Discussing Clinton's "meaningless" trip to Africa, Limbaugh calls her "Sex-retary of State"

Rush is a moron making dumb statement

"I didn't say it was a bad thing..." Gutless Coward. If you are going to post something, be prepared to stand behind it.

"BTW, this has nothing to do with Bush so I don't see the relevance of bringing him into the pix..." Gee, sorry you "don't see" what Bush has to do with it when you accuse LIBERALS of being "Famous" for talking and not acting, and someone points out that when CONSERVATIVES were in power, the same problems existed and nothing got done. I really am sorry you can't see the relevance, but your obliviousness is hardly our problem.

"BTW, this has nothing to do with Bush . . ." - puppychasingitstail


Hm, somebody must've missed the part where HC said, "Bush administration had given a bunch in foreign aid to Africa using those same committees."

NeoKKKons -- STILL acting as if an eight-year presidential administration that ended a scant eight months ago never happened.

Bad puppy -- that's NO way to burnish Dumbya's legacy!

Rush is a joke

Your theories make you feel superior, while they feed no one (except your own ego.) The stupid liberals who illogically donate to feed banks feed people. It doesn't make sense to you because you are a cold-blooded moron who keeps his hand on his wallet as he throws appeals from charities in the trash while bleating "this won't work, this won't work either, this won't work either." This makes you feel good about yourself. Dismissing small attempts to make even a few people's lives a little better makes you feel good about yourself. Yep, donating water is illogical. Bringing food to a food bank is illogical. Holding on to your money and sneering at people who try to help- THAT'S logical.

Whatever. You are a typical conservative- you can't save the world, so you aren't interested in helping ANYBODY. What a great philosophy. You are welcome to it.

"It's not fiscally sound." All anyone needs to know about you, right there. Charity is NOT logical. Nietzche knew it. Spencer knew it. You know it. Good for you. Now if you don't mind, us human beings are trying to live in a society here.

Conservatives don't avoid giving to food banks because they are cheap, they avoid giving because it's "Illogical" and it "doesn't solve the problem." And what WOULD solve the problem? Three possible answers- "We don't know yet," "The problem is unsolvable and therefore not worth dealing with," or "Tax cuts for the wealthy."

Conservatism is the natural result of combining a pathological hatred of fellow human beings and an equally pathological obsession with personal material wealth. Puppies is an excellent example of a Conservative- someone who feels compelled to sneer at anyone who actually wants to lift people up when the "logical" thing to do is to step on them as you climb the ladder.

Hey, pooping rainbows...
try volunteering (GASP!!!1!) at one of these food banks that don't work. Don't worry, the people who work there won't turn you into a gay, socialist/fascist, ni-- lover. Those who work there are generous Christians (I didn't say you wouldn't be uncomfortable), and you could see IN FACT how full of feces your THEORY is.

I am not going to question your intent (left my mind-reading hat in the car) but while there may be "far better ways to help those who need help that cost far less if implemented properly," and of course people who support charity would be interested in implementing such "better ways," nevertheless until these "better ways" are actually happening, then donating canned goods, though it may be "fiscally unsound," is one Hell of a lot better than doing nothing at all while waiting for that theoretically superior solution.