About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Kilmeade claims Pelosi called "average Americans who show up at town halls un-American"

He later asks if Messina's reported comments about "punch[ing] back twice as hard" was "playing to some of the violence that we're seeing at these events"

August 11, 2009 8:11 am ET

From the August 11 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Carlson, Doocy falsely claim Pelosi called health reform opponents "un-American"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by harley (August 11, 2009 8:23 am ET)
      5 2
      They are NOT "average Americans" and to be precise, they are anti-America and anti-democracy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by harley (August 11, 2009 11:33 am ET)
        1  
        Only teabagging hicks would consider these losers "Average Americans"

        [http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/dnc.jpg]
        Protests At Cardin Town Hall Feature AFP Booth, ‘Death Panel’ Warnings, And Obama-Hitler Signs

        Rep. Scott’s office vandalized with four-foot swastika.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by aphelion (August 11, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
          2
        Hillary Clinton once proclaimed that it was patriotic to debate the policies of the Bush administration with respect to Iraq. Why is any less patriotic to debate Obama's health care legislation? Are there idiots that are attending some of the town hall meetings? Absolutely. But why is it wrong or unpatriotic to debate health care legislation that, by the admission of many US Representatives, has not even been read by them. Why the rush to pass health care? Every Representative should read and understand the legislation that they are signing into law! How could anyone suggest otherwise? BTW - I always get a kick out of the misinformed and poorly educated. Despite what YOU may believe, we are actually a Republic. Something quite different from a Democracy. Do your homework Harley.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (August 11, 2009 3:38 pm ET)
          1  
          It's not unpatriotic to debate the issue. This is exactly the distinction that Pelosi made. Debate is fine, attempts to shout down the opposition is not.

          A republic is a form of democracy, namely a representative one. You may be thinking of "direct" or "pure" democracy.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (August 11, 2009 8:23 am ET)
      2  
      The remarkable arrogance that I see is the willingness of Conservatives to look the camera straight in the eye and lie, and lie again, and again, and not expect to get caught. Average Americans aren't un-American, but if you go to a town hall with expressed purpose of shouting down the presenter and anyone else who opposes your view, you are not allowing debate or discussion and you are being a bully. That is un-American, as it violates a tradition of fairplay. That is the real thuggery.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (August 11, 2009 9:51 am ET)
        1  
        One reason they know they can get away with lying, mischaracterizing, etc., is because they know they have a refuge from accountability around every corner - Fox News, National Review, conservative radio... Not only will they not be questioned about their lies, but they'll be supported in them, and even prompted for them. The risk of being called out for lying is hedged by the willingness of the press to present the lie as a viable opinion, by opening up debate of the analysis without any fact-checking. And the liars know that the public attention span will end long before they tire out.

        I remember when "spin" used to mean twisting the analysis of the facts to fit your rhetoric. We're in an age now where they don't even bother with the facts any more.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bip84124092 (August 11, 2009 10:39 am ET)
        1  
        This is the second day Joe Scarborough repeated the "un-American" lie. Today he added "union members are hitting people". Yesterday Mika tried to tell him that it wasn't true and he talked over her. Today she shook her head in agreement. I guess she was reprimanded. Why is he not added to the list of bold face liars especially because he's on MSNBC and not FOX. It's bad enough the Dem guests just sit there saying nothing.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (August 11, 2009 8:25 am ET)
      2  
      Pelosi did not actually accuse opponents of being neo-Nazis; that’s just the way Limbaugh and others chose to interpret her phrase, "carrying swastikas and symbols like that." It is clear from the images in hand that the anti-Obama protesters were the ones accusing others of Nazi-like tendencies. And Pelosi turns out to be right.

      Source: The FactCheck Wire
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (August 11, 2009 10:21 am ET)
          6
        I'm sorry, but your link is supposed to show PROOF of TH attendees carrying swastikas. Notice the lady (the host even points it out) in the pic has a NO-swastika symbol. You know a circle with a line through it. As in NO-Nazi's. If neo-nazis were present as Granny Pelosi insinuated then it would be swastikas on armbands and signs as in PRO-Nazi.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by twseattle (August 11, 2009 10:53 am ET)
             
          And what, pray tell, nazi's would would those signs be referring to?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (August 11, 2009 11:33 am ET)
          1  
          [http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/dnc.jpg]
          Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (August 11, 2009 11:35 am ET)
          1  
          Go figure, tslickens is wrong:

          [http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/swastikas.jpg]

          Do you ever get sick of looking the part of the fool?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by cArn (August 11, 2009 11:38 am ET)
          4  
          I'm sorry, but your link is supposed to show PROOF of TH attendees carrying swastikas.

