About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck: "[I]t is not time to pick up guns" or "blow anything up"

He adds: "But it is time to stand up. ... The question is: Which side will win?"

August 05, 2009 11:00 am ET

From the August 5 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by harley (August 05, 2009 11:05 am ET)
      5  
      Your myopic and terrorism-loving audience is not listening to you, Becky:
      Prez Obama faces an increase of 400% in death threats a day

      Glenn Beck Fan, Highly Armed, Busted For Casing National Guard Base, Thinking It Was A "FEMA Camp"


      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (August 05, 2009 11:32 am ET)
        3 1
        Another mass shooting just outside of Pittsburgh,
        Once again, it seems that this nut has a blog and has notations, racial about Obama back in November just after the election.
        I'll look for the website.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (August 05, 2009 11:42 am ET)
             
          Web Diary Details Shooter’s Frustration
          Report Abuse
        • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 11:57 am ET)
          3 6
          This guy was rejected by women his whole life and was after his ex. Don't inject politics into it. Are the terrorist attacks over seas because of Glenn Beck too? Do you think Osama Bin Laden listens to him on his potato powered radio?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
            3  
            Riiiight... I mean, NEVER inject politics into anything when the villain is conservtaive, right?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by puppienrainbows (August 05, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
                9
              who said he was conservative. He sounded like a looney lefty loser.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by RABBITLUVR (August 05, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
                   
                His politics had zip to do with what he did. He wasn't an Adkisson.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by harley (August 05, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
                2  
                He sounded like a looney lefty loser.
                Wrong. He believed in a "liberal media". His exact words: "The liberal media LOVES him. Amerika has chosen The Black Man.!". He's no different than YOU! He's a racist and murdering teabagging terrorist. Puppy = Pwned
                Report Abuse
                • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
                    1
                  America has chosen the black man. That's awesome. Aren't you happy for that? I think it speaks a lot for the American people. Obama would not have been elected if it were only black vs. white. It's time to stop with the name calling and truly work together for peace.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
                       
                    Typical conservative tactic. Start looking stupid, losing the argument, defending the indefensible, so they quickly change the subject, twistign something that someone said, totally out of the blue and off topic.

                    DUDE: The "loony" was a conservative. A right-winger. And a racsist. Period.

                    Don't think changing teh subject is goign to fool anyone.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 12:48 pm ET)
                        2
                      Noooo...Someone starts calling me a racist and a terrorist simply because I have different political views as they do and I feel the need to defend myself. Glenn Beck understands the outrage over bigger government so he feels the need to tell his viewers not to do anything crazy. It's the same outrage liberals have been feeling for over 8 years. We have a common viewpoint and it is that government shouldn't have too much control. They abuse it as can be seen with George Bush.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 2:31 pm ET)
                        2  
                        Fair enough, Harley may have gone too far is aying [this nut's] "just like you." But I still think you're being rather disingenuous to say that Glenn Beck merely "understands" the outrage. He's been one of the primary MOTIVATORS and PURVEYORS of this outrage, and the propaganda that fuels it. And since it is fueled more by misinformation and propaganda that actual facts, this is completely different from the "outrage" that "liberals felt for the past eight years." That outrage was based on thing that were ACTUALLY HAPPENING. The current outrage over "big gov't" is not only misplaced (as W. oversaw the boiggest expansion of gov't in history) but sadly misinformed if they think that BIG CORPORATIONS are any more benevolent than "big gov't."
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 2:54 pm ET)
                            2
                          Good point. Under that "biggest expansion of govt in history" we now have one of the deepest recessions in history. How is growing the government even more going to solve this? Of course big business can't be trusted. But, why do some of the biggest businesses, medicine companies, want this to go through so badly? Why have the biggest companies been given bailouts? How can we trust an administration who scolds big business one minute and turns around and gives them our money the next? http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Daily-Reports/2009/August/04/Tuesday-Lobbying.aspx
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by foghornleghorn (August 05, 2009 3:23 pm ET)
                               
                            Here's an economics lesson, free of charge:

                            In this recession, the general public had no money to keep our consumer-driven economy going. The only entity with the money to spend is the government.

