About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Fair & balanced: Fox & Friends guest-host fearmongers over euthanasia, hosts urge listeners to contact Congress

August 03, 2009 11:10 am ET

From the August 3 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Fox & Friends continues fearmongering, Malkin claims health care reform "puts a discount on the lives of elderly people"

Media echo serial misinformer McCaughey's false end-of-life counseling claim

Limbaugh on "rumor" that "older citizens will just be put out to pasture": "Obamacare plan contains ... end of life"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (August 03, 2009 11:15 am ET)
         
      To call Fox & Friends a Joke is a Compliment.
      To Hurt Obama and Mis-lead America is their true Intent.
      There Goes Steve Doocy with his Patented "Fox Smirk"
      Someday the truth will come out about Doocy and the will be the end of my Work.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (August 03, 2009 11:22 am ET)
      1  
      I for one think that it is important to contact your Congresspeople. But I know how to go directly there, I don't have to get my instuctions from Fox to do it. I also don't think that Fox would like what I would say to them. I support changes to health care, cash for clunkers, and the stimulus, which does seem to be working...and I don't think that tax cuts are the answer to everything.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (August 03, 2009 11:32 am ET)
      2  
      I am really confused by the idea that the Cash for Clunkers was a failure or mismanaged?

      The only failure was that we didn't allocate enough money for it and we underestimated its effectiveness and popularity.

      The purpose of the program was to inject $1 billion of sales help in order to sell 250,000 cars... they thought it would take 3 months... it took one week.

      How is that mismanaged? The program was an outrageous success and the only thing we need to consider is if we want to allocate more money to the program.

      To characterize this as mismanaged or a failure is ridiculous.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by historygeek001 (August 03, 2009 11:45 am ET)
        2  
        Blueline:

        I'm sorry, but you're making too much sense and therefore must be ignored by the Republicans and their mouthpieces at Fox. Facts can't be allowed to get in the way of talking points.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by puppienrainbows (August 03, 2009 11:46 am ET)
        1 1
        The original intent was to remove gas guzzling, inefficient autos from the roadways. The program was a 'success' in that the allocated funds were spent. I haven't seen any numbers that pertain to whether or not there are now fewer emissions and whether the 'bang for the buck' was effective. All we really know is that the allocated funds were spent. period!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by peace4all (August 03, 2009 11:56 am ET)
          1  
          well, the idea is that the dealers are suppoesed to make sure that the car purchased is more fuel efficient than the old clunker. so if thats not occuring then it would be fraud on the dealers part. but it's good to see you would like to see the facts in the way it's being run compared to the actual bill. to bad that so many on the right don't take the same view of healthcare. seems the right is stating all kinds of things that the healthcare bill "might" do, when the final bill is not even close to being completed.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by puppienrainbows (August 03, 2009 12:03 pm ET)
              2
            If there are no measures to ensure the dealers are, in fact, making sure the car being sold is more efficient, considerably more efficient, than the 'trade-in', and there are no reports or numbers indicating the 'success', then the only measure of success I see is that the money was spent and nothing more. If the government is going to spend my money and not provide evidence that fraud and waste are not occurring, then we are back to square one.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (August 03, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
              4  
              What you fail to realize is that it is, and will continue to be a huge success. Why?

              Well, once the dealers have sold off a lot of the inventory that we've had sitting around lots for months on end, this provokes the car makers to inject more cars into the inventory, which means, they can re-start many car assembly facilities that have been shut down on and off over the past year because now, they will have new orders to fill. So this puts people back to work, and pays them for their work, which in turn, could further stimulate the economy.

              Also, along with the assembly plants starting back up, this will also provide the incentive for assembly plants' vendors/suppliers to start making parts again. Again, many of these suppliers have shut down on and off for the past year, with not a lot of demand. More cars being bought = more demand = more people getting back to work = more money being paid = more money being spent in the economy if the United States.

