About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Matthews grills birther bill co-sponsor: "Do you believe that Barack Obama is a legitimate, native-born American or not?"

July 21, 2009 6:32 pm ET

From the July 21 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Marker (July 21, 2009 6:37 pm ET)
      8 2
      Actual evidence and the repug just sits there with that feces eating grin on his face.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 21, 2009 6:38 pm ET)
      7 1
      Matthews nailed this smarmy guy who is doing nothing but playing to his igmorant base...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (July 21, 2009 7:05 pm ET)
        6 1
        Smarmy is right, though he did cop to the truth when he couldn't dance any longer.

        Were this guy and Boehner separated at birth, or is there also a C Street Tanning Salon for the powerful?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (July 21, 2009 8:06 pm ET)
          1 2
          Were this guy and Boehner separated at birth, or is there also a C Street Tanning Salon for the powerful?"


          If not Boehner, I'm thinking Brian Williams:

          [http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/files/Brian%20Williams.jpg]


          Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 21, 2009 7:25 pm ET)
        4 1
        his ignorant base
        And we know how to say "The Base" in Arabic, don't we, boys and girls?

        "Al Qaeda!"
        Report Abuse
    • Author by strikefighter (July 21, 2009 6:44 pm ET)
         
      I love the notion from this guy that this is all about looking forward. He seems to conveniently neglect the fact that this issue would not have even been raised by these Congresspersons without the rantings of the birther crowd. Here's my question though: what if Obama is reelected (assuming the highly unlikely event this bill were passed)? Do we force him to hand over his birth certificate before he can be sworn in for a second term. Or do we give him the benefit of the doubt?

      And his mention of the others who have run for president that would have made this an issue is total BS. If McCain had been elected, and people raised the issue of his natural born status or whatever, the GOP and the conservatives would have raised holy hell.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (July 21, 2009 6:48 pm ET)
      5 1
      from the same state that wants to abolish the requirement so that Schwartzneger can run for president............hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (July 21, 2009 7:25 pm ET)
        4 1
        That's what I was thinking. I bet a lot of these birthers were in favor of amending the Constitution so Ahhnold could run a couple of years ago. (He's a little less popular now, of course.)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (July 21, 2009 7:47 pm ET)
          3  
          Let's not also forget how the R's wanted to repeal the(ir) "two terms" amendment so Saint Ronnie could run again....
          Report Abuse
          • Author by ObaManure (July 21, 2009 10:15 pm ET)
              5
            Ammending the Constitution is CONSTITUTIONAL, using FRAUD and FOrgery to get elected is NOT. That is the difference.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (July 22, 2009 8:20 am ET)
              1  
              And since nobody has committed fraud or forgery your point is what exactly?
              Report Abuse
      • Author by bittermarv (July 22, 2009 8:28 pm ET)
        1  
        I have no desire to see a President Schwartzenegger, but why shouldn't he be allowed to be president? My parents came here from Germany 52 years ago. They made a life here, worked hard, bought a house, paid their taxes, put two kids through college without student loans, the whole American Dream. They ARE Americans. Why shouldn't someone who has lived the American Dream be eligible for that office?

        I think the eligibility requirement should be changed to require, say, 35 years of residency and citizenship.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cruisin1 (July 21, 2009 7:10 pm ET)
      1  
      Just got off the phone with Cambell's staff member (I'm in his district.) Guy on the phone hanged up on me when I asked why Cambell was wasting his time with this piece of crap legislation when my family has no healthcare now. Big mistake Mr. Cambell.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jinglejam (July 21, 2009 7:11 pm ET)
      1  
      Tweety's good for something after all.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seroquel (July 21, 2009 7:23 pm ET)
      5 1
      I had to hear it again.
      And the Republican is scrambling like a quarterback out of the pocket.
      Sacked!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lather (July 21, 2009 7:27 pm ET)
         
      Nice to see Matthews do his job!! So Sick of ALL of these fools with this birth cert. issue!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne1 (July 21, 2009 7:34 pm ET)
      7 1
      Birther Boy's a dancing machine

      He's a dance, dance, dance, dance, dancing machine
      Watch 'im get down, watch 'im get down
      As he do, do, do his thing
      Right on the screen
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 21, 2009 7:58 pm ET)
        6 1
        It's great when the weasels can't even keep a straight face while delivering their BS.

        Yes, of course you want to pass a redundant law requiring presidential candidates to prove they're eligible in order to stop all this nonsense asking for redundant proof of eligibility.

