Peters changes tune on captured soldier: "I do hope for his family's sake this guy comes back safely"
July 21, 2009 8:53 pm ET
From the July 21 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:
From the July 21 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:


The other right-wing media mogul you should worry about
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles|
|
||
![]() |
||
Now they want more coverage of soldiers and the military? Remember O'Reilly saying something to the effect of "why cover every roadside bomb?"
These people are unreal. Just fricking unreal. Peters would have supported John McCain's murder by his captors in Vietnam.
Now, they're all about, "Why aren't we seeing more coverage of the death and destruction going on in Iraq and Afghanistan?" As if they just woke up, and started caring about it again.
In regards to that, I've seen a constant line about this from liberal journalists, who have been saying consistently that we need more war coverage. That we can't forget about those guys over there, and I agree. Bad, good, indifferent coverage, I'd like to see a whole lot more about what is going on over there.
Thom gave him the floor to apologize then and he wouldn't do it...
Now suddenly he's apologizing? On BillO's puke-fest of a show?
If I'm the family of this soldier I'm demanding this man be fired!
This worthless Lt. Colonel too!!
Bill has always been a hero of mine (I call him Bill because he is such a man of the common people). He has showed his valour over and over again. Sitting in his chair and confronting evil in America. Well, when I say confronting, the people of course are never there with him, that would be danger to Bill's person.
We should look up to Bill and Lt Col Peters as true patriots. They are protecting THEIR America. Whatever that may be? I am sure, given the opportunity, both Bill and Peters would be in Afghanistan, doing their bit for their country too.... Hey, Bill could entertain the troops.
As for the soldier? If you are not born with a senator/congressman or TV reporter as a father, you get all you deserve.
I just wished I lived in their America. I cant seem to find it anywhere......
by archae
2 - Is he actually whining that no investigative journalism is happening while at the same time speaking as if he had facts to badmouth this captured soldier?
3 - I'm sorry, but I didn't see any apology in this clip. This was just more of the same.
Peters' limp, rambling statement was never meant to be a redress, just a (seemingly reluctant) public rejection of summary execution. Of American citizens. Serving overseas. Of course, he then spent the rest of the segment attacking P.F.C. Bergdahl's patriotism and loyalty (without rebuttal), as well as speculating in depth on his possible emotional and mental state. (An aside to Mr. O'Reilly: just a classy, classy job opening the door on those sorts of speculation. Really, it's that sort of insight as an interviewer that must've won you those Peabo... err, Pol... um, never mind.)
Now in my mind, none of this amounted to anything resembling an apology for a number of wildly reckless and idiotic comments; in fact, this seemed like the polar opposite of an apology, almost a justification of those comments. Yes, it's shocking. Yes, it's vulgar. But is it dishonest? That is, did Col.Ralph actually try to pass this garbage as a mea culpa? In fact, he did not. He was not even the focus of the segment:
Ralph Peters is an oily, arrogant, farkuckt excuse for an American, not to mention a human being, and he will avoid admitting any wrongdoing as long as he can. I guarantee that he and his News Corp. compatriots are banking on being their demographic's central source of information; as of my writing this, Fox has yet to directly address Peters' comments. While this attempt to 'control the message' might seem unrealistic considering the outrage his comments have generated, I wouldn't completely rule it out as an effective tactic for saving one's hypocritical political bacon.