              Also, there are checks in place at the dealers where they need to ensure that the cars being traded in, are less fuel efficient than the ones that they're selling. Therefore, possibly reducing consumption of gas in the US.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by puppienrainbows (August 03, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
                1 1
                I understand economics but the question still remains that the only 'success' to date is that the money was spent. You've made a broad assumption that all of the measures to prevent fraud, which is a common factor when the government hands out money, have been observed. I'd like a detailed analysis of: the number of cars sold via the 'cash for clunkers' program, the types of cars turned in versus the types of cars sold and which states 'benefited' the greatest from the program. With that kind of information, a relatively simple chart can be constructed to weigh the success properly. Until then, all we know is that the government spent 1 billion tax dollars.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by blueline99 (August 03, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
                  3  
                  I agree with you... the presumption is that everything went as planned... but how can these folks call the C.A.R.S program a failure or mismanaged... isn't that irresponsible of the media?

                  Prove to me that there has been mismanagement. The only reports I have heard that some dealers are skittish about the program because there are so many proviso's that they were afraid to enter the program for fear of the $15,000 penalty if they didn't follow the program correctly.

                  This may have been an early argument for why this program would fail because the dealers wouldn't want to participate, but all evidence is to the contrary.

                  And if the dealers did commit fraud and took advantage of the program, as long as there are safeguards preventing these dealers from profiting, then I think the plan is successful.

                  And the fact is that we haven't spent the money yet... only approximately 21,000 car sales have been re-imbursed to dealers.. the rest is in the pipeline... so we haven't spent $1 billion yet.

                  Put to the folks on Fox and Friends, the program failed.
                  Never mind Ford's sales numbers for July
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by puppienrainbows (August 03, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
                      1
                    Everyone here is forgetting that it is tax dollars being spent and are they being spent properly. Supporters cite sales of cars up and all of the projected 'savings' because of the CARS program but the bottom line is 1 billion dollars was/is spent by the government. That 'debt' doesn't just vanish because the government spent it. The projections of gas savings and ultimately the impact on oil imports and the environment look swell on paper, but show me some sales statistics(real ones) concerning the types of cars turned in, the types of cars sold and the states that 'benefited' the most from the program. Many in congress, including democrats, are not willing to extend the program. If it is a monumental success, why the ambivelence? hmmmmm.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by blueline99 (August 03, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
                      2  
                      The ambivalence is that there is an agenda out there, put forth mostly by the right wing, who does not want to see these programs succeed. It goes counter to how they get re-elected.

                      It's the same mind set of the Repubs and Dems who continued to support the F22 plane that nobody wanted and didn't work.

                      The same people who hear that we avoided The Great Depression 2.0 because we bailed out the banks and lowered interest rates but continue to say that we should never have bailed them out. How much more money would it have cost this nation with unemployment at 30%.

                      The House voted to expand this program. The Senate is politicizing it by trying to put the belief out there that this program is mismanaged and bankrupt.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by jbrantow (August 03, 2009 1:27 pm ET)
                     
                  Ford just came out and said this was their busiest July in years. That is called success, you moron.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by puppienrainbows (August 03, 2009 1:38 pm ET)
                       
                    Only around half of the Ford sales were for the CARS program.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by blueline99 (August 03, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
                         
                      The dealerships have been reporting high traffic due to the CARS program... not everyone qualifies for the program, but the dealerships are increasing sales.
                      f
                      It's working... why are people trying to find reasons to call this a failure... I guess it's true... they right truly does want Obama (and this country) to fail!
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by BRETTRIX (August 03, 2009 1:23 pm ET)
                   
                I love magnolias too but I must just ask you one simple question =- what happens in your rosy scenario above when the govt stops handing out billions of dollars to help the auto-market? Do you think that people will still be buying cars at the same pace without the subsidy?

                if you think that they won't keep buying without the incentive - then what happens to all that excess inventory that they created due to the false demand?

                additionally, who do you think should pay for the billions being handed out? the rich people?

                Report Abuse
            • Author by blk-in-alabam (August 03, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
                 
              Rush Limbaugh said today cash for clunkers is the way a government program is supposed to work.He called it a tax cut
              Report Abuse
        • Author by blueline99 (August 03, 2009 1:13 pm ET)
          1  
          btw... conservatively... each car turned in is a 10 mpg improvement, this figures to be just over 700 gallons of gas over the next 3 years (assuming 12,000 miles a year, like car leases do).