                            Yes there's additional debt but I'm guessing you'd rather have a full-blown depression with companies failing right and left.

                            I've got a bumber sticker for you:

                            LET 'EM FAIL
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 3:36 pm ET)
                                1
                              Oh and P.S. the government doesn't have any money either. China does. That's why were trillions in debt.
                              Report Abuse
                          • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 3:25 pm ET)
                            1  
                            There is no wisdom inherent in trusting NO ONE.

                            If you have specific concerns with anything in this legislation, then by all means spell them out. Just saying "big gov't" ain't gonna fly. Big Gov't under Bush didn't CAUSE the recession, and I'm not going to crticise him on that alone. (I only bring it up becuase that seems to be the firts thing you guys say about BHO, forgetting that both GWB and RWR both expanded the gov't considerably in their admin's. So I'm just calling you out, that's all.) So let's stop with the whole gov't=bad nonsense.

                            Everyone on our side has been clear on what we don't like about the current system, and I'm sure you've heard the argument ad nauseum, so I'm not going to repeat them here. But you'll need to do more that raise "scary questions" about "big pharma" and invoke "big gov't." If you have specific concerns, by all means LET US KNOW WHAT THEY ARE.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 3:35 pm ET)
                                1
                              There is plenty of wisdom in not trusting the government. The ones in power make laws that further their own agenda. That's the way it is. Trying to keep as much of our own freedom as possible is not a stupid ideal to have. The founders did not trust the government either. This country was founded on the idea that government is a necessary evil that should be hedged and kept under control of "the people".
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 3:53 pm ET)
                                   
                                Blah...Blah...Blah...

                                And you also stated that you don't trust corporations either. So we're back to "TRUST NO ONE." And there's no wisdom in that, becuase if you trust no one, then nothing will ever get done.

                                You still haven't stated what you think is so terrible about what they're proposing other that to raise the spectre of "spooky big gov't" again. They answer to us. The founding fathers (as you point out) saw to that. Doing what we want is, and doing stuff that works, is still the easiest way for them to keep their jobs. And the fact is that most of america wants this, and all of america is getting screwed by the current system - and by DESIGN, not EXCEPTION. A good screwing is the only outcome that can be expected frop the current system.

                                SO... 3rd or 4th time now...: WHAT IS YOUR SPECIFIC PROBLEM WITH THE LEGISLATION AS IT STANDS?
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 4:05 pm ET)
                                    1
                                  My problem is government run healthcare. If the health care system needs reform, then reform it. We don't need a government run option. There is already Medicare and Medicaide/SCHIPS for that. When they propose a solution that will bring down costs I will probably be on board. If there is a problem with out of control costs, then why doesn't anyone have a problem with the fact that every report shows this plan will not drive down costs but will instead actually end up costing more?
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
                                      1
                                    read this

                                    http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_33/b3997089.htm
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 6:47 pm ET)
                                      1  
                                      What's your point? It shows everything that's wrong with the current system. Well... ALMOST everything...

                                      It leaves out the BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars in PROFIT that insures make - all money that's 100% WASTED relative to providing me health care. Why should I pay THEM that much? Not to mention that $20+ Million dollar salaries that are paid to ins. co. top exec's even BEFORE that profit is figured! Why should they get so much, just for denying me coverage?!

                                      You con's make it so easy. Your "evidence" doesn't even support your point. Or is your point that we SHOULD be denying people care? In that case why do you use that as a CRITICISM of the proposed legislation? (Not that the legislation would anythign of the sort, but y'all keep saying it will, as if you think that's a BAD THING.) Come back once you get some consistancy.
                                      Report Abuse
                                  • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 4:19 pm ET)
                                    1  
                                    Costing WHO more? And HOW? Sure - it will cost more NOW, as we will continue to pay premiums on top of the extra taxes needed to cover the uninsured. But if the gov't provided ALL health care, and the extra taxes were being paid IN LIEU of premiums, it would cost less for 98+% of private citizens - esp those paying for their own insuracne w/o employer help - and would even cost most corporations less, since any increase in corprate taxes woudl only be paid by those making money. Those having tough years OTOH would no longer be crippled by their FIXED health care costs. But we can't take it that far, becuase for some reason we're still trying to appease the right and their soporate buddies. The worst thing about this bill is everything that's been done to satisfy people like YOU.