          No. The link is meant to provide context for Pelosi's comments; she wasn't accusing people of being neo-Nazis, but showing that they were doing it themselves. That's what the statement "It is clear from the images in hand that the anti-Obama protesters were the ones accusing others of Nazi-like tendencies. And Pelosi turns out to be right." means.

          Your reading comprehension doesn't change that fact.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (August 11, 2009 12:00 pm ET)
             
          Yeah, reichpublicans never toss out the nazi symbol when referring to democrats...

          Rep. Scott’s office vandalized with four-foot swastika.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (August 11, 2009 8:34 am ET)
      2  
      The lie predictably expands in scope. This goes beyond the dishonest argument of "What you said was stupid; therefore I'm implying that you are stupid". Pelosi specified the actions she was talking about, clear as day. That does not apply to the "average" person who shows up.

      And how does a reported comment made to Senators have any bearing on anyone's actions? It wasn't a public statement. If it wasn't reported, then nobody besides the Senators would have heard it. But right-wingers are acting as if it was said with the intent of escalating violence or something.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (August 11, 2009 8:37 am ET)
         
      Not true.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seeryer (August 11, 2009 8:44 am ET)
      1  
      Just when I think Kilmeade could not be any dumber......he goes and totally redeems himself.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (August 11, 2009 8:51 am ET)
      3  
      Look, there's plenty of hypocrisy to go around... it's just that most media coverage of this identifies the hypocrisy and frames these attacks on both sides, while the right seems to have amnesia towards the same thing that was happening in 2003 when the roles were reversed.

      Also, I don't accept the premise to the state of the meaning of "Hit back twice as hard." I think the Republicans and Fox are projecting a bit there. I think they are referring to not just the townhall mobs, but more specifically the lies being perpetrated by the right.

      1. Death Panels
      2. Euthanize the elderly
      3. Millions of Americans losing their insurance
      4. Obama-care
      5. Nazi comparisons

      There's more, but it's early and I can't remember them all, but Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow called them out last night quite well.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (August 11, 2009 9:11 am ET)
        3  
        Agreed. If the "mainstream" media outlets would also call the Republicans out for their lies, this thing might be brought under control. Unfortunately, the Corporate Lapdogs in the press would rather just sit back and pretend that this is some kind of spontaneous "grassroots" movement, instead of the deliberately fabricated outrage that it clearly is.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (August 11, 2009 9:13 am ET)
        1  
        blueline99:

        http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090806/pl_politico/25891

        "They showed video clips of the confrontational town halls that have dominated the media coverage, and told senators to do more prep work than usual for their public meetings by making sure their own supporters turn out, senators and aides said.

        And they screened TV ads and reviewed the various campaigns by critics of the Democratic plan.

        “If you get hit, we will punch back twice as hard,” Messina said, according to an official who attended the meeting.

        The hourlong session was the last opportunity for Democratic leaders and the White House to prepare senators for what will be a crucial month in shaping public opinion on health care."


        Here is an article from Yahoo! news, both the link and the quote. As you can see, what Messina actually said was 'punch back twice as hard' not 'hit', and he prefaced it with 'If you get hit...'

        The intention was clearly to show support to the Democrats who were going back to face an already organized 'grassroots' opposition. Just like the Pelosi comment, it was first taken out of context, then twisted out of it's original meaning, and finally ended up a puppet of the right wing. Hope this was helpful!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (August 11, 2009 10:25 am ET)
           
        there's plenty of hypocrisy to go around

        I think you're being overly generous here. We never did to them what they're doing to us (not all loud protesters are created equal - it ain't free speech if it's paid for!) And so we're not condemning something we ever did.

        * We never bused in party-insiders to act a rabble-rowswer
        * We never had the news media ORGANIZING and INSTRUCTING the protests
        * We never, never, never disceminated the kinds of audacious lies that they are perpetrating
        * We never orchastrated an effort to systematically mis-inform people. This is now the SECOND time they've done that, counting 1993. They're just not even trying to be civil about this time.

        So, no, there is NOT "plenty of hypocrisy to go around". There's nothign wrong with trying to be fair, but this goes to far. What they are doing is both despicable and unprecedented. (Exepting the 2000 precident , SET BY THEM and they're "Brooks Brothers" protesters.)

        We've NEVER done anythign like this. Even Code Pink is different, on MANY levels, to what we're seeing here. And they faced CONSEQUENCES for their actions. They were DEALT WITH. And looking back, we acknowledge that they were arguably dealt with approproately. Do you the con's will look bakc on these debaters and say the same thing? No effing way. AND WE'RE NOT EVEN DOPING ANYTHIGN ABOUT THEM! And they'll still cry about their "free speech" (that they're being paid for.)

