Stewart mocks Fox & Friends' criticism of Obama's beer choice
July 31, 2009 7:39 am ET
From the July 30 edition of Comedy Central's The Daily Show with Jon Stewart:


Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular|
|
||
![]() |
||
You are correct though. The fruit used to make shiraz is actually called Syrah and wines made from this continue with that name in France mostly, but in the U.S. we call it "shiraz."
It's also my favorite beer, and I Lou Dobbs is a bad person. In fact, I'll do it if I ever get on his show.
No Jon, there is nothing, absolutely nothing this guy can do that the Right will not criticize. It is the most ridiculous, hypocritical 180 I have ever seen in my life. A year ago the POTUS was infallible and was defended from even the most valid of criticisms from the most credible people. How many "disgruntled" former _________s did they attack, from Powell to Richard Clarke to McClellan to Ray Nagin on and on ad nauseam? Now it doesn't matter how inane the jab is (dijon mustard!?) nor if we are still in Iraq or Afghanistan with troops in harm's way or if Iran and North Korea can still perceive our disunity as weakness, oh hell no. This is Party over country at any costs and it sure doesn't hurt that he also happens to be a colored fella with a funny soundin' name.
Perhaps because it a has faint taste of urine?
But I love many beers, including many American beers.
But it's ridiculous... there's NO beer he could have chosen that would have been the "correct" answer. This is what we've come to? These bimbos criticize him because Bud Light is now owned by a foreign company, suggesting Coors Light instead. If he'd have chosen Coors Light, we may well have heard someone criticizing that because of the racist history of the Coors family.
If I were in his place, and I had chosen Guinness over Bud Light, I'd be criticized for buying an Irish brand over an American one. If I had chosen Bud Light over Guinness, I'd be criticized for choosing a sissy "Light" beer over a hearty, masculine brew like Guinness.
You're right in that he couldn't have chosen a correct beer.
Yes, I do remember that, and did when I was writing my original comment. I suppose I could have added this fact to that sentence, because my point extended further than that example.
My point was that these people who went out of their way to point out that Bud Light is now owned by InBev probably, had Obama chosen any foreign beer over Bud Light, would have complained that he didn't drink an American beer, such as Bud Light. THEN they would conveniently omit the part about InBev.
Since 'profit' is what goes to the HO, but 'wages' are at the factory, which is better for the US?