        The GOP is drowning quickly enough under their own failures, now they want to latch onto a big lead weight like the birfers to keep afloat?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by borealis (July 21, 2009 8:30 pm ET)
            1
          Col. H: I agree that the reason for the bill may be related to the birther crazies, but I'm having real trouble with my research in proving the law would be redundant. The Constitution says the candidate for Prez must be natural born, but I can't find which election authorities ask for a copy of the birth certificate as proof of the eligibility. The Federal Election Commission only seems to ask for proof of how many dollars you have collected for your campaign fund.

          I would really like to know who the person filing for POTUS shows the document to. If it isn't clear, maybe we are right to have a law, or at least a procedure, making it clear so we don't have to go through the BS.

          Can somebody give me the straight poop? Thanks.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 22, 2009 4:50 am ET)
            1  
            Good question, Borealis. I'd imagine that before running for Prez, a candidate would need to show more documents than I need to get a driver's license.

            Can you post the results of some of your research here, especially the requirements of the FEC that you've looked into??. That's interesting that they only ask how much money a candidate has collected. One would think that some government agency would check the citizenship of candidates.

            Any relevant info from your research that you could post here would be very helpful. If you have any information indicating that Obama has never provided a birth certificate to the proper authorities throughout the process of campaigning, being nominated, or being elected president, that would be pretty damning to him.

            Thanks in advance.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (July 22, 2009 8:22 am ET)
              1  
              And it's probably handled by the extensive and intensive background check that is done for a President elect before he takes office.

              For example, to get my most recent job, I had to go back 15 years and list every place I've lived, every living relative, every person I've lived with, and so on and so forth.

              I'm pretty sure they do a pretty good background check on the Prez.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 22, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
                   
                Mag, I think it would be prudent to wait until we've seen more of Borealis' "research" before jumping to any conclusions. :)
                Report Abuse
            • Author by borealis (July 22, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
                1
              Col. H: My research was really rather pedestrian. I searched for presidential eligibility and got the internet runaround. Most of the states, including Illinois, refer everyone to the FEC website. It is there that I found the filer only has to state name/address, name/address of campaign manager, and how much money they had already collected.

              When I added intel background checks to my searching, I was just as frustrated. It isn't a clear path of information and the checks may or may not be done by either CIA or FBI.

              And anyway, a background check by the "spooks" is not a good enough answer. Whatever they turn up is probably classified. The FEC really needs to get the documents because they would then be public record and certified by the Feds and the FEC could answer all the subsequent questions. It probably wouldn't stop the "birthers," but could put them back on the fringe where they belong.

              HR 1503 is the legislative mechanism to close the book on this stupid 220 year oversight on eligibility. I know the timing of the bill is suspect and some of the sponsors are very inarticulate on TV, but I find it hard to believe we as a nation wouldn't want to correct an oversight that has always had the potential to cause the shenanigans we are now experiencing.

              I sent an email to Rachel Maddow asking her to cover this part of the story. I'll be happy to send it to anyone else who might want to get at this completely absent part of the story.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 22, 2009 3:01 pm ET)
                   
                I find it hard to believe we as a nation wouldn't want to correct an oversight that has always had the potential to cause the shenanigans we are now experiencing.

                I'm not sure I follow you here, Borealis. What is the "oversight"? The fact that background checks done on elected officials aren't made completely public? That sounds pretty sensible to me.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by borealis (July 22, 2009 5:29 pm ET)
                    1
                  The oversight is not having any agency in charge of requiring the proof of eligibility. For 220 years, we have had only 3 Constitutional requirements of those wanting to run for President and no agency has been designated to verify that each candidate meets them. That seems like an oversight to me.

                  The background checks comments were in reference to magnolialover. The checks won't get us where I would like us to be. I'm not suggesting background checks be made public. I'm suggesting that HR 1503 would give FEC the responsibility for citizenship documents of candidates and that information would be public record.

                  I have hope that the public nature of this process would quiet some of the shenanigans in the future.
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne1 (July 21, 2009 8:44 pm ET)
          6 1
          Another dance....the limbo rock. How low can they go?

          Dang, between the C street party house, the hip hop that Michael Steele keeps going on about AND all of this dancing, I wanna be a gop slopper too.

          Must be the new strategy to attract some new blood under 80 ;-)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 21, 2009 9:11 pm ET)
            5  
            Hey, look, JJ. The drive-by thumbs down guy paid a visit.No comments, no ideas, just a very primitive "Me No Like!!" to almost every post.

            The future of the GOP.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne1 (July 21, 2009 9:24 pm ET)
              5  
              Whenever he/she does that, I go and put a thumbs up on every post that's affected. Just outta spite. I know, very mature, huh?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (July 21, 2009 9:52 pm ET)
                2 1
                Aw guys I just gave you a bunch of thumbs up to counter that drive by thumbs down Con.