          That's 178.5 million gallons of gas saved.
          Or for those financial minded, that's roughly 4.25 million barrels of oil.
          At $75/barrell that's $318 million in less oil imports.
          If oil prices go up to $110/barrel that would be $467.7 million.

          From a stimulus perspective, if we assume that each car sold is $20,000, that's $5 billion dollars of sales. In that money is auto loans, sales tax, registration taxes, etc..
          Report Abuse
          • Author by blueline99 (August 03, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
            1  
            actually now that I look at these numbers... I should probably do what the Right Wing media does... distort to advance their cause.

            If everyone turned in their 12MPG POS and bought a 40MPG Hybrid and drove 20,000 Miles a year like I do.

            They would save 875 million gallons of gas
            20.8 million barrels of oil
            At $145/barrel (peak price) that's $3.02 Billion

            This program is going to save this country $3 Billion over the next 3 years in oil imports.... how's that for Right Wing math!

            Report Abuse
        • Author by jbrantow (August 03, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
          1  
          This program lead to the busiest weekend for sales at auto dealers across the country. That's dollars spent, cars sold and now the need for more cars to replenish the sold out stock. That's what a stimulus does...it creates sales and thus later increases the need for employees. What part of that logic do you find so difficult to understand?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by puppienrainbows (August 03, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
              2
            Did you factor in the 1 billion tax dollars spent? Most of the people who took advantage of the program had to borrow money to get the new car. How many of those will be able to keep up with the payments? Supporters of the program measure the 'success' by a simplistic yardstick. "the Obama administration said it was a success". The simpleton 'logic' citing sales projections and the 3rd grade economics used to defend the program don't take into account all of the factors that can affect the success or failure of the program. Blueline99 states a 'conservative 10mpg improvement' from each car and then goes on to extrapolate numbers from that starting point! Sounds real good but I've seen too many government programs that from the git-go sound good but once implemented are not so good, 1 or 2 years down the road. The CARS program cannot be ruled a success until all results are in and that's a long way away! BTW, I can guarantee you, there was not an average 10mpg savings from the old car to the new one. That figure is way outa line!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by blueline99 (August 03, 2009 3:46 pm ET)
              1  
              The rules of CARS is that in order to get the full $4,500 allowance, the differential between the MPG of the old and new must be 10MPG or higher. The differential must be at least 4 to qualify for the $3,500.

              Based on that Information puppy... can you guarantee it?
              For every Prius that was purchased in this program (45MPG or 27MPG improvement) would offset almost 7 minimum improvement (18MPG to 22MPG)... so how confident are you on that assertion that you can guarantee that 10MPG average is way off based? Do the math and get back to me.

              So even if the majority of the cars are not 10MPG or higher, than the number of cars that this program helped purchase will be more than 250,000. Either way... the more cars with poor fuel efficiency gets traded in for better, is better for or oil independence.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by boohooliberals (August 03, 2009 3:05 pm ET)
            1
          The Dems are good at spending money so if that is the measure than it must have been a success. We should spend our way out of debt...China appreciates it.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (August 03, 2009 11:46 am ET)
        3  
        I agree. It was a huge success.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (August 03, 2009 11:47 am ET)
      2  
      Yes. Please call your Congressman. So that their office can tell you what an idiot you are to think that the health care bill calls for euthenasia. Morons.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by boohooliberals (August 03, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
        1
      Reporting on this is a joke. If you have a problem with the actions of your government you should contact your representatives. Just because you dont believe this is the appropriate reason to contact your representatives doesnt make it wrong. It seems that the goals and objectives of Media Matters on the About Us page seem more "scientific" to counter misinformation when in reality it appears your only goal is to spread your own opinion based reporting. I will be surprised if your are objective enough to allow my postings.... I guess we will see.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MrBrown (August 03, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
         
      Saw this guy this morning. I dont know why it constantly amazes me that these people can make statements like this with a straight face...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jbrantow (August 03, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
         
      These idiots in the audience (the hosts are imbeciles as they prove every am) are planted there......sent by lobbiest groups to disrupt and kill healtcare reform.. Think Teabaggers.


      the GOP will stop at nothing to protect their dollars from lobbiests and to crap on the american citizens.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (August 03, 2009 11:07 pm ET)
         
      HSS?
      Report Abuse