 2009 6:23 am ET)
                         
                      Uh...nice try, but that was a pathetic attempt to excuse the President while excoriating Mrs. Prejean. The most disingenuous post I've seen so far. The President does not support same-sex marriage and neither does Mrs. Prejean. Any so-called "bigotry" or "hate" that you attribute to her based her opinion you must also attribute to the President. I dont think it gets any more clear than that.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 16, 2009 8:41 am ET)
                           
                        So... you think he'd veto a gay-marrige bill if it bass the H & S?

                        I'll bet you a Coke that he wouldn't veto any legislation that grants gays the right to marry.

                        Ms. Prejean OTH would, and still end up saying somethign stupid like, "You already have a choice, why do we have to make it a law?"
                        Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (July 14, 2009 10:38 pm ET)
      2  
      Bill-0 will be following this, looking to get some 'hands on' experience in the subject.

      loofah

      Report Abuse
    • Author by neon desert (July 14, 2009 10:43 pm ET)
      2  
      There ya go, Bill! Covering the latest supermodel scandal. Reporting the least significant issues of the day. Back to doin' what ya do breast! ...errrr, best.

      C'mon, admit it Billy - isn't it much better rooting from the skin zone than spending all your time trying to convince everyone that you're relevant?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 14, 2009 10:50 pm ET)
        3  
        Billy-boy aspires to be an expert braille body language expert. Yuk, yuk...

        BTW, how many more times do you think Billy's viewers will get to see this clip?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by neon desert (July 15, 2009 12:34 am ET)
          1  
          I'm afraid that clip is now part of Billdos private collection. Along with a loop of Liz repeating "...operate on my breasts".
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mookie von zipper (July 15, 2009 3:13 am ET)
            2
          twice already, 10pm cst and 1am cst... maybe once more this weekend... i'm definitely setting my dvr...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 15, 2009 8:21 am ET)
            1 1
            I'll bet that even after you set it, it'll still be blinking 12:00.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 14, 2009 10:51 pm ET)
        2  
        Billy-boy aspires to be an expert braille body language expert. Yuk, yuk...

        BTW, how many more times do you think Billy's viewers will get to see this clip?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mookie von zipper (July 15, 2009 3:06 am ET)
        1 6
        characterizing this report, devoting merely 2 minutes of a 60 minute broadcast to an interesting lawsuit accompanied by video associated with the story, as fox's sexploitation of a non story, is yet another example of media matters gripping for every little swipe they can take at fox and conservatives in general, in the process weakening any real valid criticisms they have to offer... a glance at their homepage is evidence of this, with what might be insightful critiques of conservatives lost among a page riddled with whiny thin-skinned complaints at the slightest hint of injustice perpetrated by the evil right wing...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mookie von zipper (July 15, 2009 3:17 am ET)
        1 6
        oh, and i regret to inform you, o'reilly is indeed relevant... and he doesn't spend any time trying to convince anyone of this, particularly people who think he spends all his time trying to do so...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (July 15, 2009 3:23 am ET)
          2 1
          relevant to racists...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 15, 2009 8:23 am ET)
            1
          If you feel you have to tell somebody BillO's relevant, he isn't.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by temphandle inventions25escorts (July 15, 2009 9:00 am ET)
            1
          As I read your comment, I got an even better feel for the demographics of Mr. O'Reilly's target audience. They are ill informed, bias, and, what's worse, their grammar and syntax is horrible.

          May I suggest for you The Elements of Style by Strunk and White. It is a classic and would help you as you grapple with the finer points of the English language.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by JoeSixpack (July 15, 2009 9:33 am ET)
               
            "Bias" - noun.
            "Biased" - adjective.

            No one is "bias," though they might be biased. I don't normally like to play grammar nazi, but if when you criticize someone else's use of language you might want to try getting it right yourself.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by riverdog (July 15, 2009 10:55 am ET)
               
            wow i like your style. you point out how superior you are over the ill informed and for a great sterotype you add a book to read. yup you a bigot to admire.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mookie von zipper (July 16, 2009 12:05 am ET)
               
            no grappling here, so i'll pass on strunk and white and stick with my own style, thank you... in this digital age i feel no compunction whatsoever to be bound by antiquated rules of communication... if you, sir/madam, had any command of the english language, you might try addressing the point of my comment, rather than spewing your elitist tripe, so try selling that **** to the tourists...

            since apparently i'm an ill informed target demo, i'll leave you with a comment by one mr max cady, as portrayed by robert deniro, who media matters would have you believe is the quintessential fox demographic: "i ain’t no white-trash piece of ****.... i’m better than you all... i can out-learn you... i can out-read you... i can out-think you... and i can out-philosophize you... and i’m gonna out-last you..."

            i'm sure strunk and white would have a field day with that one...



            Report Abuse
            • Author by mookie von zipper (July 16, 2009 9:33 pm ET)
                 
              strunk and white would have said "...whom media matters would...", as well... but i can only speculate since i have no intention of reading them...



              Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (July 14, 2009 11:25 pm ET)
      2 1
      Nothing on O'Reilly's show informs his devoted fans better than a flesh fantasy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (July 14, 2009 11:33 pm ET)
      1  
      tits probably the breast job of acting like a pornolist ever by loofah boy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (July 15, 2009 2:41 am ET)
        2  
        We are just reaching the tit of the iceberg concerning this story...oops, should be TIP.
        Don't know what came over me. Okay it wasn't my breast post ever, I'm sorry...again, oops, should be BEST.

        I am such a boob sometimes for which I'd like to apologize..

        Wait, I think someone is at the door, I hear the knockers...yes, it should be knockers.

        Tomorrow, FoxNews will augment the augmentation scandal by using Super HDTV where they will nipple this story in the bud...should be NIP this story..
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (July 15, 2009 9:16 am ET)
             
          Hey, what gives? Last time I tried to use the word "tit", the Cyber Nanny blocked it. I then tried to substitute "teat" and still got blocked. Is Cyber Nanny sleeping?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by political_left-religious_right (July 15, 2009 9:43 am ET)
             
          Time to break out the Drudge headline--Busted!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by solon (July 15, 2009 1:33 am ET)
         
      Whatever else is going on here Monica is HOT
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ShrinkGov (July 15, 2009 6:53 am ET)
         
      You people are pretty funny. If someone doesn't agree with your kool-aide drinking left wing nonsense then he's a racist. I'm no big O'Reiley fan but he's certainly more fair than that that fool on the left, Oberman. Old Bill even says he's green and buys into the global warming nonsense. You enviromental wackos should love Bill.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (July 15, 2009 12:52 pm ET)
           
        Interesting viewpoint.

        'Liberals should love a racist because he recognizes global warming.' That's food for thought.

        Thank you for helping clear up the mystery of Bush getting a second term.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle inventions25escorts (July 15, 2009 8:56 am ET)
         
      This is simply an opportunity for the sex obsessed O'Reilly to show more sex related pictures and to say "breast" over and over again. "If you amuse me, I'm going to follow the story?" Get real! If it has to do with sex, O'Reilly is going to follow it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (July 15, 2009 12:42 pm ET)
         
      That was shocking! I was so appalled I had to watch it 5 times. (j/k)
      Report Abuse