                                    You offer nothing but "gov't=bad" and "there's no real problem." You got nothin'. Bad information and no ideas. You MUST be a conservative.
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 4:27 pm ET)
                                        3
                                      Yeah. I'm a conservative. I believe in the free market economy and that competition is a good thing when your health is involved. Right now people have a choice which hospital they want to go to. If everyone is going to get paid no matter what, why would they try harder to be the best and compete with the next guy. Government programs beget complacency and quality suffers. Ever heard of a VA hospital?
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
                                          2
                                        In a recent Rasmussen telephone survey released Monday, 48 per cent of respondents rate the United States health care system as either good or excellent, while 19 percent rate it as poor. This is a huge increase from May when 35 per cent of U.S. respondents rated their health care system as either good or excellent.
                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 6:34 pm ET)
                                          1  
                                          RE: Your Rassmussen poll...

                                          Congratulations. Your lot's campaign of misinformation and propaganda is working. You must be pround to have been able to misinform so many so thouroughly in so little time.

                                          RE: Free market (con't)

                                          I too believe in the free market for most things. But, having aced graduate level econ (both micro and macro) and earned my MBA, with honors, I also knwo HOW and WHY the free market works so well in almost every case. But knowing and understanding it as thouroughly and deeply as I do, I also know WHEN it doesn't work, can't work really, and WHY. And health care is one of those areas where the free amrket can't possibly do what any rational person would want it to.
                                          Report Abuse
                                      • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 6:29 pm ET)
                                        1  
                                        You have a warped sense of both competition and how markets function. The fact is that hospitals already "get paid no matter what", and most have LTA's with insurance co's which dictate where you end up going, as you will have the least OOP expense with one of them. These LTA's are anot based on service levels, or even quality but rather on who will agree to charge the big insurance co. (and their customers) less. Qualityof care is a COST in teh current system, and one with little benefit for the hospital. If everyone was covered, and under the same plan, with none of the disfunctional LTA's that exsist now, THEN hospitals would be competeing based on quality of care, espiecially if NONE of them would cost the customer (you & me) anything OOP. Then we'd chose the BEST and not just the CHEPAEST.

                                        Non-profit hospitals and universal coverage is the only way to unsure the GOOD kind of competition that you refer to. The current system only encourages COST and QUANTITY competition, not QUALITY.
                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by foghornleghorn (August 05, 2009 7:15 pm ET)
                                          1  
                                          Eddie - keep it simple when dealing with these idiotic health care deniers:

                                          PROFITS OVER PEOPLE

                                          That's their philosophy in a nutshell. It amazes me the people who defend health care profits when it has produced an expensive,inefficient, and, to some, deadly system.
                                          Report Abuse
                • Author by puppienrainbows (August 05, 2009 12:38 pm ET)
                    3
                  Thank you, Scott, but seeing how you shape-shift from 'Harley' to 'Scott Johnson' to 'Harley', so on and so forth, I give little credence to what you have to say.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by harley (August 05, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
            3  
            Don't inject politics into it.
            He injected politics in his web diary. Sorry. It's on the table. Deal with it.