                Just cause I like you Colonel

                And I'm sweet on Miz Julia :-)

                Report Abuse
                • Author by juliajayne1 (July 21, 2009 10:12 pm ET)
                     
                  Aw shucks, darling. You're the best. Franks....;-)
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jeter2 (July 21, 2009 10:21 pm ET)
                      1
                    Miz Julia you know I'd do anything for you :-)
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by snoopy (July 21, 2009 11:54 pm ET)
                      1  
                      I'd do anything to her too! Oops, I meant for her...
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by jeter2 (July 22, 2009 8:28 am ET)
                          1
                        Geeze Snoop, you still sniffing around my Miz Julia? I outta whack you on the nose with a newspaper! ;-)

                        Hey man I can't blame ya, she is a very special lady :-)
                        Report Abuse
                • Author by Conchobhar (July 22, 2009 12:06 am ET)
                     
                  Careful with the aspersions, Shortstop. I didn't give anybody a thumbs down.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jeter2 (July 22, 2009 8:29 am ET)
                      1
                    Hey Conchobhar,

                    When I say "Con" it's short for Conservative. So cool down :-)
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Conchobhar (July 22, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
                         
                      I'm cool. But since Con is the name I'm known by, professionally and personally, I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't capitalize the word when talking about conservatives.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by juliajayne1 (July 22, 2009 4:09 pm ET)
                           
                        I thought you were kidding Jeter, because I use con with a Capital C all the time. Always referring to cons and for comedic or derisive effect of course. It never occured to me for a sec that you were being referred to.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Conchobhar (July 23, 2009 4:50 pm ET)
                             
                          I actually was kidding Jeter, but I guess I didn't make that clear. I'm also not really serious in my reply to him. I guess I just need to get the occasional dig in, due to his moniker and icon. My namesake uncle was close friend and legal rep of the Splendid Splinter, so I was born and baptized BoSox.
                          Report Abuse
                • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 22, 2009 1:45 am ET)
                     
                  gee, thanks Jeter. And i was looking for you last weekend to ask how you enjoyed the last Yankee visit to Anahwim, but couldn't find you anywhere.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jeter2 (July 22, 2009 8:31 am ET)
                    1 1
                    You crossed my mind too Colonel, I figured you were enjoying that. Me? I was hiding under a rock.

                    But now that the Yanks are in first place...I'm back !!!
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by Bronwyn (July 22, 2009 5:33 am ET)
            1  
            JJ, don't forget the Old Soft Shoe and the Slide around every important question.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Proud American (July 21, 2009 7:42 pm ET)
        4
      It's amazing how on Chris's birth certificate for Obama it shows his present name and on earlier birth certificates it shows that his first name is Barry. Where is Chris getting his birth certificates, Birth Certificates made to order.
      What about Obama's financial aid as a foreign student. Do we just forget about that too? Show the real birth certificate with a Official State Seal, I have yet to see one with that on it. Just like the US government knowing about the attack on Pearl Harbor a week and a half before it happened and the knowledge of that coming out fifty years later. The attack on the USS Liberty in June of 1967 by the Isreal was finally released thirty years after the event when the Sailors onboard were no longer threaten with death if they told what happened. Of course by the US government. Patriots are letting the Americans know what is really happening without such a long wait. Let's see how long it takes the truth to be recognized by the American citizens about Obama.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 22, 2009 4:37 am ET)
        2  
        Hi ProudAmerican,
        That's good that you're proud of where you were born. Hopefully someday you'll have something that's within your control to be proud of. Like not being totally batshlt crazy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (July 22, 2009 8:37 am ET)
        1  
        First, catch your breath.

        The certificate of live birth, as everyone keeps on telling you, has been certified by Hawaii as being real, and they have also confirmed the real birth certificate which is kept on file, and never released. When you go in to get a "birth certificate" as far as I know, you never get a copy of the real one, you get a certificate of live birth, which is what I have in my personal documents folder at home, as do probably everyone else here who has a copy of his/her birth certificate. If you got a copy of the official birth certificate, the raised seal that is on there wouldn't be there, because, it would be a copy. They're not going to release the real one, because, that's not what is done. It's called keeping your records straight.

        About the Obama financial aid, as normal, you're wrong about that as well. Snopes does a nice job of dismantling the stoopid in their article noted below.

        Snopes and financial aid

        There is no evidence to suggest that FDR knew about the attack on Pearl Harbor a week before it happened. That's just another loony conspiracy theory.

