Schultz responds to Limbaugh calling him Mr. Ed, says Limbaugh is a "coward"
July 15, 2009 9:13 pm ET
From the July 15 edition of MSNBC's The Ed Show:
Previously:
Expand All
Expand 1st Level
Collapse All
-
Luntz: "The Unabomber has a higher favorability rating than some members of Congress"
March 18, 2010 10:00 pm ET -
-
On O'Reilly, Beck claims that progressives' view of social justice is a "perversion" of religion
March 18, 2010 9:12 pm ET -
-
Fox's Cameron baselessly claims health care reform process subjected to "skew[ed] legislative procedure"
March 18, 2010 7:20 pm ET -
Activist Beck calls on viewers to "camp out if you have to" for planned rally opposing health care
March 18, 2010 6:46 pm ET
-
The media myth of Obama's "falling poll numbers"
by Eric Boehlert - March 17, 2010 -
How to annoy Glenn Beck in five minutes or less
by Karl Frisch - March 16, 2010 -
Media Matters: In which Glenn Beck hosts talk of tickle fights
by Greg Lewis - March 12, 2010
|
|
||
Connect & Share
© 2010 Media Matters for America. All rights reserved.
  |
||
How obvious can Ed be?
Rush is the biggest coward in the media.
He sits on his fat draft-dodging butt for 3 hours, pontificating on stuff he has no idea what he's talking about, makes up anything and everything about people he doesn't like, and does ads.
The one time he dared come out of his cocoon, where he's protected my multiple layers from contrary views, as a guest host of the old Pat Sajak talk show.
He failed absolutely miserably.
His own half-hour TV show degenerated in hysterical whining and re-running the same old video clip until his own hand-picked audience was screaming at him to knock it off.
Face it. Rush is a failure. Even with all his money.
I recall a CBS exec or some other VIP at the network saying that Limpjaw was mortified after that debacle and it destroyed his confidence for quite some time.
How dare Mister Ed call me a coward, why I.. buck, buck, buck, buck, squwack!
Oh Willlburrrrr!
Face it. Limpjaw's no match for Big Eddie. And deep down underneath all that false machismo he spews on the radio... he knows it. THAT'S why he wimps out everytime a lib makes him a genuine offer to debate.
This time use our own brain, and leave Rush's talking points in the sewer.
"liberals are nasty poo poo heads."
There, that should set things reich. Now we can be friends again. Want to go downtown and pick out brown shirts together tomorrow?
I give all the so-called conservatives a challenge-Prove you're right for a change instead of giving us hyperbole and blind patriotism.
You can't do it because you can't help opening your mouth before your brain kicks in.
You conservatives don't know how to debate, unless it means denigrating your opponents in the basest fashion.
Here's my e-mail:rinehart7093@gmail.com
There. Are you up for the challenge?
You think calling someone a hypocrite (with a nice exclamation point at the end, like Emile Zola) isn't denigrating? Take off your blinders.
unlike conservatives like you and rush, liberals arent obsessed with huge ratings to boost a massive ego and make up for any lack of knowledge or intelligence, which conservatives clearly have an issue with.
I'm curious, with all the bluster and spewing the Rush does on a daily basis... he must really think he's a smart guy... so what possible reason would Rush have (or you for doing your pathetic best) at defending Rush in this one? Being he's such a genius and all.
I have no radio show or TV show... I'm just a simple average American who follows politics and seeks truth, but I seriously doubt Rush would even want to debate me, for just those reasons.
Also, this is not about whether Ed Schultz has '10's of dozens' of viewers or millions... this is about Rush Limbaugh being a loud mouth drug addled punk who is to much a puss to go anywhere but Fox-Noise where they treat him like a queen!
So, really, why do you support him? Are you on his payroll?
See, reichies, Ed is offering your 'hero' a shot at really proving himself. Ed's a straight shooter, tough but as fair as fair can possibly be. So what's the problem? Why won't Limpjaw do it?
C'mon, reichies, enlighten us. What's the deal?
Of course Rush would never debate. His cowardice is legendary. He knows he has to have his microphone uncontested, spewing filth, in order to manipulate the dipsticks.
Cheap shot-I know, but I just know Rush is going to chicken out.
He deserves it, considering he wanted stiffer sentences for addicts(until he got busted).
Rush will never...EVER...debate ANYONE of substance. On ANYTHING.
The most important and right on target word in Ed's challenge is "coward." Spot. On.
Thank you, Al, frankly.
In one week Hannity interviewed Rush, Coulter and O'Reilly. What deversity. A fine meshing of ideals in the never ending quest for the truth.
I'd love to see Big Ed go toe to toe with Limbaugh.
I doubt it.
Schultz-Prager exchange: Schultz has engaged in a minor conflict with talk-show host Dennis Prager. Prager defended controversial comments made by William J. Bennett on the September 28, 2005 broadcast of his morning radio program, which Schultz characterized as being racist. Prager asserted that Schultz had quoted Bennett out of context and Schultz challenged Prager to a debate. Prager accepted the challenge but Schultz never responded. No debate has taken place and the issue appears to be dead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Schultz
Hmmm...seems that Schultz has a history of being a coward. But take heart small-minded liberals. The facts won't do a thing to open your closed minds.