            Are the terrorist attacks over seas because of Glenn Beck too? Do you think Osama Bin Laden listens to him on his potato powered radio?
            You teabagging terrorists claimed OBL was listening to American media when someone dared criticize herr dubyah during his facade of war. Please don't make this so easy in the future.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
                2
              You do realize that Glenn Beck is against George W. Bush for his progressive bailouts and lack of border control, right?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by conservtheconst (August 05, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
                2
              You do realize that Glenn Beck is against George W. Bush for his progressive bailouts and lack of border control, right?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 12:42 pm ET)
                2  
                Yeah, therefore I'm sure he cast his votes for Gore and Kerry, right? Your not "against" George Bush if you didn't like him because he wasn't far enough to the right. That just me you a BIGGER part of the problem.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (August 05, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
                   
                Listen very carefully . . . Glenn Beck is simply a very highly paid ENTERTAINER. Why on earth do you take what he says as gospel? He not only is simply a very highly paid ENTERTAINER, he has a very limited educational background. He dropped out of high school and calls himself a "self-educated" man. His schtick is to yell, cry and say the things that his fans want him to say.

                Doesn't mean that he believes ANY of the nonsense he's spewing, just means that YOU do and he's rolling in the dough, laughing at all of you poor folks who believe him.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Who's paying him?
                  - REPUBLICAN backers and CONSERVATIVE interests.

                  Who's watching him?
                  - White people who vote republican, for any number of reasons, but primarilily because they are easily influence by "entertainers" like Glenn Beck. (And they very rich - they get a pass on this one issue alone.)

                  So who benefits?
                  - The VERY RICH who pay him and who beenfit for the policies enacted by the party that benefits from his influencing the masses. (IOW - REPUBLICNAS.)

                  Who's Hhrt by it?

                  - The other 98% of America, both the Democrats voting to fix this mess, and the Rpeublincas who have been duped by people like Beck into thinking that it can only get worse if we try to do ANYTHING AT ALL, when in fact it is only people like Beck who will pay more, but they'r rather keep some mroe of their millions while everyone who actually WORKS for a living continues to participate in the on-going eugenics project that is privatised health care.

                  So what's your point? Oh yeah - you got nothin'. We take him seriously because he DOES REAL DAMAGE. Because he and his ilk are DANGEROUS. That's why. If you can't see that, say hi to MRS. Ostrich for me when you get home tonight.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by dave (August 05, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
                   
                yes, it was a stupid thing to do.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by bandofotters (August 05, 2009 12:19 pm ET)
             
          So we can blame Obama for another shooting incident? We blame the gun! we might as well blame every enabling factor, right?

          Obama kills! The web kills! Glenn Beck made him do it!

          I for one blame the shooter. Are you with me?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Bad News (August 05, 2009 11:05 am ET)
      3  
      Glen Beck, He Gins up the Hate, then he tries to tap it Down.
      I wonder if he made this statement without his Patented Frown.
      Mr. Beck is a Joke to everyone except Fox News.
      To Fox Mr. Beck is the one that pays all their Corporate Dues.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
      • Author by taliesin (August 05, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
           
        A joke to everyone on the netorks that lose in the ratings everyday
        by staggering numbers.

        Speak Truth to Yourself.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by christopher howard (August 05, 2009 11:11 am ET)
      4  
      Don't worry, wingnuts. Beck will tell you when to blow things up. Beck sycophant Nancy Genovese just jumped the gun a little.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 05, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
           
        I think that why he's been dialing it back in recent days...

        It seems that someone over at Fox said, "Good job Glenn... But maybe a little too good. Please read over this legal memo delineatingn when free speech crosses the line into solicitation."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (August 05, 2009 11:12 am ET)
      1  
      Gigantic global corporations? Is that what you're ranting against right at the end there?

      Folks, it's just barely possible that Beck is saying you're either for democracy and the Constitution, or you're in favor of letting massive insurance companies run your life.

      Go back. Listen carefully. Seriously.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by christopher howard (August 05, 2009 11:30 am ET)
        3  
        Yeah, I noticed that too. Beck's pulling down something in the area of $18 million a year for a multi-national media conglomeratea, and we're supposed to take him seriously as the tribune of the little people fighting the hegemony of the multi-nationals? More false populism coming from a corporate schill who doesn't give a damn about the plebes he's misleading.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by taliesin (August 05, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
            2
          This is the typical "attack the messenger" tactics. You cant refute the substance of what he is saying so you create a strawman of his
          salary and attack that. Pathetic.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dmhack (August 05, 2009 11:12 am ET)
      2  
      "We are sick of being taxed into oblivion!"