        The USS Liberty attack was not covered up either. The men on board the ship were allowed to talk to whoever they wanted to talk about it with. It was a friedly fire incident, unfortunate and tragic, but not unheard of.

        Am I to believe that folks like yourself are so patriotic that you're trying to bring down the President of the United States with false claims about his citizenship, and where he was born? That's being patriotic alright. Nice work!

        I wish that the truth would be recognized, so kooks like yourself could just go away and stop bothering the adults in the room.




        Report Abuse
        • Author by political_left-religious_right (July 22, 2009 1:00 pm ET)
          1  
          Well done, Mags.

          I would add to PA that "Barry" was a nickname that Obama went under during his youth. It was never his official name, and appears that way on no official documents. PA could never produce the one he says exists.

          As an aside, it seems to me that everyone with "Proud" in his moniker is a Hannity model--extreme right-wing, impossible to reason with, and thinks he has about ninety IQ points more than he really has. Why is that?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (July 22, 2009 1:57 pm ET)
               
            Har ! I've noticed that too,PLRR. All the ones who need to assert in their screen name that they're "Proud" (ironically, mostly Proud Christians who can't even come up with a screen name that avoids all of the deadly Sins) or "American" seem to have the least to be proud of, and seem to be the most at odds with American values.

            I guess it's an insecurity / compensation thing. I also notice that some of the brightest and strongest posters have nicks that are goofy, funny or self-deprecating.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (July 22, 2009 5:26 pm ET)
           
        "It's amazing how on Chris's birth certificate for Obama it shows his present name and on earlier birth certificates it shows that his first name is Barry. Where is Chris getting his birth certificates, Birth Certificates made to order." cattleProd AmeriKKKan

        Hey, it's Prod AmeriKKKan! I missed you over at newshounds {not really.}
        What happened, got tired of getting smacked down over there? Now that their comments are moderated, it just ain't as easy to spread scat -- and I know you just HATE that.

        Anyway, please provide a LINK that shows a birth certificate with the name "Barry" -- as has been pointed out, that was never his legal name.

        Next, explain to us why Obama would need financial aid as a "foreign student", when, at the time he entered Occidental College, he had been back living in the US for eight years . . .
        Report Abuse
    • Author by kimujnr (July 21, 2009 8:00 pm ET)
      1  
      What a coincidence that this issue be brought up after the first african american president is elected! The right has officialy entered the deadzone coz not even God can reach em.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (July 21, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
      4 1
      How in the hell is this even a story??

      If our media were actually our media... this kind of garbage would not be allowed to be mentioned except as a side note to letting us know that the fringe among us are just one more step closer to the white padded room!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by paul8616 (July 21, 2009 9:13 pm ET)
        4  
        What do you mean 'not allowed to be mentioned?'

        Of course we want it to be mentioned in the news! Congress shouldn't be wasting everyone's time and effort by making stupid laws like this, simply to appease a ridiculous constituency who has no grasp on reality. This is exactly the kind of situation for which the Fourth Estate is supposed to exist!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (July 21, 2009 8:31 pm ET)
      4 1
      "This controversy is not new . . . remember, there was questions about John McCain . . . if John McCain had become president, you'd be having this issue on the other side . . .

      "If you wanna go back, people thought that Barry Goldwater was not qualified, because he was born in the Arizona Territory,

      "And that Mitt Romney's father, George Romney, was not eligible to be president, because he was born in Mexico . . ."


      The guy would have a point -- IF Obama were born in a US overseas military zone like the CZ [McCain], a territory [Goldwater], or a foreign nation [Romney Sr.]


      Thing is, he wasn't -- he was born in HAWAII, A U.S. STATE.
      AND THEREIN LIES THE DIFFERENCE, YOU IGNORANT A$$!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (July 22, 2009 8:41 am ET)
        1  
        Thing is, McCain was born on "US Soil" as defined by how and where the military has their jurisdictions around the world, not to mention, he had 2 parents of US citizenship, so there would really be no question about McCain's citizenship, they would be just as stupid as the questions about Obama's.

        Barry Goldwater would have eligible, because in the Constitution there is a grandfather clause in there for folks born in territories, or colonies before we became the United States of America. As in, there were plenty of US Presidents at the start of our run as a country who were technically NOT BORN in the US, since we weren't even a country.

        Mitt Romney's father also would have been OK, because his parents were both American citizens.

        And Obama was born in Hawaii.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bittermarv (July 22, 2009 8:45 pm ET)
             
          Look up United States Citizen on wikipedia. It lays out what the requirements are to be a natural born citizen of the US. Even if Obama had been born in Kenya (or on Mars, for that matter) his mother's citizenship and residency here in the US makes him a citizen.

