Quinn to "schmuck" Obama: No U.S. "dark past" of slavery, "this was the civilization that had the tenacity to end it"
July 17, 2009 1:50 pm ET
From the July 17 edition of Clear Channels The War Room with Quinn and Rose:
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
















Seriously, there are people who listen to this kind of crap on a daily basis?
Schmuck, that is laughable from a schmuck like this jagoff.
If you listen to Quinney the Sexual Harrasser you will realize that he has no substance and reads other peoples writings but rarely gives them credit.
And then we have his, as SOME say, under the desk assistant phony Christian, backing him up. Today she read the 10 Commandments of Obama. Doesn't this dirtbag realize that everytime she calls Obama the Savior, the Chosen One that she slams her religion. What a pice of crap this woamn is..to think you are a Christian because you DO nice things is not a license to hate others..She has already said she hates Obama.
For those not familiar..jagoff means jagoff or someone like Quinn
Now what's happened is that MMFA wouldn't accept changes in my email status and I couldn't use a gravatar unless I had a valid and current email address. So I went with JJ1, not trying to fool anyone there ;-) After getting monitored for what seemed like a month, I was finally able to post as Juliajyane1 with my new gravatar.
Now I hope I don't get in trouble for this because I did contact them twice by email and once by phone to say I had this problem.
So your dream of two JJs is legit! But I only use JJ1 now.
Prince, I wondered if the Wheels was because your castle was on wheels. Now I see it's just the way you roll. Your chariots on wheels?
These freaks, Quinn, Limbaugh, Cunningham and their ilks, wouldn't know a true Christian if one bit them on the ass. Unfortunately there are many racists, selfish pigs that call themselves Christians.
It amazes me how many of them are truly ugly to the bone. They are ugly inside outside.
We sure did, Jimbo.
Too bad it was only AFTER --
- participating in it for 249 years
- ending the slave TRADE 60 years earlier
- numerous attempts to expand it to the western territories
- fighting a bloody Civil War
- a constitutional amendment finally did so
I believe it was Winston Churchill who said, "You can always count on the Americans to do the one right thing -- after they've done all the wrong ones."
Jim, please -- don't say another word until you've opened a history book . . .
I wouldn't count on him opening a history book, let alone reading one.
May I remind you that the country is only 233 years old. And when the constitutional amendment was passed the country was only 89 years old. It seems we learned alot quicker than most who participated in slavery, especially the countries that still engage in slavery. How long did Winston churchill's country engage in slavery?
In Britain, William Wilberforce had taken on the cause of abolition in 1787 after the formation of the Committee for the Abolition of the Slave Trade, inwhich he led the Parliamentary campaign to abolish the slave trade in the British Empire with the Slave Trade Act 1807, also campaigned for the abolition of slavery in British Empire, which he lived to see in the Slavery Abolition Act 1833
You may unwrap yourself from the flag at anytime.
Fog, as thin-skinned as fairlyawingnut is, if he ever unwrapped himself from the flag, I fear his internal organs would tumble out . . .
Boy am I glad I didn't cheat off of you in history class. Zangy did much better..but he could've studied more so we could both get better grades. That lazy bum.
1) Who was the first U.S. President who was born in the United States?
2) Can you figure out why the answer to that question is relevant to your statement about how "we learned alot [sic] quicker than most who participated in slavery"?
Americans need to get over both their arrogance AND their stupidity...such traits are incredibly UNbecoming (and dangerous!)
Idiot Hannity, is totally clueless at how stupid and arrogant he is and how stupid and arrogant our president would look if he went around bragging about all the good the U.S. has done and ignoring it's mistakes, as Hannity insists President Obama should be doing. In my travels, I found it is that arrogance, that other countries hated about America.
"Because their heroes like Hannity and Rush spew America #1 day after day on t.v. and radio." - robyn
Correct, robyn . . . and the funny thing is, five seconds later, they'll remind their sheeple to be DEATHLY AFRAID of something {Muslims, Obama, brown people, immigrants, etc.}
You'd THINK a country that's "No. 1" wouldn't have to be afraid of anything -- except maybe a temporary slip to No. 2 . . .
May I remind YOU that the first indentured servants were brought to the US in 1619 . . .
I know its hard to believe, but, as Brabantio said, there were people here prior to 1776.
Failliberal, I'm gonna do something I rarely do, and that's give you advice I read on a t-shirt:
"Don't let your mind wander . . . it's much too small to be out by itself" . . .
Yeah, after SEPTEMBER 11th and THE ANTHRAX ATTACKS happened on your watch.
The magnitude of our national honor is inversely proportional to the number of times that we, as a nation, practice restraint, because the relative difficulty of practicing said restraint is inversely proportional to the number of times we succeed in practicing restraint, and national honor is directly proportional to the difficulty in practicing said restraint. Ergo, because we had slavery for which we eventually practiced restraint, our national honor is infinitely greater than if we had no slavery from which to restrain ourselves.
Geez, it's so simple. What is wrong with you people?
Furthermore, America practiced a unique form of slavery known as chattell slavery in which human slaves are by title, the personal property of their owners with zero rights and little to no hope of emancipation. At least other forms of slavery in history had emancipation options and some written rules of treatment which of course were often ignored.
As a final point, 150 years ago isn't really that long at all. Americans tend to live in the present and future, and diminish history (maybe for a reason) in contrast to other cultures who retain national and cultural memory for millenia. There are many African Americans alive today with direct memories of former slave relatives or acquaintances who lived in their lifetime.
This myth of U.S. slavery as "ancient history" that has no contemporary relevancy is only convenient for the Jim Quinns of the world. Jingoism based on revisionist national histories requires the erasure of inconvenient historical realities that don't fit the pervasive myth of U.S. moral exceptionalism. The system of slavery practiced uniquely in the U.S. begs for revision and/or erasure in order to differentiate us from others as a morally superior people. Most Americans can't stomach the truth, which is that we're hardly "the light of the world" as Quinn puts it.
Let's not forget Jim Crow laws and the "seperate and unequal" phases of the nation's history.
Then look at how England fought to end slavery. William Wilburforce fought in the parliment for years to make it illegal and they were able to end it without the loss of blood and treasure.
I wonder which side started the process better.
Doesn't this troll know that there's still slavery and human trafficking going on today? Talk about ethnocentrism.
Thats why durring the Civil War France and England we willing to support the Confederacy and joined them in the wars, because they we all slave powers.....
Actually wait I forgot England and France wouldnt openly support the confederacy because as "free" nations they didnt want to give up moral superority (as your people would put it)by being alied with a slave power
1772: Britan outlaws slavery in england (not the empire)
1777: Scotland outlaws slavery
1794: France outlaws slavery
1807: Britan bans the slave trade in the empire
1808: US bans slave trade
1815: Congress of Vienna bans the slave trade in all of Europe
1833: Britan bans slavery in the empire
1865: US bans slavery
Wow looks like the US was on the cutting edge of Abolition, ending it a meer 87 years after Britan, 69 years after France, 32 years after the British Empire.....yep we the nation with the courage to free the slaves....and the only ones with the guts to need a WAR to make it Illegal.
Jim Quinn is a moron