      These words from the millionaire to his faithful audience of retires and under-paid workers just trying to get by each month.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (August 05, 2009 11:16 am ET)
      3  
      Your little clarifications come too little, too late, Becky. While collecting your fat paychecks, you've been making gun-loving Joe Sixpack feel isolated, disenfranchised, ripped off, and hunted by the government. You've been telling Joe to "stand up" because "they are coming after" him, his guns, his money, his health care and his rights. You've already made your little bed of insurrection, Becky, now you have to lie in it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (August 05, 2009 11:22 am ET)
      2  
      This is worrisome.

      For Beck to keep bringing this up recently means that he must have been given intel that his minions are planning something ...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (August 05, 2009 11:23 am ET)
      4  
      I'll stand up and say it Glenn! You are a liar! You are shamelessly shilling for your book! You are the traitor! You work for a giant corporation that stiffles freedom! Changes in paradigms are euphemisms for revolutions. Some revolutions are good, others are not. The revolution in 1776 was good. Your Mormon inspired, WASP paradise of anarchistic theocracy isn't. I've done my homework! It is time that someone surround you, and put you away before you hurt anyone.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by puppienrainbows (August 05, 2009 11:55 am ET)
        1 10
        I'm with ya Glenn. Time to lock and load.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (August 05, 2009 12:03 pm ET)
          7  
          And also time to report you to the FBI as a potential domestic terrorist...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by puppienrainbows (August 05, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
            2 11
            That's a good Obama lemming. I'm sure you have neighbors and family members you can report to the brown-shirts. Rahm will send you a signed certificate you can hang on your empty wall.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (August 05, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
              5  
              The Nazi references never get old, do they? That's a good Beck lemming.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by RABBITLUVR (August 05, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
                2  
                Seems to follow Whorely Taitz too...
                Report Abuse
              • Author by taliesin (August 05, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
                  4
                Study the nazis, you'll fnd that they were creatures of the political LEFT. They were advocating total government control
                in Germman society. The right in this country are for limiting
                the power of government.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by friedbergboy1422 (August 05, 2009 2:42 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Except when they expand domestic spying programs and nominate justices who believe in a unitary executive theory and call anyone in opposition to them, "anti-American" and call out the media for urging on the terrorists.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by epkklk851 (August 05, 2009 3:07 pm ET)
                  2  
                  That seems to be the latest bit of revisionist history going around, but it doesn't make the Nazis any less creatures of the Righteous Right. The right in this country seek to limit the role of government in business and gun ownership, but they have no problem with forcing greater restrictions onto the personal liberties of self-expression and social conduct. The Nazis came to power on the slogan of Hearth, Church and Children, which sounds a lot like "Family Values/Judeo-Christian Values" to me. The Nazis also believe in German Exceptionalism, and many of the Right are now touting American Exceptionalism.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by epkklk851 (August 05, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
              6  
              You do realize that advocating the violent overthrow of the government is TREASON and is not protected speech, don't you? And your use of Nazi imagery about a Jew is just too offensive for words! Treason and sedition are not acts of love for the government or the Constitution. It makes you a traitor, not a patriot.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by harley (August 05, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
              4  
              That's a good Becky lemming. I'm sure you have neighbors and family members you can report to the KKK. O'Racist will send you a signed certificate you can hang on your empty wall.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (August 05, 2009 1:13 pm ET)
              1  
              Yes, of course, headinrainbows--head shots, head shots, because they wear body armor--oops, wait a minute. That was G. Gordon Liddy. One of your heroes, I'm sure. What was that I was saying about you being a domestic terrorist? I'd say that MMfA has perfectly legitimate grounds to run your IP and have the FBI find out if you really are "locking and loading"...
              Report Abuse
        • Author by RABBITLUVR (August 05, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
          1  
          You're nuttier than Sodini.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (August 05, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
          4  
          Thanks for proving you are another terrorist teabagger. Loser
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (August 05, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
             
          You do know that Beck doesn't believe this stuff, right? He is an entertainer who makes money saying hateful things that hateful folks like you want to believe. He's laughing at you . . . all the way to the bank.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bandofotters (August 05, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
           
        Here we go! using the "L" word without supplying an example of a lie.