        You don't have to be so nice to them. They WON'T return the favor.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (August 11, 2009 9:11 am ET)
      1  
      The way Fox News disrespects the leaders of this country is epic. They might boo-hoo that BushieCo was just as maligned but that is not their "fair and balanced" job. And anyway, nobody parsed every word that Dennis Hastert, for example, said and shoved it down his throat 24/7. Especially when he didn't say it.

      These guys are traitors to this country for the simple reason that they (and their propaganda ministers) are out of power.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (August 11, 2009 9:55 am ET)
        2 1
        They might boo-hoo that BushieCo was just as maligned
        Is only maligning if the claims aren't true. The Bush Administration lied through their teeth as easily as they breathed. Their supporters are lying the same way now. It is not "maligning' to point out that lies are lies. It's maligning when the lies are reported as truth.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (August 11, 2009 9:22 am ET)
      3 1
      Actually, Mr. Price, the arrogance is yours. The arrogance to participate in the shake-n-bake creation of a phony outrage movement, including scripted protesters bused in for the express purpose of shouting down a discussion about this issue.

      Plays into the violence? No, sir. Those who bring swastikas, calling our President a Nazi play into the violence. Those who encourage confrontation rather than debate play into the violence. Those who show up only for the purpose of being disruptive play into the violence. Those who do these things began as a created mob, crafted by insurance lobbyists.. and the GOP. There are web pages devoted to bragging about how Republicans who could be helped by this legislation broke up a discussion about it.


      It was a comment by a deputy chief of staff to a group of Democratic congressmen. You are the one who refuses to talk, and it is your party who wants everyone to get out of the way, presumably so we can all go back to bowing down and worshiping at the altar of corporate greed, offering up our homes, our fortunes, and finally our children to the overweening power of the corporations who have bought you and paid for you to continue their fear mongering and lies.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (August 11, 2009 10:35 am ET)
          6
        Plays into the violence? No, sir. Those who bring swastikas, calling our President a Nazi play into the violence.


        Now you're lying. Please show proof that people are bringing swastikas and calling Obama a Nazi. As I pointed out above the one pic of a lady holding a swastika has a circle and a line through it. I haven't seen one piece of credible evidence that this is happening. Granny Pelosi chose the wrong words and now it's coming back to bite her.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Max Credits (August 11, 2009 10:42 am ET)
             
          Look at the top left corner of MM's homepage.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by The_Cat (August 11, 2009 10:54 am ET)
             
          Seen the image on the front page of MMfA? The picture of Rush next to the picture of the kid holding the swastika with a sign that says 'no repeats'? When they bring the swastika to health reform town halls, the protesters are implying that our President's desire to reform health coverage will lead to Nazi-ism. Tbone Slickens, even Rush Limbaugh admitted that swastikas were being brought by protesters.

          "In Michigan, a town hall meeting erupted to the point where police were called. Long-standing healthcare reform supporter John Dingall (D-Mich.) faced angry opponents who far outnumbered the handful of supporters. One man had gotten in Dingall’s face and told him, “You’re a fraud, you have not read the bill!” The man, Mike Sola, has a son disabled by cerebral palsy, and said that Obama’s bill would not help his disabled son. Police finally stepped in and compelled Sola to leave the meeting. “Fascist America!” he was heard to shout as he was escorted out."

          (http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/health-care/1628)

          Here's another one.
          http://mediamatters.org/blog/200908070008

          So, yes, there are swastikas showing up, and yes the protesters are calling Obama a Nazi, or fascist if you prefer.

          Ms. Pelosi called the situation exactly right, and said that drowning out discourse is un-American. It was Bush/Cheney who believed, and practiced, that dissent was treason.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (August 11, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
            1  
            When they bring the swastika to health reform town halls, the protesters are implying that our President's desire to reform health coverage will lead to Nazi-ism.
            I think this is Slickens' warning that he is about to lose any shred of credibility he might have had. This is beyond obvious, unless he thinks that people are randomly calling for an end to Hitler's genocide some 65 years later. Are there people calling for the heads of Marie Antoinette and Czar Nicholas II as well, or what? Of course the "no nazi" sign is a reference to Obama, as a protest against him.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Max Credits (August 11, 2009 10:59 am ET)
             
          Now you're lying.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by harley (August 11, 2009 11:36 am ET)
          3  
          Please show proof that people are bringing swastikas and calling Obama a Nazi.


          Proof:
          [http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/swastikas.jpg]

          You = pwned
          Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (August 11, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
         
      Dana Loesch Defends Person Who Had the Gun Drop Out of Their Pocket at Town Hall: Maybe They Had a Concealed-Carry License

      A gun at a town hall meeting, and the idiot carrying is too stupid to carry it correctly. Must be a reichwinger...
      Report Abuse