          The whole "debate" (another one of those debates that isn't really a debate, because the facts are clear) is silly, and Rep. Campbell should be ashamed of himself and laughed out of Congress.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by ObaManure (July 21, 2009 10:12 pm ET)
        8
      Mathews is a LIAR.
      1- Nice try but Constitution requires President ot be NATURAL Born Citizen NOT Native Born Citizen.

      2- That printout that he has is NOT a Birth Certicate, it is a copy of a JPG of that is ONLINE that is NOT valid as a Birth Certificate because there is NO SIGNATURE of the Records Official and no EMBOSSED STAMP. Not only that it is a Certification of Live Birth which was given to FOREIGN born children as well.

      3- Mathews the Pundit has alot to learn from Lou Dobbs who happens to be a journalist and is ethically tryin gto get to the bottom of an issued that is being raised by many americans. he is following the story and trying to find the truth. Mathews is Helping to hide the truth as an accomplice for the Obama Bedmate Media.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (July 22, 2009 8:42 am ET)
        3  
        He's not a liar, in this case, you're just ignorant.

        Obama was born in Hawaii. A State of the United States of America. He is therefore a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

        Get over it, you guys lost.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Lane (July 22, 2009 11:55 am ET)
        2  
        Whenever people capitalize words in the middle of their sentences I always imagine them shouting randomly.

        "...NOOOO SIIIIIGNATUUUURE! of the Records Official and no EMBOOOOOOSSED STAAAAAAAAAAAMP!!!!!"

        Makes me giggle. Use bold.

        But really, ObaManure, head on over to FactCheck, one of the many sites who verified his BC.

        Lou Dobbs... ethical. Haha, that's a good one.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by strikefighter (July 22, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
           
        The signature of the records official is stamped on the back of the printout. And embossed seals are difficult to see in JPEG images. But they are both there.

        And please, please, please explain to me what the difference is, in your mind, between native and natural born. Because in the eyes of the Constitution, they are the same. As others have stated, there is only natural born and naturalized. Obama is clearly the former. Every shred of evidence points to that conclusion. He is the president, duly elected by a majority of the people, thru their electors.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by clo (July 21, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
      1  
      They call it HARDBALL for a reason,
      Chris holds folks accountable & lets them fall on their face.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jlmincey (July 21, 2009 11:21 pm ET)
         
      As much as it kills me to say it, I have to side with the republicans. Now let me just say that I have 0 doubts about Obama's legitamacy and think that this whole thing is completly riddiculus. But to be honest I was surprised that we didn't already do this. Now was this not obviously started because of these people claiming Obama isn't from America? Unfortunately yes, but every cloud has a silver lining I suppose. If this passes then it won't hurt Obama because he has ALREADY shown his birth certificate and it will make sure nothing like this will ever happen again.

      But lets not beat around the bush, if McCain had won no body would be claiming he isn't a citizen like the congressman said. AS disgusting as it is, racism is alive and well in the united states and people think that because he is black must mean he wasn't born in the United States, and it is repulsive.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bittermarv (July 22, 2009 8:50 pm ET)
           
        The vetting process that has evolved in our country for the election of the president is so severe that there's no need for any additional steps. No party of any worth is going to put forth a candidate who does not meet the very clear requirements put forth by the Constitution. And The Press, as lame as it seems at times, would fail to discover any problems so easily discovered -- in the same way that they're not biting at this nonsense about Obama's status.

        You're letting paranoid, partisan whack-jobs cause you worry where there's no reason to be worried.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jlmincey (July 22, 2009 9:39 pm ET)
             
          Oh I'm not worried and of course the democratic party wouldn't put him up unless they were sure. I am just saying to prevent any of this nonsense from coming up again i say go for it.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Scotty Johnson (July 22, 2009 12:31 am ET)
      3  
      Wow. Matthews sometimes drops the ball but he picked it up this time. He cut right to the meat of the matter and sniffed out the real intentions of these whack jobs behind this bill. Well done.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RABBITLUVR (July 22, 2009 10:39 am ET)
         
      I hope the good Congresscritter is putting his resume out there cuz I have this little funny feeling that he may need to search for other work come Nov. 2010.

      Now as far as who would hire someone as stupid and useless as this clown is a whole 'nother issue...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Lane (July 22, 2009 11:58 am ET)
           
        I agree, he'll get canned for this.

        At least he's got a shred of intelligence, however, not agreeing with the "Birthers" and all. That's more than I can say for many republican politicians.
        Report Abuse