        I keep forgetting that the new definition of a "lie" is anything that the listener does not like hearing or is anything that contradicts one's feelings.

        It was fun reading (elsewhere) about Mr. Beck's mis-statement that the U.S. was the only country that automatically granted citizenship to a newborn. Anyone got anything a bit more substantive?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotshark (August 05, 2009 11:26 am ET)
         
      Well you can back off Beck but you own the problem if some thing should happen you are as close to exciting it as the loony doing the trigger pulling.

      So sad you are just a complete moron fool and a waste of space here on the planet!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (August 05, 2009 11:33 am ET)
      1  
      Wink wink.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pecst1 (August 05, 2009 11:44 am ET)
      2  
      I know many say this, but this guy scares the hell out of me. This has nothing to do with political agreements or disagreements. If this guy was advocating for ice cream and using this same style and vocabulary, you would never get me to buy another pint. The pointed inflection of certain words, the under current of anger, the call to action of "believe in something..even if it's wrong, believe in it.", as he has said on his show, makes my blood run cold.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (August 05, 2009 11:58 am ET)
      3  
      [i]Beck: "t is not time to pick up guns" or "blow anything up"


      He said . . . with fingers crossed behind his back . . .
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lizinbklyn (August 05, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
         
      "NOW" is not the time to pick up guns, etc. . .

      Do his viewers have to wait for 'the call' to lock and load?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by New2politics (August 05, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
      1  
      This is pure hate! If Glenny hates our country so much he should
      just leave.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oldboy26 (August 05, 2009 12:19 pm ET)
      1  
      is it just me or is the comparison of an average american to a third world dictator being able to come to the US for health care a bit disingenuous?? first most dictators are loaded with financial resources that their average citizens could not even dream of and with that own luxurious palaces and access to the world's best of anything. last time i checked i doubt some dictator has a blue cross blue shield insurance plan as most of them have their own doctor or the best hospital access ever. Now if you can make the argument that any average third world country citizen who can manage to afford a plane ticket to the US can still have access to the same quality of care as a dictator without the same financial resources then you have a case. The current system is skewed to those with financial means and the rest of us just hope we dont get sick too much for it to cost us everything. Glenn Beck you need to find a different job but i think you might not be good at anything else but lying and making stuff up since simple logic is too difficult for you to comprehend.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seeryer (August 05, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
        1
      Glenn,
      I got news for you. When you think it finally is time some of us will be waiting with our sights on YOU!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mike509 (August 05, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
      2  
      It sounds like he is insinuating that at some point it will be time to pick up guns and blow things up. That's scary!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TheDayV (August 05, 2009 1:01 pm ET)
      1  
      Best part of this is Botswana, the place where dictators come from, according to Beck, is one of the most stable democracies in the entire African continent and has been since before it gained independence.

      Two things of interest though; Beck counts on his listeners not knowing that (probably cause he doesn't know himself) and maybe, just maybe, Beck's listeners are more or less open to the concept of an African dictator.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by switchblade (August 05, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
         
      The only reason I'm in favor of this guy being allow to own a gun is on the off-chance he will shot himself. I'm sure he would wet his dipers if he ever had to use it to protect himself.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (August 05, 2009 3:06 pm ET)
      1  
      Beckie is suggesting going to a 'socialist' LIBRARY? Instead of BUYING "Common Sense"? (HIS CS, not the original)

      News Report: Commentator Glenn Beck was found dead in the middle of the street today. Police noted there were no indication that whoever hit Beck did not brake before colliding with him, in fact, apparently several vehicles deliberately swerved to hit him. It is estimated that at leave five vehicles collided with Beck, who was apparently standing in the middle of the street.



      Report Abuse